Skip to main content
Log in

A Test for Natural Monopoly with Application to Norwegian Electricity Distribution

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reorganization of public utilities is on the currentpolitical agenda in many European countries. However,in many cases the most fundamental question in termsof public policy towards these industries is nottested; does the underlying cost structure indicate anatural monopoly or not? Evans and Heckman's analysisof the US Bell System is one of the few exceptions,but their method has a serious problem as theirestimated cost function is not well behaved (negativemarginal costs). To solve this problem we propose touse the consistency region (i.e., the region where theestimated cost function is well behaved) as the testregion. We apply our testing procedure to Norwegianelectricity distribution and find that localelectricity distribution is characterised as a naturalmonopoly. Policy implications of the result isalso discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, W. A. and Y. W. Lee (1985) 'The Global Properties of the Miniflex Laurent, Generalized Leontief, and Translog Flexible Functional Forms', Econometrica, 53, 1421-1437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., J. C. Panzar, and R. D. Willig (1988) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breautigam, R. R. and A. F. Daugherty (1983) 'On the Estimation and Returns to Scale using Variable Cost Functions', Economic letters, 11, 25-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and M. W. Trethway (1984) 'Economies of Density Versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ', Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 471-489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and T. Sueyoshi (1988) 'A Goal Programming/Constrained Regression Review of the Bell System Breakup', Management Science 34.

  • Despotakis, K. A. (1986) 'Economic Performance of Flexible Functional Forms', European Economic Review 30, 1107-1143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E., and T. S. Wales (1991) 'Multiproduct Cost Functions and Subadditivity Tests: A Critique of the Evans and Heckman Research on the U.S. Bell System', Discussion Paper No. 91-21, The University of British Columbia.

  • Evans, D. S. and J. J. Heckman (1983a) 'Natural Monopoly', in D. Evans (ed.), Breaking Up Bell. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S. and J. J. Heckman (1983b) 'Multiproduct Cost Function Estimates and Natural Monopoly Tests for the Bell System', in D. Evans (ed.), Breaking Up Bell. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S. and J. J. Heckman (1984) 'A Test for Subadditivity of the Cost Function with an Application to the Bell System', American Economic Review, 74, 615-623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S. and J. J. Heckman (1986) 'A Test for Subadditivity of the Cost Function with an Application to the Bell System: Erratum', American Economic Review, 76, 856-858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1961) 'Hedonic Price for Automobiles: An Econometric Analysis of Quality Change', in The Price Statistics of the Federal Government, General Series No. 73, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuttner, D. A. and J. A. Landnon (1978) 'Electric Utilities: Scale Economies and Dis-economies', Southern Economic Journal, 45, 883-912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. and U. Ben-Zion (1989) 'The Structure of Technology in a Multiproduct Branch Banking Firm', Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7, 489-496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittelsen, S. A. C. (1992) 'Stepwise DEA; Choosing Variables for Measuring Technical Efficiency in Norwegian Electricity Distribution', Working paper, Center for research in economics and business administration, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittelsen, S. A. C. (1994) 'Effektivitet og Regulering i Norsk Elektrisitetsdistribusjon', SNF-report 3/94, Bergen.

  • Neuberg, L. G. (1977) 'Two Issues in the Municipal Ownership of Electric Power Distribution Systems', Bell Journal of Economics, 8, 302-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röller, L.-H. (1990a) 'Modelling Cost Structure — the Bell System Revisited', Applied Economics, 22, 1661-1674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röller, L.-H. (1990b) 'Proper Quadratic Cost Functions with an Application to the Bell System', The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 202-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvanes, K. G. and S. Tjøtta (1994) 'Productivity Differences in Multiple Output Industries: An Empirical Application to Electricity Distribution', Journal of Productivity Analysis, 5, 23-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvanes, K. G. and S. Tjøtta (1995) 'Local Properties of Estimated Flexible Functional Forms', Discussion paper No. 11/95, The Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.

  • Salvanes, K. G. and S. Tjøtta (1998) 'A Note on the Importance of Testing for Regularities for Estimated Flexible Functional Forms', Journal of Productivity Analysis (forthcoming).

  • Shin, R. and J. S. Ying (1992) 'Unnatural Monopolies in Local Telephone', RAND Journal of Economics, 5, 183-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangensteen, I. and E. Dahl (1989) 'An Investigation of Distribution Costs by Means of Regression Analysis', Paper presented at the IEEE 1989 Transmission and Distribution Conference, 1989.

  • Weiss, (1975) 'Antitrust in the Electric Power Industry;, in J. C. Moorhouse (ed.) Electric Power Deregulation and the Public Interest, San Francisco Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.

  • Wyatt, N. S. et al. (1989) 'Performance Measures and Economies of Scale in the New Zealand Electricity Distribution System', Ministry of Energy, Wellington, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A. (1962) 'An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Test for Aggregation Bias', Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 348-368.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salvanes, K.G., Tjøtta, S. A Test for Natural Monopoly with Application to Norwegian Electricity Distribution. Review of Industrial Organization 13, 669–685 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007708912329

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007708912329

Navigation