Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Values, public policy, and community food security

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Values and beliefs regarding communityfood security were investigated among participants in2–3 day participatory planning events related to thelocal food system in six rural counties from oneregion of upstate New York. The results of Qmethodology reveal three distinct viewpoints: a) theSocial Justice viewpoint, which is primarily concernedwith hunger and the potential harm caused by welfarereform; b) the Pragmatist viewpoint, which values thecontributions agriculture makes to local communitiesand is not concerned about environmental or socialexternalities of the dominant food system; and c) theVisionary viewpoint, which also values agriculture inthe community but is very concerned aboutenvironmental and social externalities. After theplanning events, the Pragmatist viewpoint experiencedan 88% increase in members and the other twoviewpoints became less salient. Various categories ofprofessionals (e.g., nutrition, social welfare,agriculture, environmental) tend to express theviewpoints associated with their professions and/orthe client groups they serve. Despite thesedifferences among participants, the planning events inall six counties resulted in a wide range of goals andobjectives centered on a theme of re-localizing avariety of food system activities. These results arediscussed in relation to the desirability ofdeveloping an explicit philosophy of food andagriculture and the ideal processes required to doso.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J. C. and K. Bernhardt (1995). “Farming practices and adherence to an alternative-conventional agricultural paradigm.” Rural Sociology60(2): 297-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, A. and B. G. Peters (1993). The Politics of Expert Advice. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beus, C. E. and R. E. Dunlap (1990). “Conventional versus alternative agriculture: The paradigmatic roots of the debate.” Rural Sociology55(4): 590-616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beus, C. E. and R. E. Dunlap (1991). “Measuring adher-ence to alternative vs. conventional agricultural paradigms: A proposed scale.” Rural Sociology56(3): 432-460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, D. B. and J. S. Dryzek (1987). Policy Analysis and Design. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyte, H. and N. N. Kari (1996). Building America: The Demo-cratic Promise of Public Work. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, R. C. (1998). Citizen Governance: Leading American Communities into the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, Cali-fornia: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, J. W. and J. Z. Rubin (eds.) (1991). Negotiation Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Program on Negotiation, Harvard Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (1992). “A note on measuring changes in Q factor loadings.” Operant Subjectivity15(2): 56-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (1980). Political Subjectivity.NewHaven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, W. P., J. R. Skees, L. E. Swanson, P. B. Thompson, and L. J. Unnevehr (1992). Sacred Cows and Hot Potatoes: Agrarian Myths in Agricultural Policy. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R. A. B. and J. P. Folger (1994). The Promise of Medi-ation. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1997). “Community-controlled economic devel-opment as a strategic vision for the sustainable agriculture movement.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture12(1): 37-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1994). Challenging the Professions. Frontiers for Rural Development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, K. (1997). “1996 presidential address to the Agri-culture, Food and Human Values Society.” Agriculture and Human Values14: 111-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R. W. and M. H. Ross (1997). Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1979). “Procedural democracy.” In P. Laslett and J. Fishkin, J. (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society,Vol.5. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, K. (1994). Food Policy Councils: The Experience of Five Cities and One County. Unpublished discussions paper. Dept. of Political Science, Western Michigan Univ., Kalamazoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, P. (1997). Democracy and the Policy Sciences.Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W. D. (1994). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. D. (1998). Just Results: Ethical Foundations for Policy Analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. and R. Purser (1996). The Search Conference: A Powerful Method for Planning Organizational Change and Community Action. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esman, M. J. and N. T. Uphoff (1984). Local Organizations: Intermediaries in Rural Development. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1993). The Spirit of Community: The Reinvention of American Society. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Expositor (1992). “A note on measuring changes in Q factor loadings.” Operant Subjectivity15(2): 56-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, G. W. (1997). “Local food system and sustainable communities.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture12(1): 28-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. (1997). “What is Community Food Security?” Urban Ecologist2: 3-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Direc-tions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1993). Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. and F. Fischer (1993). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, North Carolina/ London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, R. and A. Fisher (1996). “Community food security and environmental justice: Searching for a common discourse.” Agriculture and Human Values3(3): 23-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E. (1992). Adult Education for Community Develop-ment. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human Judgment and Social Policy: Incredible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, R. P. (1997). “Agriculture and human values: Past, present, and future directions.” Agriculture and Human Val ue s14: 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaver, R. (1982). Bureaucratic Politics and Incentives in the Management of Rural Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank Staff Working Papers, No. 537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. M. (1989). The Politics of Knowledge: Activist Movements in Medicine and Planning. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, W. (1996). “The value of rural life in American culture.” Rural Development Perspectives12(1): 6-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, C. S. and C. Stivers (1998). Government is Us: Public Administration in an Anti-Democratic Era. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaernes U., L. Holm, M. Ekstrom, E. Furst, and R. Prattala (eds.) (1993). Regulating Markets, Regulating People.Oslo: Novus-Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraak, V., D. Pelletier, U. Uusitalo, and C. McCullum (1998). The Orientations of Food System Stakeholders Concerning Community Food Security: Findings from New York State's North Country. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinsky, J. H. and N. L. Hurley (1994). “On hearing an inter-preting of political messages: A cautionary tale of citizen cue-taking.” The Journal of Politics56(3): 729-751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kweit, M. G. and R. W. Kweit (1981). Implementing Citizen Participation in a Bureaucratic Society. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1980). The Policy-Making Process. Engle-wood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R. (1996). “Rural America as a symbol of American values.” Rural Development Perspectives12(1): 24-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, D. and J. Sobal (eds.) (1995). Eating Agendas: Food and Nutrition as Social Problems. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullum, C., D. Pelletier, V. Kraak, and J. Wilkins (1998). “Understanding issues of participation and power within a community-driven food security initiative in New York's north country.” Paper presented at the Joint Annual Meetings of the Association for the Study of Food and Society and Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society, San Francisco, California, June 4th-7th, 1998.

