Skip to main content
Log in

Market Share and Price Setting Behavior for Private Labels and National Brands

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the nature of demand and competitive response in the market for private label and national “branded” grocery products. Specifically,we employ less restrictive functional forms than usedin prior research. Specifically, we incorporateLA/AIDS demands and the corresponding price reactionequations to estimate consumer price sensitivities andsupply side price strategies for national brand andprivate label products. Oligopolistic priceinterdependence is explored further by specifyingbrand share, brand Herfindahl, and a measure of thestructure of the local retail markets in the supplyside relations to evaluate explicitly the impact ofmarket structure.

In our empirical analysis, we estimate a system of market share and price equations simultaneously inorder to examine (i) the determinants of the demandresponse to pricing and promotion decisions and (ii)the determinants of private label and national brandpricing behavior. Using data for 143 food productcategories and 59 geographic markets, we develop amodel that captures the variation in privatelabel-national brand share and pricing acrosscategories and markets. Key findings include: (i)demand response to price and promotion is decidedlyasymmetric, (ii) price followship between privatelabels and national brands is positive, but notstrong, and (iii) markets characterized by highernational brand market share and higher supermarketconcentration tend to have higher prices forboth national brands and private labels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allenby, G. M., and P. E. Rossi (1991) ‘Quality Perceptions and Asymmetric Switching between Brands’, Marketing Science, 10, 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrisani, C. (1996) ‘Will Private Labels Crackle?’, Supermarket News, 46(26), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, E. (1979) ‘Testing Price Taking Behavior’, Journal of Econometrics, 19, 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E. R. (1991) The Practice of Econometrics. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes (1995) ‘Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium’, Econometrica, 63, 841–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, R. C., and K. J. Wisniewski (1989) ‘Price Induced Patterns of Competition’, Marketing Science, 8, 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. A. L., and A. L. Nagar, ‘Coefficients of Correlation for Simultaneous Equation Systems’, Journal of Econometrics, 6, 39–50.

  • Choi, S. C. (1991) ‘Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer’, Marketing Science, 10, 271–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen, M., S. Gupta, J. C. Porter, R. Staelin, and D. R. Wittink (1997) ‘Using Market-Level Data to Understand Non-Linear Promotion Effects’, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 322–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, R. W. (1999a) ‘Market Power and the Demsetz Quality Critique: An Evaluation for Food Retailing’, Agribusiness, 15.

  • Cotterill, R. W. (1999b) ‘High Cereal Prices and the Prospects for Relief by Expansion of Private Label and Antitrust Enforcement’, Agribusiness, 15.

  • Cotterill, R. W., L. Egan, and W. Buckhold (2000) ‘Beyond Illinois Brick: The Economics of Cost Pass-Through in the ADM Price Fixing Case’, Review of Industrial OrganizationAgribusiness, 15.

  • Genesove, D., and W. Mullin (1998) ‘Testing Static Oligopoly Models: Conduct and Cost in the Sugar Industry, 1890–1914’, The Rand Journal of Economics, 29, 355–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R., and J. M. Alston (1990) ‘Elasticities in AIDS Models’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 442–445.

  • Haller, L. E., and R. W. Cotterill (1996) ‘Evaluating Traditional Share, Price and Residual Demand Measures of Market Power in the Catsup Industry’, Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A., and W. E. Taylor (1981) ‘Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects’, Econometrica, 49, 1377–1398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, S. J., and S. Banerji (1993) ‘When Do Private Labels Succeed?’, Sloan Management Review, 57–67.

  • Hoch, S. J., B.-D. Kim, A. L. Montgomery, and P. E. Rossi (1995) ‘Determinants of Store-Level Price Elasticity’, Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G., R. C. Hill, and T. C. Lee, The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: Wiley.

  • Kadiyali, V., N. J. Vilcassim, and P. Chintagunta (1996) ‘Empirical Analysis of Competitive Product Line Pricing Decisions: Lead, Follow, or Move Together, Journal of Business, 69, 459–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadiyali, V., N. J. Vilcassim, and P. Chintagunta (1998) ‘Product Line Extensions and Competitive Market Interactions: An Empirical Analysis’, Journal of Econometrics, forthcoming.

