Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the Number of Components in Finite Gaussian Mixtures by Generalised Fisher Ratio, Normalised Entropy Criterion and Functional Merging

  • Published:
Journal of VLSI signal processing systems for signal, image and video technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares the performance of Generalised Fisher Ratio, Normalised Entropy and Functional Merging on assessing the exact parameters and number of components of finite Gaussian mixtures. The three methods use different statistical criteria for calculating the right number of components and have in common the Expectation-Maximisation algorithm for assessing the parameters of Gaussian mixtures. After applying the three above criteria to a similar benchmark as in paper (Celeux and Soromenho, Journal of Classification, 13, 1996) we show that Functional Merging surpass the performance of the other two methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Reed, “Pruning Algorithms–A Survey,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 4, no.5, Sept. 1993, pp. 740–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S.E. Fahlman and C. Lebiere, “The Cascade-Correlation Learning Architecture,” in Neural Information Processing Systems 2, D.S. Touretzky (Ed.), Morgan-Kaufmann, 1990, pp. 524–532.

  3. H. Akaike, “A New Look at the Statistical Identification Model,” IEEE Transactions onAutomatic Control, vol. 19, 1974, pp. 716–723.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Schwarz, “Estimating the Dimension of a Model,” Annals of Statistics, vol. 6, 1978, pp. 461–464.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Bozdogan, “Choosing the Number of Component Clusters in the Mixture Model Using a New Information Complexity Criterion of the Inverse-Fisher Information Matrix,” in Information and Classification, O. Opitz and B. Lausen (Eds.), Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1993, pp. 40–54.

  6. S. Richardson and P.J. Green, “On Bayesian Analysis of Mixtures with an Unknown Number of Components,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 59, no.4, 1997, pp. 731–792.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. C.G. Molina, “Model Adaptation of Normal Mixtures by Functional Merging on Probability Density Estimation,” Tech. Rep. CUED/F-INFENG/ 1996, Cambridge University Engineering Department, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England, Sept. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Zheng and C.G. Molina, “Measuring Tree-Ring Parameters Using the Generalised Fisher Ratio,” in EUSIPCO, Rhodes, Greece, Sept. 8-11, 1998.

  9. G. Celeux and G. Soromenho, “An Entropy Criterion for Assessing the Number of Clusters in a Mixture Model,” Journal of Classification, vol. 13, 1996, pp. 195–212.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird, and D.B. Rubin, “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm,”Journal of Royal Statistical Society, vol. B, no.39, 1977, pp. 1–38.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. C.M. Stow, A.C.T. Kennington, C.G. Molina, and William J. Fitzgerald, “Experimental Issues of Functional Merging on Probability Density Estimation,” in Artificial Neural Networks, London, Institution of Electrical Engineers, July 7-9, 1997, pp. 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Coates, C.G. Molina, and W. Fitzgerald, “Regionally Optimised Kernels for Time Frequency Distributions,” in ICASSP, International Conference in Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Seatle, Washington, USA), May 12-15, 1998.

  13. R. Duda and P. Hart, Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, New York: Wilsey, 1973.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Krishnan, K. Samudravijaya, and P.V.S. Rao, “Feature-Selection for Pattern-Classification with Gaussian Mixture-Models–A New Objective Criterion,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 17, no.8, 1996, pp. 803–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Zheng and C.G. Molina, “Automatic Count of Neural Cells Using the Generalised Fisher Ratio,” in NNESMED'98, Pisa, Italy, Sept. 1998.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molina, C.G. Assessing the Number of Components in Finite Gaussian Mixtures by Generalised Fisher Ratio, Normalised Entropy Criterion and Functional Merging. The Journal of VLSI Signal Processing-Systems for Signal, Image, and Video Technology 26, 95–103 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008199518065

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008199518065

Keywords

Navigation