Skip to main content
Log in

A Psychometric Evaluation of the Family Rules From the Past Questionnaire

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes an initial psychometric evaluation of a new 15–item self-report instrument, the Family Rules from the Past questionnaire (FRP), which measures perceived dysfunctional rules from the past. Reliability and validity tests were conducted including a factor analysis to determine the underlying dimensions of the FRP. A sample of 943 young adults completed the FRP, a demographic questionnaire, and measures of family health and competence, alcoholism in the family, and social desirability. Results showed support for internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity, concurrent validity, and criterion-related validity for the FRP. Individuals from dysfunctional families and adult children of alcoholics scored significantly higher on the FRP than individuals from more functional families. Implications for the uses of the FRP in individual, couple, and family therapy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartle-Haring, S., & Gavazzi, S. M. (1996). Multiple views on family data: The sample case of adolescent, maternal, and paternal perspectives on family differentiation levels. Family Process, 35, 457–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavers, W. R., & Hampson, R. B. (1990). Successful families: Assessment and intervention. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (1993). Family therapy: A systemic integration (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benenson, J. F. (1996). Gender differences in the development of relationships. In Noam, G. G., & Fischer, K. W. (Eds.), Development and vulnerability in close relationships (pp. 263–286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, C. (1980). It will never happen to me. Denver, CO: M.A.C. Printing and Publishing Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins, W. (1993). Your family your self. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, C. B. (1990). Fashioning family therapy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. R., Day, R. D., & Bahr, K. S. (1993). Family science. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, L. (1986). Family paradigms. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica, 16, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 359–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, M. T. (1996). The effects of unhealthy family of origin rules on the dating relationships of young adults. Unpublished master's thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkin, M. (1984). Families under the influence: The development of an alcoholic family. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B. (1982). Sex roles and family dynamics. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes (pp. 354–364). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, F. R. (1983). Rules: The invisible family. Family Process, 22, 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, F. R., & Herrick, J. (1974). Family rules: Family life styles. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 44, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, M. A., & Mason, M. J. (1986). Facing shame. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Framo, J. (1981). The integration of marital therapy with sessions with the family of-origin. In A. S. Gurman and D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 133–158). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, K. M., & Brommel, B. J. (1991). Family communication: Cohesion and change. New York: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. (1996). Why marriages succeed or fail. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, K. (1990). The theoretical myth of sameness: A critical issue in family therapy training. In G. Suba, B. Karrar, & K. Hardy (Eds.), Minorities in family therapy (pp. 17–33). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J. M., & Hoopes, M. H. (1990). Uncovering shame. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper J., & Hoopes, M. (1991). Family Rules From the Past Questionnaire. Unpublished survey, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. D. (1965). The study of the family. Family Process, 4, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. W. (1981). The Children of Alcoholics Screening Test (CAST). Chicago: Family Recovery Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchens, J. A. (1991). Understanding and treating codependence. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. H., Peterson, D. J., Heath, V. A., & Birch, P. (2000). The relationship between perceived dysfunctional family-of-origin rules and intimacy in young adult dating relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26, 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livson, F. B. (1981). Paths to psychological health in the middle years: Sex differences. In D. Eichorn, J. A. Clausen, N. Haan., M. P. Hanzik, & P. H. Mussen (Eds.), Present and past in midlife (pp. 195–221). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. (1981). The drama of the gifted child. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. (1995). Family rules and intimacy in young adult dating relationships. Unpublished master's thesis. Brigham Young University, Provo. UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilat, J. M., & Jones, J. W. (1985). Identification of children of alcoholics: Two empirical studies. Alcohol Health and Research World, 27–36.

  • Pittman, F. S., & Flomenhaft, K. (1970). Treating the doll's house marriage. Family Process, 9, 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond-Jensen, S. (1993). The relationship between internalized shame and family of-origin rules for adult women.Unpublished master's thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatelli, R. M., & Mazor, A. (1985). Differentiation, individuation, and identity formation: The integration of family systems and individual development. Adolescence, 20, 619–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V. (1972). Peoplemaking. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V. (1988). The new peoplemaking. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, W. R. (1990). Evaluation of the family field: Measurement principles and techniques. In J. Touliatos, B. F. Perlmutter, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques (pp. 23–36). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 191–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegscheider, S. (1981). Another chance: Hope and health for the alcoholic family. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D.S. (1981). Personal authority via termination of the intergenerational hierarchical boundary: A “new” stage in the family life cycle. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 441–452.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larson, J.H., Parks, A.A., Harper, J.M. et al. A Psychometric Evaluation of the Family Rules From the Past Questionnaire. Contemporary Family Therapy 23, 83–103 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007876200433

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007876200433

Navigation