Abstract
The formal and conceptual framework for causal duality in physical systems [2,4–7] is reviewed and extended in view of evolutions during which the system under consideration may be destroyed.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
D. Aerts, “Description of many separated physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics,” Found. Phys. 12, 1131 (1982).
H. Amira, B. Coecke, and I. Stubbe, “How quantales emerge by introducing induction within the operational approach,” Helv. Phys. Acta 71, 554 (1998).
G. Birkhoff and J. von Neumann, “The logic of quantum mechanics,” Ann. Math. 37, 823 (1936).
B. Coecke and I. Stubbe, “Operational resolutions and state transitions in a categorical setting,” Found. Phys. Lett. 12, 29 (1999).
B. Coecke and D.J. Moore, “Operational Galois adjunctions,” in: B. Coecke, D.J. Moore and A. Wilce, eds., Current Research in Operational Quantum Logic: Algebras, Categories and Languages (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2000), pp. 198-218
W. Daniel, “Axiomatic description of irreversible and reversible evolution of a physical system,” Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 941 (1989).
Cl.-A. Faure, D.J. Moore, and C. Piron, “Deterministic evolutions and Schrödinger flows,” Helv. Phys. Acta 68, 150 (1995).
J.M. Jauch and C. Piron, “On the structure of quantal proposition systems,” Helv. Phys. Acta 42, 842 (1969).
D.J. Moore, “On state spaces and property lattices,” Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 30, 61 (1999).
C. Piron, Foundations of Quantum Physics (Benjamin, New York, 1976).
C. Piron, Mécanique quantique (Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, 1990).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sourbron, S. A NOTE ON CAUSAL DUALITY. Found Phys Lett 13, 357–367 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007871611325
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007871611325