Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of word and nonword processing in skilled and less-skilled readers

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sixty-eight third graders who were less-skilled readers performed more poorly than younger reading-level control children on tests of pseudoword reading and phonological sensitivity. These findings add to the growing consensus that the proximal cause of reading difficulties are spelling-sound coding problems that result from deficient underlying phonological processes and structures. Analyses of their word and pseudoword reading performance provided some suggestive evidence that less-skilled readers are less sensitive than their younger reading-level matched counterparts to all subword-size orthographic units, perhaps especially to grapheme-sized units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baddeley, A.D., Logie, R.H. & Ellis, N.C. (1988). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia, Cognition 30: 198–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D.A. & Ferraro, F.R. (1993). A dissociation of frequency and regularity effects in pronunciation performance across young adults, older adults, and individuals with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type, Journal of Memory and Language 32: 573–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, P.J. & Millar, D.G. (1982). Subjective judgments of spelling-sound correspondences: Effects of word regularity and word frequency, Memory and Cognition 10: 457–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beech, J. & Harding, L. (1984). Phonemic processing and the poor reader from a developmental lag viewpoint, Reading Research Quarterly 19: 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Dror, I., Pollatsek, A. & Scarpati, S. (1991).Word identification in isolation and in context by college dyslexic students, Brain and Language 40: 471–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, R., D'Autrechy, C.L. & Reggia, J. (1994). Functional pronunciation units in English words, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20: 977–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, R., Reggia, J. & Mitchum, C. (1987). Empirically derived probabilities for graphemeto-phoneme correspondences in English, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 19: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J.A., Cain, M.T. & Ryan, S.M. (1992). A reading-level design study of phonological skills underlying fourth-grade children's word reading difficulties, Child Development 63: 999–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J.A. & Hansen, J. (1994). The development of orthographic rimes as units of word recognition, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 58: 465–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. & Bryant, P.E. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organization as a possible cause of reading backwardness, Nature 271: 746–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (1987). Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming, Journal of Memory and Language 26: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G.D.A. & Loosemore, R. (1994). A computational approach to dyslexic reading and spelling. In: C.K. Leong & R.M. Joshi (eds.), Developmental and acquired dyslexia: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 319–334). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G.D.A. & Watson, F. (1994). Spelling-sound effects in single-word reading, British Journal of Psychology 85: 181–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia, Developmental Psychology 26: 439–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits, Developmental Psychology 28: 874–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. & Treiman, R. (1990). Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: The case of initial consonant clusters, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 50: 156–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. & Treiman, R. (1992). Learning to pronounce words: The limitations of analogies, Reading Research Quarterly 27: 374–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T.H. & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In: D. Besner, T.G. Waller & G.E. MacKinnon (eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 5 (pp. 1–84). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.B., Davies, P. & Richman, B. (1971). Word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. Curtis, B., Atkins, P. & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches, Psychological Review 100: 589–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, V. & Leahy, J. (1992). Children's and adult's reading of nonwords: Effects of regularity and consistency, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18: 718–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A.E. & Stanovich, K.E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience, Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A.E. & Stanovich, K.E. (1993). Children's literacy environments and early word recognition skills, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5: 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In: R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal & P.D. Pearson(eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. 2(pp. 383–417). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C. & Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read by analogy, Reading Research Quarterly 27: 12–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. In: S.A. Brady & D.P. Shankweiler (eds.), Phonological processes in literacy (pp. 97–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glulshko, R. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5: 674–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (1990). A special link between rhyming skills and the use of orthographic analogies by beginning readers, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 31: 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (1993). Toward an interactive analogy model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 56: 443–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (1995). Phonological development and reading by analogy: What is analogy, and what is it not? Journal of Research in Reading 18: 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G. & Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia, Psychological Review 98: 74–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holligan, C. & Johnston, R.S. (1988). The use of phonological information by good and poor readers in memory and reading tasks, Memory and Cognition 16: 522–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, G.W. & Evett, L.J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8: 689–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jared, D. & Seidenberg, M.S. (1990). Naming multisyllabic words, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16: 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, S. & Wilkinson G.S. (1984). The Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. & Bishop, D. (1987). Anatomical differences between nose, palm, and foot, or, the body in question: Further dissection of the processes of sub-lexical spelling-sound translation. In: M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and performance, Vol. 12 (pp. 449–469). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laxon, V., Masterson, J. & Moran, R. (1994). Are children's representations of words distributed? Effects of orthographic neighborhood size, consistency and regularity of naming, Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laxon, V., Smith B. & Masterson, J. (1995). Children's non word reading: Pseudohomophones, neighborhood size, and priming effects, Reading Research Quarterly 30: 126–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, C. & Hornung, M. (1992). The role of orthographic processing skills on five different reading tasks, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4: 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I.Y. & Shankweiler, D. (1985).Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write, Remedial and Special Education 8: 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.M. (1977). Refining phonics for teaching beginning reading, The Reading Teacher 30: 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metsala, J.L. & Brown, G.D.A. (1997). Normal and dyslexic reading development: The role of formal models. In: C. Hulme & R.M. Joshi (eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorder (pp. 235–261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. & Taylor, S. (1997). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 65: 370–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muter, V., Snowling, M. & Taylor, S. (1994). Orthographic analogies and phonological awareness: Their role and significance in early reading development, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 35: 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R.K. (1994). Language deficits in 'specific' reading disability. In: M. