Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Institutional Effects on the Evolution of the Size Distribution of Firms

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper it is argued that the size distribution of firms may largely be determined by institutional factors. This hypothesis is tested in an exploratory fashion by studying the evolution of the size distribution of firms over time in Sweden for a period spanning from the late 1960s to the early 1990s. The data used are divided into finer size classes compared to most previous studies. This gives more scope for investigating the impact of institutions. Moreover, we use a unique data set, starting in 1984, to take account of corporate groups and government ownership. The analysis shows a poor development for intermediate-sized (10–199 employees) firms. This is likely to reflect the existence of a threshold that many firms are either unwilling or unable to cross. The analysis of the institutions and rules of the game determining the entrepreneurial and business conditions in Sweden indicate that the conditions have been unfavorable for small firms, and hence that too few small firms have managed to grow out of the smallest size classes. The conclusion is supported by an international comparison of the number of firms in different size classes. Data indicate that Sweden has fewer small (10–99 employees), and more large (500+) firms per capita than other European countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. and D. B. Audretsch, 1993, Small Firms and Entrepreneurship: An East-West Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, M., 1991, Nyföretagande i Sverige-vilka, hur och varför?SIND 1991: 6. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D., A. Haggerty and W. Parsons, 1995, Who's Creating Jobs?, Boston: Cognetics Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G. and A. J. Oswald, 1991, ‘Does Access to Capital Help Make an Entrepreneur?' NBER Working Paper No. 3252.

  • Blau, D. M., 1987, ‘A Time-Series Analysis of Self-Employment in the United States’, Journal of Political Economy 95(2), 445–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm, P. and B. Carlsson, 1993, ‘Entreprenörskap, småföretag och industriell förnyelse’, Ekonomisk Debatt 21(4), 317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. and J. Medoff, 1989, ‘The Employer Size Wage Effect’, Journal of Political Economy 97(5), 1027–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., 1992, ‘Industrial Dynamics and the Role of Small Plants in Swedish Manufacturing Industry, 1968–1988’, IUI Working Paper No. 348.

  • Carlsson, B., 1996, ‘Small Business, Flexible Technology, and Industrial Structure’, in Z. J. Acz, B. Carlsson and R. Thurik (eds.), Small Business in the Modern Economy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressy, R. and C. Olofsson, 1997, ‘The Financial Constraints for Swedish SMEs: Survey and Research Agenda’, Small Business Economics 9(2), 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., 1989, ‘Entrepreneurship-and After? A Study of Growth Willingness in Small Firms’, Journal of Business Venturing 4(2), 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., L. Lindmark and C. Olofsson, 1994, Dynamiken i svenskt näringsliv, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., L. Lindmark and C. Olofsson, 1996, Näringslivsdynamik under 90-talet, Stockholm: NUTEK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J., J. Haltiwanger and S. Schuh, 1996, Job Creation and Destruction, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J. and M. Henrekson, 1997a, ‘Industrial Policy, Employer Size, and Economic Performance in Sweden’, in R. B. Freeman, R. Topel and B. Swedenborg (eds.), The Welfare State in Transition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J. and M. Henrekson, 1997b, ‘Explaining National Differences in the Size and Industrial Distribution of Employment’, NBER Working Paper No. 6246.

  • Edin, P. A. and R. Topel, 1997, ‘Wage Policy and Restructuring-The Swedish Labor Market Since 1960’, in R. B. Freeman, R. Topel and B. Swedenborg (eds.), The Welfare State in Transition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat, 1990, Enterprises in the European Community, First Report. Luxembourg.

  • Eurostat, 1992, Enterprises in the European Community, Second Report. Luxembourg.

  • Eurostat, 1994, Enterprises in the European Community, Third Report. Luxembourg.

  • Eurostat, 1997, Enterprises in the European Community, Fourth Report. Luxembourg.