  • Kelton, C., and L. Weiss (1989) ‘Change in Concentration, Change in Cost, Change in Demand, and Change in Price’, in L. Weiss, ed., Concentration and Price. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiviet, J. F. (1985) ‘Model Selection Test Procedures in a Single Linear Equation of a Dynamic Simultaneous System and their Defects in Small Samples’, Journal of Econometrics, 28, 327–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwoka, J., and D. Ravenscraft (1986) ‘Cooperation v. Rivalry: Price Cost Margins by Line of Business’, Economica, 53, 351–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., and R. Staelin (1997) ‘Vertical Strategic Interaction: Implications for Channel Pricing Strategy’, Marketing Science, 16, 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D., and J. Reitzes (1993) ‘Product Differentiation and the Ability to Collude: Where Being Different Can Be an Advantage’, The Antitrust Bulletin, 349–368.

  • Liang, N. (1987) ‘An Empirical Conjectural Variation Model of Oligopoly’, Working Paper No. 151, Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion, B. (1979) The Food Retailing Industry. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (1993) Advanced Industrial Economics. Blackwell Oxford.

  • Narasimhan, C., and R. T. Wilcox (1998) ‘Private-Labels and the Channel Relationship: A Cross-Category Analysis’, Journal of Business, 7, 573–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, A. (1998) ‘Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry’, NBER Working Paper No. 6387, Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putsis, W. P. (1997) ‘An Empirical Study of the Effect of Brand Proliferation on Private Label – National Brand Pricing Behavior, Review of Industrial Organization, 12, 355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putsis, W. P. (1999) ‘Share, Price and Category Expenditure – Geographic Market Effects and Private Labels’, Unpublished Manuscript, London Business School.

  • Putsis, W. P., and R. Dhar (1998) ‘Category Expenditure, Promotion and Competitive Market Interaction: Can Promotions Really Expand the Pie?, Working Paper, London Business School.

  • Raju, J. S., R. Sethuraman, and S. K. Dhar (1995a) ‘National Brand-Store Brand Price Differential and Store Brand Market Share’, Pricing Strategy & Practice: An International Journal.

  • Raju, J. S., R. Sethuraman, and S. K. Dhar (1995b) ‘The Introduction and Performance of Store Brands’, Management Science, 41, 957–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. (1984) ‘Testing Oligopolistic Behavior’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2, 367–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1978) ‘Entry Deterrence in the Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry’, Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 305–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethuraman, R. (1995) ‘A Meta-Analysis of National Brand and Store Brand Cross Promotional Price Elasticities’, Marketing Letters, 6, 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethuraman, R., and J. Mittelstaedt (1992) ‘Coupons and Private Labels: A Cross-Category Analysis of Grocery Products’, Psychology & Marketing, 9, 487–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, M. E. (1995) ‘Product Rivalry with Multiple Strategic Weapons: An Analysis of Price and Advertising Competition’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 4, 445–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G. J. (1988) ‘The Price Elasticity of Selective Demand: A Meta Analysis of Econometric Models of Sales’, Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 331–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1989) The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. W., ed. (1989) Concentration and Price. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werden, G. J., and L. M. Froeb (1996) ‘Simulation as an Alternative to Structural Merger Policy in Differentiated Products Industries’, in M. B. Coate and A. N. Kleit, eds., Competition Policy Enforcement: The Economics of the Antitrust Process. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werden, G. J., and G. Rozanski (1994) ‘The Market Delineation Dilemma’, Antitrust, 40–43.

  • Willig, R. D. (1991) ‘Merger Analysis, Industrial Organization Theory and Merger Guidelines’, in M. N. Bailey and C. Winston, eds., Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp. 281–312.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cotterill, R.W., Putsis, W.P. Market Share and Price Setting Behavior for Private Labels and National Brands. Review of Industrial Organization 17, 17–39 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007875302869

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007875302869

Navigation