Abstract
Reorganization of public utilities is on the currentpolitical agenda in many European countries. However,in many cases the most fundamental question in termsof public policy towards these industries is nottested; does the underlying cost structure indicate anatural monopoly or not? Evans and Heckman's analysisof the US Bell System is one of the few exceptions,but their method has a serious problem as theirestimated cost function is not well behaved (negativemarginal costs). To solve this problem we propose touse the consistency region (i.e., the region where theestimated cost function is well behaved) as the testregion. We apply our testing procedure to Norwegianelectricity distribution and find that localelectricity distribution is characterised as a naturalmonopoly. Policy implications of the result isalso discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett, W. A. and Y. W. Lee (1985) 'The Global Properties of the Miniflex Laurent, Generalized Leontief, and Translog Flexible Functional Forms', Econometrica, 53, 1421-1437.
Baumol, W. J., J. C. Panzar, and R. D. Willig (1988) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Breautigam, R. R. and A. F. Daugherty (1983) 'On the Estimation and Returns to Scale using Variable Cost Functions', Economic letters, 11, 25-31.
Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and M. W. Trethway (1984) 'Economies of Density Versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ', Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 471-489.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and T. Sueyoshi (1988) 'A Goal Programming/Constrained Regression Review of the Bell System Breakup', Management Science 34.
Despotakis, K. A. (1986) 'Economic Performance of Flexible Functional Forms', European Economic Review 30, 1107-1143.
Diewert, W. E., and T. S. Wales (1991) 'Multiproduct Cost Functions and Subadditivity Tests: A Critique of the Evans and Heckman Research on the U.S. Bell System', Discussion Paper No. 91-21, The University of British Columbia.
Evans, D. S. and J. J. Heckman (1983a) 'Natural Monopoly', in D. Evans (ed.), Breaking Up Bell. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Evans, D. S. and J. J. Heckman (1983b) 'Multiproduct Cost Function Estimates and Natural Monopoly Tests for the Bell System', in D. Evans (ed.), Breaking Up Bell. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Evans, D. S. and J. J. Heckman (1984) 'A Test for Subadditivity of the Cost Function with an Application to the Bell System', American Economic Review, 74, 615-623.
Evans, D. S. and J. J. Heckman (1986) 'A Test for Subadditivity of the Cost Function with an Application to the Bell System: Erratum', American Economic Review, 76, 856-858.
Griliches, Z. (1961) 'Hedonic Price for Automobiles: An Econometric Analysis of Quality Change', in The Price Statistics of the Federal Government, General Series No. 73, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.
Heuttner, D. A. and J. A. Landnon (1978) 'Electric Utilities: Scale Economies and Dis-economies', Southern Economic Journal, 45, 883-912.
Kim, M. and U. Ben-Zion (1989) 'The Structure of Technology in a Multiproduct Branch Banking Firm', Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7, 489-496.
Kittelsen, S. A. C. (1992) 'Stepwise DEA; Choosing Variables for Measuring Technical Efficiency in Norwegian Electricity Distribution', Working paper, Center for research in economics and business administration, Oslo.
Kittelsen, S. A. C. (1994) 'Effektivitet og Regulering i Norsk Elektrisitetsdistribusjon', SNF-report 3/94, Bergen.
Neuberg, L. G. (1977) 'Two Issues in the Municipal Ownership of Electric Power Distribution Systems', Bell Journal of Economics, 8, 302-323.
Röller, L.-H. (1990a) 'Modelling Cost Structure — the Bell System Revisited', Applied Economics, 22, 1661-1674.
Röller, L.-H. (1990b) 'Proper Quadratic Cost Functions with an Application to the Bell System', The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 202-210.
Salvanes, K. G. and S. Tjøtta (1994) 'Productivity Differences in Multiple Output Industries: An Empirical Application to Electricity Distribution', Journal of Productivity Analysis, 5, 23-43.
Salvanes, K. G. and S. Tjøtta (1995) 'Local Properties of Estimated Flexible Functional Forms', Discussion paper No. 11/95, The Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.
Salvanes, K. G. and S. Tjøtta (1998) 'A Note on the Importance of Testing for Regularities for Estimated Flexible Functional Forms', Journal of Productivity Analysis (forthcoming).
Shin, R. and J. S. Ying (1992) 'Unnatural Monopolies in Local Telephone', RAND Journal of Economics, 5, 183-193.
Wangensteen, I. and E. Dahl (1989) 'An Investigation of Distribution Costs by Means of Regression Analysis', Paper presented at the IEEE 1989 Transmission and Distribution Conference, 1989.
Weiss, (1975) 'Antitrust in the Electric Power Industry;, in J. C. Moorhouse (ed.) Electric Power Deregulation and the Public Interest, San Francisco Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.
Wyatt, N. S. et al. (1989) 'Performance Measures and Economies of Scale in the New Zealand Electricity Distribution System', Ministry of Energy, Wellington, New Zealand.
Zellner, A. (1962) 'An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Test for Aggregation Bias', Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 348-368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salvanes, K.G., Tjøtta, S. A Test for Natural Monopoly with Application to Norwegian Electricity Distribution. Review of Industrial Organization 13, 669–685 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007708912329
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007708912329