Abstract
This paper is about the semantic analysis of referentially opaque verbs like seek and owe that give rise to nonspecific readings. It is argued that Montague's categorization (based on earlier work by Quine) of opaque verbs as properties of quantifiers runs into two serious difficulties: the first problem is that it does not work with opaque verbs like resemble that resist any lexical decomposition of the seek ≈ try to find kind; the second one is that it wrongly predicts de dicto (i.e. narrow scope) readings due to quantified noun phrases in the object positions of such verbs. It is shown that both difficulties can be overcome by an analysis of opaque verbs as operating on properties.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, M. R.: 1974, Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English, PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
Benthem, J. van: 1984, ‘Questions about Quantifiers’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 443–66.
Buridanus, J.: 1350, Sophismata, ed. by Th. K. Scott, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart 1977.
Cresswell, M. J. and A. von Stechow: 1982, ‘De re Belief Generalized’, Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 503–35.
Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Gallin, D.: 1975, Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Geach, P.: 1965, ‘A Medieval Discussion of Intentionality’, in Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 425–33.
Heim, I.: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Jacobs, J.: 1991, ‘Negation’, in A. v. Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik/Semantics, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 560–96.
Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Part 1, Mathematical Centre Tract 135, Amsterdam, pp. 277–322.
Kamp, H. and U. Reyle: forthcoming, From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Kaplan, D.: 1969, ‘Quantifying in’, in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 178–214.
Kaplan, D.: 1977, ‘Demonstratives’, in J. Almog, J. Perry, H. Wettstein (eds.), 1989, Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 481–563.
Klein, E.: 1979, On Sentences Which Report Beliefs, Desires and Other Mental Attitudes, PhD dissertation, Cambridge University.
Kripke, S. A.: 1972, ‘Naming and Necessity’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 253–355; 763–769.
Kripke, S. A.: 1979, ‘A Puzzle about Belief’, in A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 239–283.
Lerner, J.-Y. and T. E. Zimmermann: 1983, ‘Presuppositions and Quantifiers’, in R. Bäuerle, Ch. Schwarze, A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 290–301.
Lewis, D. K.: 1979, ‘Attitudes de dicto and de se’, Philosophical Review 8, 513–43.
Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms’, in R. Bäuerle, Ch. Schwarze, A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–23.
McCawley, J. D.: 1968, ‘Lexical Insertion in a Transformational Grammar without Deep Structures’, in B. J. Darden, C.-J. Bailey, A. Davison (eds.), Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 71–80.
Milsark, G.: 1977, ‘Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English’, Linguistic Analysis 3, 1–29.
Montague, R.: 1969, ‘On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities’, Monist 53, 159–94.
Montague, R.: 1970, ‘Universal Grammar’, Theoria 36, 373–98.
Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 221–42.
Padoa, A.: 1901, ‘Essai d'une théorie algébrique des nombres entiers, précédé d'une introduction logique à une théorie déductive quelconque’, Bibliothèque du Congrés international de philosophie, Paris, 1900, vol. 3, Armand Colin, Paris, pp. 309–65.
Parsons, T.: 1980, Nonexistent Objects, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Partee, B.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type Shifting Principles’, in J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, M. Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 115–43.
Partee, B.: 1987, ‘Many Quantifiers’, Proceedings of ESCOL.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, Journal of Philosophy 53, 157–87.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Rooth, M.: 1985, Association with Focus, PhD dissertation, GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Stechow, A. von: 1980, ‘Modification of Noun Phrases. A Challenge for Compositional Semantics’, Theoretical Linguistics 7, 57–110.
Stechow, A. von: 1992, Lexical Decomposition and Syntax, Arbeitspapier Nr. 44, Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.
Vendler, Z.: 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.
Zimmermann, T. E.: 1983, ‘Notes on a Recent Textbook in Semantics’, Theoretical Linguistics 10, 65–79.
Zimmermann, T. E.: 1989, ‘Intensional Logic and Two-Sorted Type Theory’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 54, 65–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This is a strongly modified version of a paper entitled ‘Do We Bear Attitudes towards Quantifiers?’ that I have presented at conferences in Gosen (Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft), Ithaca (SALT I), and Konstanz (Lexikon). I owe a special debt to Hans Kamp and Arnim von Stechow for shaping my views on the subject of this paper during the past ten years or so. Comments from and discussions with the following friends and colleagues have also led to considerable improvements: Heinrich Beck, Steve Berman, David Dowty, Veerle van Geenhoven, Fritz Hamm, Irene Heim, Wolfgang Klein, Angelika Kratzer, Michael Morreau, Barbara Partee, Mats Rooth, Roger Schwarzschild, Wolfgang Sternefeld, Emil Weydert, Henk Zeevat, and three referees.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimmermann, T.E. On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Nat Lang Seman 1, 149–179 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372561
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372561