  • McKnight, J. (1995). The Careless Society: Community and Its Counterfeits. New York: Basic Books (Harper Collins).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1989). Improving Risk Communi-cation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996). Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohls, J. C. and H. Beebout (1993). The Food Stamp Program: Design Tradeoffs, Policy and Impacts. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, D. J. and D. J. Calista (1990). Implementation and the Policy Process: Opening the Black Box. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasour, E. C. Jr. (1990). Agriculture and the State: Market Processes and the Bureaucracy. Oakland, California: The Independent Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, D. L., V. Kraak, C. McCullum, U. Uusitalo, and R. Rich (1999a). “Community food security: Salience and participation at community level.” Agriculture and Human Val ue s16(4): 401-419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, D. L., V. Kraak, C. McCullum, U. Uusitalo, and R. Rich (1999b). “The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: An empirical study from New York's North Country.” Policy Sciences32: 103-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • PQ Method, version 2.0 (1997). Http://www.rz.unibw-muenchen. de/ ¢ p41bsmk/qmethod.

  • Renn, O., T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann (1995). Fai rness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N. C. and P. J. King (1996). Transforming Public Policy: Dynamics of Policy Entrepreneurship and Innovation. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, D. A. and R. W. Cobb (1994). The Politics of Problem Definition. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. and S. M. McLaughlin (1990). “Belief congru-ence between interest-group leaders and members: An empir-ical analysis of three theories and a suggested synthesis.” Journal of Politics52(3): 914-935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, G. (1996). The Social Construction of Expertise. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, M. H. (1998). Going Local: Creating Self-Reliant Communities in a Global Age. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, L. (1998). The Politics of Fat.NewYork: M.E.Sharpe, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. A. (1991). The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SUNY Potsdam (1996). Socio-Economic Profile of the North Country: 1996 Edition. Potsdam, New York; William C.Merwin Rural Services Institute, SUNY Potsdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staples, L. (1997). “Selecting and 'cutting' the issue.” In M. Minkler (ed.), Community Organizing and Community Building for Health. New Brunswick, New Jersey; Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuerle, C. E., E. M. Gramlich, H. Heclo, and D. S. Nightingale (1998). The Government We Deserve: Responsive Democracy and Changing Expectations. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. C. (1995). Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers.San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (1964), (1992). Census of Agriculture. Washington, DC: USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G. (1995). The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, N. (ed.) (1996). Community Strategic Visioning Programs. Westport, Connecticut; Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbord, M. R. (1992). Discovering Common Ground.San Francisco, California: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, R. (1997). “Vertical coordination, producer response, and the locus of control over agricultural production decisions.” Rural Sociology62(4): 491-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zey, M. (1992). Decision-Making: Alternatives to Rational Choice Models. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

    David L. Pelletier, Vivica Kraak, Christine McCullum & Ulla Uusitalo

Authors
  1. David L. Pelletier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vivica Kraak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine McCullum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ulla Uusitalo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pelletier, D.L., Kraak, V., McCullum, C. et al. Values, public policy, and community food security. Agriculture and Human Values 17, 75–93 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007668425322

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007668425322

Search

Navigation