Skip to main content
Log in

A Stochastic Simulation Model of an Optimum Currency Area

  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a two-country stochastic simulation model based on the theory of optimum currency areas, which studies the desirability of a monetary union. Extending the general equilibrium model of Ricci (1995), we introduce the intertemporal dimension, which allows to deal more accurately with labor mobility and shock dynamics. We analyse the importance of shocks asymmetries and investigate the role of labor mobility. Furthermore, we illustrate the influence of trade openness and the impact of a fiscal federalism system, assuming a specific transfer allocation rule based on the relative evolution of unemployment between the two countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayoumi, T. (1994) “A Formal Model of Optimum Currency Areas.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 968, London.

  • Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen (1992) “Shocking Aspects of European Monetary Unification.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 643, London.

  • Beetsma, R. M. and A. L. Bovenberg (1995) “Designing Fiscal and Monetary Institutions for a European Monetary Union.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 1303, London.

  • Beine, M. and F. Docquier (1997) “Fédéralisme fiscal dans un modèle de zone monétaire optimale.” Revue Economique 48(3), 529–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. and D. Quah (1989) “The Dynamic Effects of Demand and Supply Disturbances.” American Economic Review 79, 655–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. and L. Katz (1992) “Regional Evolutions.” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 1.

  • Brociner, A. and P. Levine (1992) “EMU: A Survey.” Centre for European Studies, University of Leicester, Discussion Paper No. 92/4.

  • De Grauwe, P. (1991) “Costs and Benefits of a Monetary Union.” T ijdschrift voor Economie en Management 36(2).

  • De Grauwe, P. and W. Van Haverbeke (1991) “Is Europe an Optimum Currency Area? Evidence from Regional Data.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 555.

  • Eichengreen, B. (1990a) “Is Europe an Optimum Currency Area?” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 478, London.

  • Eichengreen, B. (1990b) “One Money for Europe? Lessons from the U. S. Currency Union.” Economic Policy 10, 117–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1990) “One Market, One Money.” European Economy 44.

  • Fatas, A. (1997) “EMU: Countries or Regions? Lessons from the EMS Experience.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 1558.

  • Fratianni, M. and J. von Hagen (1992) The European Monetary System and European Monetary Union. Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isserman, A., D. Plane, P. Rogerson, and P. Beaumont (1985) “Forecasting Interstate Migration with Limited Data: A Demographic-Economic Approach.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 80, 277–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isserman, A., C. Taylor, S. Gerking, and U. Schubert (1986) “Regional Labor Market Analysis.” In P. Nijkamp (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Chap. 13, pp. 543–580.

  • Italianer, A. and M. Vanheukelen (1992) “Proposals for Community Stabilization Mechanisms: Some Historical Applications.” The Economics of Community Public Finance; European Economy, Special issue 5, 493–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenen, P. (1969) “The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View.” In R. Mundell and A. Swoboda (eds.), Monetary Problems in the International Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1990) “Policy Problems of a Monetary Union.” In P. De Grauwe and L. Papademos (eds.), The European Monetary System in the 1990s.

  • Krugman, P. (1993) “Lessons of Massachusetts for EMU.” In Torres and Giavazzi (eds.), Adjustment Growth in the European Monetary Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, P. R. and M. P. Taylor (1992) “Common Currency Areas and Currency Unions: An Analysis of the Issues.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 617.

  • McKinnon, R. (1963) “Optimum Currency Areas.” American Economic Review, 657–665.

  • Mélitz, J. (1991) “A Suggested Reformulation of the Theory of Optimal Currency Areas.” CEPR Discussion Paper No.590.

  • Mélitz, J. (1993) “The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas, Trade Adjustment and Trade.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 847.

  • Mélitz, J. (1995) “The Current Impasse in Research on Optimum Currency Areas.” European Economic Review 39, 492–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muet, P. A. (1995) “Union monétaire et fédéralisme.” Revue de l’OFCE 55, 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, R. (1961) “A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas.” American Economic Review 715–725.

  • Ricci, L. A. (1995) “A Simple Model of an Optimum Currency Area.” Paper presented at the Journées de l’AFSE, Nantes.

  • Sachs, J. and X. Sala-I-Martin (1992) “Fiscal Federalism and Optimum Currency Areas: Evidence for Europe from the United States.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 632.

  • von Hagen, J. and G. W. Hammond (1995) “Regional Insurance against Asymmetric Shocks. An Empirical Study for the European Community.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 1170.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beine, M., Docquier, F. A Stochastic Simulation Model of an Optimum Currency Area. Open Economies Review 9, 229–257 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008216701051

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008216701051

Navigation