Abstract
This paper discusses the semantics of intensional NP-taking verbs such as need, want, recognize, and hire. It proposes several new linguistic criteria for intensionality besides the traditional ones of failure of existential quantification and substitutivity, and it defends two different semantic analyses for different intensional verbs. For the majority of verbs, the paper argues for a partialized version of the intensional quantifier analysis originally proposed by Montague, but for a single class of verbs, verbs of comparison, it adopts the property analysis recently proposed as a general analysis of intensional verb constructions by Zimmermann (1992). The paper also includes a systematic classification of intensional verbs according to the type of lexical meaning they involve.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1979, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.
Bennett, M. R.: 1974, Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
Carlson, G.: 1977a, Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Carlson, G.: 1977b, ‘Amount Relatives’, Language 53(3), 520–542.
Diesing, M.: 1992, Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass..
Dowty, D. R., R. E. Wall and S. Peters: 1981, Introductions to Montague Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Enç, M.: 1991, ‘The Semantics of Specificity’, Linguistic Inquiry 22(1), 1–26.
Fine, K.: 1982, ‘The Problem of Nonexistents. I. Internalism’, Topoi 1, 97–140.
Gamut, L. T. F.: 1991, Logic, Language, and Meaning, vol. 2, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Heim, J.: 1987, ‘Where Does the Definiteness Restriction Apply? Evidence from the Definiteness of Variables’, in A. ter Meulen and E. Reuland (eds.), The Presentation of (In)definiteness, Cambrige University Press, Cambridge, pp. 21–42.
Heim, I.: 1992, ‘Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Reports’, Journal of Semantics 9, 183–221.
Higginbotham, J.: 1985, ‘On Semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–594.
Humberstone, L.: 1981, ‘From Worlds to Possibilities’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10.
Janssen, T.: 1984, ‘Individual Concepts Are Useful’, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht.
Kaplan, D.: 1986, ‘Opacity’, in L. E. Hahn and P. A. Schilpp (eds.), The Philosophy of W. V. O. Quine, Open Court, La Salle, 229–289.
Karttunen, L.: 1973, ‘Presuppositions of Compound Sentences’, Linguistic Inquiry 4, 169–193.
Karttunen, L.: 1976, ‘Discourse Referents’, in J. McCawley (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 17, Academic Press, New York, pp. 363–385.
Keenan, E.: 1987, ‘A Semantic Definition of Indefinite NP’, in A. ter Meulen and E. Reuland (eds.), The (In)Definiteness Effect, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 286–317.
Keenan, E. and L. M. Faltz: 1985, Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Kratzer, A.: 1989, ‘An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 608–653.
Keenan, E. and D. Westerståhl: 1995, ‘Generalized Quantifiers in Linguistics and Logic’, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Linguistics and Logic, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Lewis, D.: 1972, Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Nouns’, in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 303–323.
Ludlow, P.: 1986, The Syntax and Semantics of Referential Attitude Reports, Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York; reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
May, R. C.: 1985, Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
McCawley, J.: 1974, ‘On Identifying the Remains of Deceased Clauses’, Language Research 9, 73–85.
Milsark, G.: 1977, ‘Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English’, Linguistic Analysis 3, 1–29.
Montague, R.: 1969, ‘On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities’, Monist 53, 159–194; reprinted in Montague (1974), pp. 149–187.
Montague, R.: 1970, ‘Universal Grammar’, Theoria 36, 373–398; reprinted in Montague (1974), pp. 222–246.
Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka et al. (eds.) Approaches to Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 221–242; reprinted in Montague (1974), pp. 247–270.
Montague, R.: 1974, Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Parsons, T.: 1980, Nonexistent Objects, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Partee, B. H. and M. Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 361–383.
Pesetsky, D.: 1987, ‘Wh in Situ: Movement and Unselective Binding’, in E. J. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The (In)Definiteness Effect, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 98–129.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, Journal of Philosophy 53, 177–187.
Roberts, C.: 1989, ‘Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora in Discourse’, Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 683–721.
Stalnaker, R.: 1973, ‘Presuppositions’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 447–457.
Stowell, T.: 1991, ‘Determiners in NP and DP’, in K. Leffell and D. Bouchard (eds.), Views on Phrase Structure, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Vergnaud, J.-R.: 1974, French Relative Clauses, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Zalta, E.: 1983, Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Zalta, E.: 1988, Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Zimmermann, E.: 1992, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Opacity in Certain Verbs’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 149–180.
Zucchi, A.: 1995, ‘The Ingredients of Definiteness and the Definiteness Effect’, Natural Language Semantics 3, 33–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moltmann, F. Intensional Verbs and Quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 5, 1–52 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008245409172
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008245409172