Skip to main content
Log in

The Profit-Structure Relationship in Legally Protected Banking Markets Using Efficiency Measures

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our various tests suggest that our sample banks that are shielded from competition by severe intrastate branching restrictions have market power. This analysis has allowed us to test rigorously the adverse effects of legal and possibly market barriers to entry. We reject the notion that profits are a result of superior $x$-efficiency. We conclude if these results are corroborated by further research (e.g., using other measures of profit, efficiency, capital, etc), and if these and/or other barriers remain, the Federal Reserve should be concerned with the competitive impacts of rural, in-market bank mergers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amel, Dean and Liang, J. Nellie (1992) ‘The Relationship Between Entry into Banking Markets and Changes in Legal Restrictions on Entry’, The Antitrust Bulletin, 37, 631-649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen (1995) ‘The Profit-Structure Relationship in Banking: A Test of the Market Power and Efficient Structure Hypotheses', Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 27, 404-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen and Hannan, Timothy (1989) ‘The Price-Concentration Relationship in Banking’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 291-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calem, Paul and Carlino, Gerald (1991) ‘The Concentration/Conduct Relationship in Bank Deposit Markets', Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 268-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, Malcolm B. and Kleit, Andrew N. (1995) ‘The Political Economy of Federal Trade Commission Administrative Decision Making in Merger Enforcement’, Working Paper No. 210, Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (’Call Report’), Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

  • Cornwell, Christopher and Schmidt, Peter (1995) ‘Production Frontiers and Efficiency Measurement’, in L. Matyas and P. Sevestre (eds), The Econometrics of PanelData, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold (1973) ‘Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy’, Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economides, Nicholas, Hubbard, R. Glenn, and Palia, Darius (1995) ‘The Political Economy of Branching Restrictions and Deposit Insurance: a Model of Monopolistic Competition Among Small and Large Banks', NBERWorking Paper, Number 5210.

  • Elliehausen, Gregory and Wolken, John (1990) ‘Banking Markets and the Use of Financial Services by Small and Medium-Sized Businesses', Federal Reserve Bulletin, 76, 801-817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliehausen, Gregory and Wolken, John (1992) ‘Banking Markets and the Use of Financial Services by Households', Federal Reserve Bulletin, 78, 169-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evanoff, Douglas and Fortier, Diana (1988) ‘Reevaluation of the Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm in Banking’, Journal of Financial Services Research, 1, 277-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame, W. Scott and Holder, Christopher (1994) ‘FYI - Commercial Bank Profits in 1993’, Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 9, 22-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. Alton (1984) ‘Bank Market Structure and Competition: a Survey’, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 16, 617-645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Timothy (1991) ‘Bank Commercial Loan Markets and the Role of Market Structure: Evidence from Surveys of Commercial Lending’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 15, 133-149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, Mickey (1996) ‘Bill Passed, Banks Mull Next Move’, Atlanta Journal/Constitution, 128(January 27), E1.

  • Kamerschen, David R. (1994) ‘Testing for Antitrust Market Definition Under the Federal Government Guidelines', Journal of Legal Economics, 4, 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • One Source, (file data), Alex Sheshunoff and Company.

  • Rhoades, Stephen (1985) ‘Market Share as a Source of Market Power: Implications and Some Evidence’, Journal of Economics and Business, 37, 343-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, Stephen and Kurtz, Robert (1992) ‘A Note on the Market-Share Profitability Relationship’, Review of Industrial Organization, 7, 39-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, Harvey, DiClemente, John, and O’Brien, Kit (1985) ‘The ProductMarket in Commercial Banking: Cluster's Last Stand?’ Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 9,21-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Peter and Sickles, Robin (1984) ‘Production Frontiers and Panel Data’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2, 367-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, Sherrill (1994) ‘Bank Competition in Concentrated Markets', Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, 3-16.

  • Shepherd, William G. (1982) ‘Economies of Scale and Monopoly Profits', in J. V. Craven (ed.) Industrial Organization, Antitrust, and Public Policy, Nijhoff: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirlock, Michael (1985) ‘Evidence on the (Non) Relationship between Concentration and Profitability in Banking’, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 17, 69-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (1992) Horizontal Merger Guidelines,Washington, D.C., reprinted as a Special Supplement in Antitrust & Trade Regulation Report, 62(April 2), S1–S13.

  • U.S. v. Philadelphia National Bank (1963), 374 U.S. 321.

  • Weiss, Leonard (1974) ‘The Concentration-Profits Relationship and Antitrust’, in Harvey J. Goldschmid, H. Michael Mann, and J. Fred Weston (eds), IndustrialConcentration: TheNewLearning, Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelock, David and Wilson, Paul (1995) ‘Evaluating the Efficiency of Commercial Banks: Does Our View of What Banks do Matter?’ Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 39-52.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frame, W.S., Kamerschen, D.R. The Profit-Structure Relationship in Legally Protected Banking Markets Using Efficiency Measures. Review of Industrial Organization 12, 9–22 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007798618469

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007798618469

Navigation