  • Fazzari, S., G. Hubbard and B. Petersen, 1988, ‘Financing Constraints and Corporate Investments’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 141–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukao, M. and M. Hanazaki, 1987, ‘Internationalization of Financial Markets and the Allocation of Capital’, OECD Economic Studies 8, 35–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson, M., 1992, ‘Sweden: Monetary and Financial System’, in P. Newman, M. Milgate and J. Eatwell (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money & Finance, London and New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson, M. in collaboration with S. J. Davis, 1996, Företagandets villkor. Spelregler för sysselsättning och tillväxt, Stockholm: SNS Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heum, P., P. Ylä-Anttila, P. Braunerhjelm and S. Thomsen, 1993, ‘Firm Dynamics in a Nordic Perspective: Large Corporations and Industrial Transformation’, IUI Working Paper No. 401. Stockholm.

  • Holtz-Eakin, D., D. Joulfaian and H. S. Rosen, 1994, ‘Sticking It Out: Entrepreneurial Survival and Liquidity Constraints’, Journal of Political Economy 102(1), 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagrén, L., 1993, ‘De dominerande storföretagen’, in Den långa vägen, Stockholm: IUI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, D., 1997, ‘The Number and Size Distribution of Firms in Sweden and Other European Countries’, Licentiate Dissertation, Stockholm School of Economics.

  • Kazamaki Ottersten, E., 1994, ‘Yrkeskompetens och rekryteringskrav’, in G. Eliasson and E. Kazamaki Ottersten (eds.), Om förlängd skolgång, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. A. and D. Fullerton (eds.), 1984, The Taxation of Income from Capital. A Comparative Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden and West Germany, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindh, T. and H. Ohlsson, 1996, ‘Self-Employment and Windfall Gains: Evidence from the Swedish Lottery’, Economic Journal 106(439), 1515–1526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindh, T. and H. Ohlsson, 1998, ‘Self-Employment and Wealth Inequality’, Review of Income and Wealth, forthcoming.

  • Loveman, G. and W. Sengenberger, 1991, ‘The Reemergence of Small-Scale Production: An International Comparison’, Small Business Economics 3(1), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundström, A. et al., 1993, "De nya och små företagens roll i svensk ekonomi’, Expert Report No. 18 to the Swedish Government Commission on Economic Policy, SOU 1993:16. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., 1993, ‘Firm Size Effects on Transaction Costs’, Small Business Economics 5(3), 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • NUTEK, 1994, Småföretagen-Sveriges framtid?B 1994:4. Stockholm: NUTEK Företag.

    Google Scholar 

  • NUTEK, 1996, Småföretagen i Sverige, 1996. B 1996:11. Stockholm: NUTEK Företag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. and C. Sabel, 1984, The New Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rylander, L., 1995, Tillväxtföretag i startfas. Från dimma och mörker till relationslyft, Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Business Administration, Stockholm University.

  • Schwalbach, J., 1994, ‘Small Business Dynamics in Europe’, Small Business Economics 6(1), 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A., 1988, ‘Flexible Production Systems and Regional Development: The Rise of New Industrial Space in North America and Western Europe’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 12(1), 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOU 1982:52, En effektivare kreditpolitik,Betänkande av kreditpolitiska utredningen. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Södersten, J., 1984, ‘Sweden’, In M. A. King and D. Fullerton (eds.), The Taxation of Income from Capital. A Comparative Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden and West Germany, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Södersten, J., 1993, ‘Sweden’, in D. W. Jorgenson and R. Landau (eds.), Tax Reform and the Cost of Capital. An International Comparison, Washington D.C.: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M. and G. Reitberger, 1982, ‘Technology and Industrial Innovation in Sweden: A Study of New-Technology Based Firms’, Center for Policy Alternatives, MIT and STU, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IUI, the Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Box 5501, S-114 85, Stockholm, Sweden

    Magnus Henrekson

  2. Department of Industrial Economics and Management, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44, Stockholm, Sweden

    Dan Johansson

Authors
  1. Magnus Henrekson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dan Johansson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henrekson, M., Johansson, D. Institutional Effects on the Evolution of the Size Distribution of Firms. Small Business Economics 12, 11–23 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008002330051

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008002330051

Keywords

Search

Navigation