Abstract
Feminist anthropologists have evidenced the social and cultural aspects of motherhood and have challenged the universality of the nuclear family as the basis for residential and child-rearing practices. From a feminist anthropological perspective, the concept of the household has thus been redefined to capture the ways in which different principles of household recruitment and residence shape the activities and access to resources of women and men of different ages and status. This paper examines the relationship between household composition and coffee production in Ocotal Grande, a Popoluca community in the Sierra de Santa Marta in Southern Veracruz, Mexico. It shows that polygamous households are larger and have higher yields of coffee than other types of households. However, this does not mean that all members of the household profit equally from their contribution to coffee production. While some relationship exists between labor input and returns, the distribution of benefits is based on gender and age hierarchies and is open to conflict and dispute.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amadiume, I. (1987). Male Daughters, Female Husbands, Gender and Sex in an African Society. London: Zed Books.
Becker, G. (1981). Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Benería, L. and M. Roldán (1987). The Crossroads of Class and Gender. Industrial Homework, Subcontracting and Household Dynamics in Mexico City. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Blanco, J. (1997). “Planeación participativa para el mejoramiento de la Cafeticultura,” in L. Paré and E. Velázquez (eds.), Gestión de recursos naturales y opciones agroecológicas para la Sierra de Santa Marta (pp. 51-77). Veracruz. Mexico City: UNAM.
Blanco, J. and F. Cruz (1992). “Los hijos de Homshuk: de la autosuficiencia a la escasez de maíz en el sur de Veracruz,” in C. H. de Alcántara (ed.), Reestructuración económica y subsistencia rural. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.
Carney, J. A. and M. Watts (1990). “Manufacturing dissent: Work, gender and the politics of meaning in a peasant Society.” Africa 60(2): 207-233.
Clark, G. (1989). “Separation between trading and home for Asante women in Kumasi central market, Ghana,” in R. Wilk (ed.), The Household Economy. Reconsidering the Domestic Mode of Production. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Clark, M. H. (1984). “Woman-headed households and poverty: Insights from Kenya.” Signs 10: 339-354.
Collier, G. (1978). “The determinants of highland Maya Kinship.” Journal of Family History 3: 439-454.
Collier J. and M. Rosaldo (1981). “Polities and gender in simple societics,” in Ortner and H. Whitehead (eds.), Sexual Meanings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deere, C. D. (1978). “Rural women's subsistence production in the capitalist Periphery.” Review of Radical Political Economics 8(1).
Dwyer, D. and J. Bruce (eds.) (1988). A Home Divided. Women and Income in the Third World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Elson, D. (ed.) (1991). Male Bias in the Development Process. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Engels, F. (1972). The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. New York: International Publishers.
Esparza Salinas, R. (1996). Las mujeres campesinas ante las reformas al Artículo 27 de la Constitución. Mexico City: GIMTRAP.
Evans, A. (1991). “Gender issues in rural household economics.” ISD Bulletin 22: 51-59.
Fapohunda, E. (1988). “The nonpooling household: A challenge to Theory,” in D. Dywer and J. Bruce (eds.), A Home Divided, Women and Income in the Third World. Stanford: University Press.
Folbre, N. (1988). “The black four of hearts: Toward a new paradigm of household Economics,” in D. Dwyer and J. Brude (eds.), A Home Divided. Women and Income in the Third World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Guyer, J. (1988). “Dynamic approaches to domestic budgeting: Cases and methods from Africa,” in D. Dywer and J. Bruce (eds.), A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World. London: Modern Reader.
Hartmann, B. (1995). Reproductive Rights and Wrongs. The Global Politics of Population Control. Boston: South End Press.
Hartmann, H. (1981). “The family as the locus of gender, class and political struggle.” Signs 6: 366-394.
Instituto de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI) (1995). Veracruz. Conteo de población y vivienda 1995. Resultados definitivos. INEGI: Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Leach, M. (1994). Rainforest Relations. Gender and Resource Use Among the Mende of Gola, Sierra Leone. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Mohanty, C. (ed.) (1991). Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana Press.
Moore, H. (1988). Feminism and Anthropology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Olson, B. (1995). “The utility of the household as an analytical tool for medical Anthropology.” Paper presented at the 35th Annual Northeastern Anthropological Association Meeting, Lake Placid, New York, April 2–5.
Paré, L. and E. Velázquez (eds.) (1997). Gestión de recursos naturales y opciones agroecológicas para la Sierra de Santa Marta, Veracruz. Mexico City: UNAM.
Paré, L., E. Velázquez, R. Gutiérrez, F. Ramírez, A. Hernández, M. P. Lozada, H. Perales, and J. L. Blanco (1997). La reserva especial de la biósfera, Sierra de Santa Marta, Veracruz. Diagnóstico y perspectiva. Mexico City: SEMARNAP/UNAM.
Roberts, P. (1991). “Anthropological perspectives on the Household.” IDS Bulletin 22: 60-65.
Saul, M. (1989). “Separateness and relation: Autonomous income and negotiation among rural Bobo Women.” in R. Wilk (ed.), The Household Economy. Reconsidering the Domestic Mode of Production. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Sen, A. (1984). Resources, Values and Development. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stamp, P. (1989). Technology, Gender and Power in Africa. Ottawa: IDRC.
White, B. (1981). “Rural household studies in anthropological perspective,” in H. P. Binswanger (ed.), Rural Household Studies in Asia. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Whitehead, A. (1981). “I am hungry, Mum: The politics of domestic Budgeting,” in K. Young, C. Wolkowitz, and R. McCullagh (eds.), Of Marriage and the Market. London: CSE Books.
Whitehead, A. (1984). “Men, women, kinship and property: Some general issues,” in R. Hirschon (ed.), Women and Property—Women as Property. London: Croom Helm; New York: St. Martin.
Wilk, R. R. (1991). “The household in anthropology: Panacea or problem?” Reviews in Anthropology 20: 1-13.
Wilson, F. (1985). “Women and agricultural change in Latin America.” World Development 13: 1017-1035.
Wolf, D. (1992). Factory Daughters: Gender, Household Dynamics and Rural Industrialization in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.