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 895–916). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R.K., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B. & Foltz, G. (1985). Individual and developmental differences in reading disability. In: G.E. MacKinnon & T. Waller (eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 4(pp. 1–64). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R.K., Wise, B., Conners, F. & Rack, J. (1990). Organization, heritability, and remediation of component word recognition and language skills in disabled readers. In: T. Carr & B.A. Levy (eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 261–322). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R.K., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J. & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences, Journal of Learning Disabilities 22: 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. & Coltheart, V. (1987). Phonological processes in reading: A tutorial review. In: M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and performance, Vol. 12(pp. 421–447). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K.E. & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt to an old interpretation. In: K. Patterson, J. Marshall & M. Coltheart(eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 335–359). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B.F., McCabe, L.L., Smith, S., Lefly, D., Bookman, M., Kimberling, W. & Lubs, H. (1986). Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia, Child Development 57: 1001–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In: M. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849–894). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S. & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains, Psychological Review 103: 56–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, D. & Shallice, T. (1994). Connectionist modelling in cognitive neuropsychology: A case study. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J. (1985). Orthographic and phonetic coding in developmental dyslexia, British Journal of Psychology 76: 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J.P., Snowling, M.J. & Olson, R.K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review, Reading Research Quarterly 27: 28–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, J. & Simon, D. (1971). The auditory analysis test: An initial report, Journal of Learning Disabilities 4: 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosson, M.B. (1985). The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud, Memory and Cognition 13: 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R. & Pearson, P.D. (1980). Influence of type-token frequencies and final consonants on adults' internalization of vowel digraphs, Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 618–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M.S. (1993). A connectionist modeling approach to word recognition and dyslexia, Psychological Science 4: 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M.S. (1994). Language and connectionism: The developing interface, Cognition 50: 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M.S. & McClelland, J.L. (1989). Visual word recognition and pronunciation: A computational mode of acquisition, skilled performance, and dyslexia. In: A.M. Galaburda(ed.), From reading to neurons (pp. 256–305). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg,M.S., Waters,G.S., Barnes,M.A. & Tanenhaus,M.K. (1984).When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23: 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A., Liberman, A., Brady, S., Thornton, R., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L., Fletcher, J., Stuebing, K., Shaywitz, S. & Shaywitz, B. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax, Psychological Science 6: 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition, Cognition 55: 151–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D.L. & Stanovich, K.E. (1995).Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition, Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology 1: 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L.S. (1993). The development of reading. In: H. Reese (ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 24 (pp. 63–97). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L.S. & Ryan, E.B. (1988). Development of grammatical-sensitivity, phonological, and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children, Developmental Psychology 24: 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L.S., Share, D. & Geva, E. (1995). Evidence for superior orthographic skills in dyslexics, Psychological Science 6: 250–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. (1980). The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 29: 294–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanback, M.L. (1992). Syllable and rime patterns for teaching reading: Analysis of a frequency-based vocabulary of 17,602 words, Annals of Dyslexia 42: 196–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?, Reading Research Quarterly 26: 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. (1993). Does reading make you smarter? Literacy and the development of verbal intelligence. In: H. Reese (ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 24 (pp. 133–180) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. (1994). Does dyslexia exist?, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 35: 579–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. & Cunningham, A.E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition, Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E., Nathan, R.G. & Zolman, J.E. (1988). The developmental lag hypothesis in reading: Longitudinal and matched reading-level comparisons, Child Development 59: 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. & Siegel, L.S. (1994). The phenotypic performance profile of readingdisabled children: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model, Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 24–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. & West, R.F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing, Reading Research Quarterly 24: 402–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taraban, R. & McClelland, J.L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation, Journal of Memory and Language 26: 608–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K. & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading, Journal of Learning Disabilities 27: 276–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1989). The internal structure of the syllable. In: G. Carlson & M. Tanenhaus (eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 27–52). Dordrecht/ Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1992). The role of intrasyllabic units in learning to read and spell. In: P.B.Gough, L.C. Ehri & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 65–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., Goswami, U. & Bruck, M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory, Memory and Cognition 83: 346–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1985). Are there qualitative differences in reading behavior between dyslexics and normal readers?, Memory and Cognition 13: 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R. & Richmond-Welty, E.D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124: 107–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. & Zukowski, A. (1991). Levels of phonological awareness. In: S.A. Brady & D.P. Shankweiler (eds.), Phonological processes in literacy (pp. 67–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R.L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R.L. & Massaro, D.W. (1987). Orthographic structure and spelling-sound regularity in reading English words. In: A. Allport, D. MacKay, W. Prinz & E. Scheerer (eds.), Language perception and production (pp. 159–179). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. & Seidenberg, M. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria, Memory and Cognition 13: 557–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, F. & Brown, G. (1992). Single-word reading in college dyslexics, Applied Cognitive Psychology 6: 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised: Examiner's manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R. & Durrell, D.D. (1970). Teaching vowels through phonograms, Elementary English 47: 787–791.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gottardo, A., Chiappe, P., Siegel, L.S. et al. Patterns of word and nonword processing in skilled and less-skilled readers. Reading and Writing 11, 465–487 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008034802088

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008034802088

Navigation