Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 199–208 | Cite as

Stalking the wily multinational: Power and control in the US food system

  • Thomas A. Lyson
  • Annalisa Lewis Raymer

Abstract

The ten largest food and beveragecorporations control over half of the food sales inthe United States and their share may be increasing.Using data from a range of secondary sources, weexamine these corporations and their boards ofdirectors. Social and demographic characteristics ofboard members gleaned from corporate reports, thebusiness press, and elsewhere are presented.Information on interlocking corporate directorates andother common ties among members of the boards ofdirectors show that US based food and beveragecorporations are tied together through a web ofindirect interlocks.

Global food system Interlocking directorates Multinational food corporations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellenir, K. (1999). Diet and Nutrition Sourcebook. Detroit: Omnigraphics.Google Scholar
  2. Bengston, R. E. (1991). A History of the Green Giant Company, 1903–1979. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, W. (1993). Sex, Economy, Freedom and Community. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  4. Bruno, K. (1992). “The corporate capture of the earth summit, ” Multinational Monitor (July–August).Google Scholar
  5. Burt, R. S. (1983). Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Columbus Dispatch (1999). “Heinz to shed diet unit, workers and refocus on food, ” Columbus Dispatch (February 18) (http://cd.columbus.oh.us/news/bus99/feb99/cuts0218.html).Google Scholar
  7. Domhoff, G. W. (1983). Who Rules America Now? A View for the '80s. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-HallS.Google Scholar
  8. Gatlin, G. (1999). “Frito-Lay shuts down Marlboro plant, ” Boston Herald, January 27, p. 31.Google Scholar
  9. Hart, P. (1992). “Marketing agricultural produce, ” in I. R. Bowler (ed.), The Geography of Agriculture in Developed Market Economies (pp. 162–206). New York: JohnWiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Heffernan, W. (1999). Consolidation in the Food and Agriculture System. Report to the National Farmers Union (http://nfu.org).Google Scholar
  11. Hill, S. (1995). “The social organization of boards of directors, ” British Journal of Sociology 46: 245–278.Google Scholar
  12. Ikerd, J. (1993). “The coming renaissance of rural America, ” Paper presented at the Symposium on Rural Community Development. National Center for Appropriate Technology, Ferndale, Arkansas (May 7).Google Scholar
  13. Krebs, A. V. (1992). The Corporate Reapers. Washington, DC: Essential Books.Google Scholar
  14. Lyson, T. A. and C. Geisler (1992). “Toward a second agricultural divide: The restructuring of American agriculture, ” Sociologia Ruralis 32: 248–263.Google Scholar
  15. Lyson, T. A. and J. Green (forthcoming). “The agricultural marketscape: A framework for sustaining agriculture and communities in the Northeast, ” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture.Google Scholar
  16. Madore, J. T. (1993). “Schmitt, 5 grocers charge price-fixing by baby food firms, ” The Buffalo News, January 19.Google Scholar
  17. Mills, C. W. (1956). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). “What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates, ” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 271–298.Google Scholar
  19. Norberg-Hodge, H. (1996). “Shifting direction: From global dependence to local interdependence, ” in J. Mander and E. Goldsmith (eds.), The Case Against the Gloabl Economy (pp. 393–406). San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  20. Patch, E. P. (1995). Plant Closings and Employment Loss in Manufacturing. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  21. Pennings, J. M. (1980). Interlocking Directorates.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Pepsico (1999). 1998 Pepsico Annual Report, Pepsico Factbook (http://www.pepsico.com).Google Scholar
  23. RAFI (Rural Advancement Foundation International) (1999). The Gene Giants: Masters of the Universe? Google Scholar
  24. Ritchie, M. (1993). “NAFTA's grim harvest, free trade and sustainable agriculture, ” Multinational Monitor 14(5).Google Scholar
  25. Robinson, M. (1999). “Three executives get prison sentences in ADM price-fixing case, ” Associated Press, July 10.Google Scholar
  26. Segal, D. (1999). “Justice Department cracks down on price-fixing by vitamin makers, ” Washington Post, March 3, p. E3.Google Scholar
  27. Sonberg, L. (1995). The Health and Nutrient Bible. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  28. Stokman, F. N., R. Zeigler, and J. Scott (eds.) (1985). Networks of Corporate Power: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Countries. New York: Cambridge Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. US Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1978). Interlocking Directorates Among the Major US Corporations, 95th Congress, 2nd Session, Committee Print. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  30. Wentz, L. (1992). “How Martin sees grand Met's global role, ” Advertising Age 63(17): 11–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas A. Lyson
    • 1
  • Annalisa Lewis Raymer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Rural SociologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations