Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis and Classification of Problem Statements in Technology Transfer

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For many years, the U.S. Government has encouraged the transfer of technologies developed through taxpayer funded endeavors to the commercial sector of the U.S. economy. The Regional Technology Applications Board, based at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, is an organization with technology transfer responsibilities. The Board receives technology transfer assistance (TTA) requests from many private-sector firms. The Board relies heavily on a problem statement from the requestor of technology assistance in determining an appropriate solution to the requestor's needs. However, the problem statements contained in these requests are often vague, ambiguous, or repetitive. This study reports on a method developed to analyze and classify problem statements that have been received by the Board so that additional understanding of the nature of these problems is obtained. One thousand one hundred past problem statements were analyzed using a content analysis method. The hierarchical classification structure developed during this project includes classes, sub-classes, and sub-sub-classes, allowing for differentiation of problem statements based upon key elements contained within the statements. Previously, no method for analysis and classification of problem statements had been documented. The results of the study indicate that problem statements can be analyzed and classified. The problem statement classification structure created through this project provides a vehicle for problem statement assignment, thereby lending additional form to the problem definition process. The study also provides an understanding of the frequency and distribution of TTA problem statements received by the Board.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agre, G., 1982, ‘The Concept of Problem’, Educational Studies 13, 121-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. and M. Janson, 1979, ‘Methods for Managerial Problem Cause’, Interfaces 9(5), 121-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E., 1977, The Practice of Social Research, 2nd ed., Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhard, C., 1938, The Functions of the Executive, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartee, E., 1973, ‘A Holistic View of Problem Solving’, Management Science 20(4), 439-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J., 1977, Research in Education, 3rd ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, R., R. Thorp and L. Donohew, 1967, Content Analysis of Communications, New York: MacMillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, T., 1972, Content Analysis, London: B. T. Batsford Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., 1933, How We Think, Boston: D. C. Heath & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. and D. Sims, 1981, ‘Subjectivity in Problem Identification’, Interfaces 11(1), 68-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. and P. Wason, Eds., 1977, Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, M. and I. Mitroff, 1980, ‘Organizational Problem Formulation: An Empirical Study’, Administrative Science Quarterly 25(1), 102-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, K.R. and R.N. Taylor, 1976, ‘Decision Making and Problem Solving‘, in M. D. Dunnette, Ed., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 1397-1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElrath-Slade, R., 1994, ‘Caution: Re-engineering in Progress’, HRMagazine 16(6), June.

  • Mello, J., 1995, ‘Four Steps to Turning Around Problem Performance’, Supervisory Management, December.

  • Mintzberg, H., D. Raisinghani and A. Theoret, A., 1976, ‘The Structure of Unstructured Decision Processes’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 247-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and H.A. Simon, 1972, Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P., 1984, ‘Types of Organizational Decision Processes’, Administrative Science Quarterly 29(3), 414-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G., 1945, How To Solve It, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pounds, W., 1969, ‘The Process of Problem Finding’, Industrial Management Review 11, 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, W., 1990, ‘Are you a Good Decision Maker?’, Industrial Engineering 42(8), August.

  • Reitman, W., 1964, ‘Heuristic Decision Procedures: Open Constraints and the Structure of Ill-Defined Problems‘, in M.W. Shelly and G.L. Bryan, Eds., Human Judgements and Optimality, New York: John Wiley, pp. 282-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.F., 1985, ‘The Effects of Management Science Interventions on the Solving of Unstructured Problems’, Doctoral Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Smith, G.F., 1988, ‘Towards a Heuristic Theory of Problem Structuring’, Management Science 34(12), 1489-1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.F., 1989, ‘Defining Managerial Problems: A Frame-work For Prescriptive Theory’, Management Science 35(8), 963-981.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Technology Transfer Agreement Services‘, 1997, Internet: http://fcn.state.fl.us/stac/tta1.html, Feb. 18.

  • Weber, R., 1985, Basic Content Analysis, London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘What Is Technology Transfer?‘, 1997, Internet: http://techtran. msfc.nasa.gov/!WHATIST.HTM, Feb. 18.

  • Zitelli, J. and J. Tucker, 1991, ‘Management Advisory Services: Training the MAS Practitioner’, Journal of Accountancy 49(1), January.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harper, J.S., Rainer, R.K. Analysis and Classification of Problem Statements in Technology Transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer 25, 135–156 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007820606112

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007820606112

Keywords

Navigation