Abstract
Rural women did not fare very well inthe land reforms carried out during the Latin American“reformist period” of the 1960s and 1970s, with womenbeing under-represented among the beneficiaries. It isargued that women have been excluded from access toand control over water for similar reasons that theywere excluded from access to land during thesereforms. The paper also investigates the extent towhich women have gained or lost access to land duringthe “counter-reforms” of the 1980s and 1990s. Underthe neo-liberal agenda, production cooperatives aswell as communal access to land have largely beenundermined in favor of privatization and theindividual parcelization of collectives. Significantland titling efforts are also being carried outthroughout the region to promote the development of avigorous land market. This latter period has also beencharacterized by the growth of the feminist movementthroughout Latin America and a growing commitment bystates to gender equity. The paper reviews the extentto which rural women‘s access to land and, thus, waterhas potentially been enhanced by recent changes inagrarian and legal codes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acosta, I. and W. Moreno, (1996). “Informe de Honduras: Situacion de la mujer rural y tenencia de la tierra,” Instituto Nacional Agrario, Honduras; paper prepared for the First Central American Conference on “Intercambio de Experiencias sobre Sensibilizacion de Genero con Demandantes de Titulacion Agraria,” December 9–10, Managua, Nicaragua.
Agarwal, B. (1994a). “Gender and command over property: A critical gap in economic analysis and policy in South Asia,” World Development22(10): 1455–1478.
Agarwal, B. (1994b). A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arizpe, L. and C. Botey (1987). “Mexican agricultural development policy and its impact on rural women,” in C. D. Deere and M. Leon (eds.), Rural Women and State Policy: Feminist Perspectives on Latin American Agricultural Development, Ch. 4. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Arroyo, A. and R. Boelens (1997). Mujer campesina e intervencion en el riego andino. Quito: SNV, CESA & CAMAREN.
Boserup, E. (1970). Women's Role in Economic Development. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Botey, C. (1997). “Mujer rural: Reforma agraria y contrareforma,” in J. Aranda, C. Botey, and R. Robles (eds.), Tiempo de Crisis, Tiempos de Mujer. Mexico, D. F.: Centro de Estudios Historicos de la Cuestion Agraria Mexicana and Fundacion Ford, forthcoming.
Bradshaw, S. (1990). “Women in Chilean rural society,” in D. Hojman (ed.), Neo-Liberal Agriculture in Rural Chile, Ch. 6. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Brenes Marin, M. and P. Antezana (1996), “El acceso de la mujer a la tierra en CentroAmerica: Comparacion de seis diagnosticos,” Working Paper prepared for the Fundacion Arias Regional Workshop on El Acceso de la Mujer a la Tierra en CentroAmerica, San Jose, May 30.
Brunt, D. (1995). “Loosing ground: Nicaraguan women and access to land during and after the Sandinista period,” paper presented to the Conference “Agrarian Questions: The Politics of Farming anno 2000,” University of Wageningen, The Netherlands, May 22–24.
Callejas, C. (1983). Examination of Factors Limiting the Organization of Rural Women in Honduras, MA thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Campana, P. (1990). “Mujer y agricultura en America Latina y el Caribe,” Estudios Rurales Latinoamericanos13(3): 243–274.
Campillo, F. (1995). “Sesgos de Genero en Politicas Publicas para el Mundo Rural,” in X. Valdes, A. M. Arteaga, and C. Arteaga (eds.), Mujeres: Relaciones de Genero en la Agricultura(pp. 339–379). Santiago: Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo de la Mujer.
CIDCA-CESA-SNV-CAMAREN(1996). El Riego en la Comunidad andina: una construccion social. Quito.
Deere, C. D. (1985). “Rural women and state policy: The Latin American agrarian reform experience,” World Development13(9): 1037–1053.
Deere, C. D. (1986). “Rural women and agrarian reform in Peru, Chile and Cuba,” in J. Nash and H. Safa (eds.), Women and Change in Latin America, Ch. 10. MA: Bergin & Garvey.
Deere, C. D. (1987). “The Latin American agrarian reform experience,” in C. D. Deere and M. Leon (eds.), Rural Women and State Policy: Feminist Perspectives on Latin American Agricultural Development, Ch. 9. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Deere, C. D. (1990). Household and Class Relations: Peasants and Landlords in Northern Peru. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Deere, C. D. (1995). “What difference does gender make? Rethinking peasant studies,” Feminist Economics1(1): 53–72.
Deere, C. D. and M. Leon (1987). “Introduction,” in C. D. Deere and M. Leon (eds.), Rural Women and State Policy: Feminist Perspectives on Agricultural Development in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Deere, C. D. and M. Leon (1982). Women in Andean Agriculture: Peasant Production and Rural Wage Employment in Colombia and Peru. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Deere, C. D. and M. Leon (1997). “Women and land rights in the Latin American, neo-liberal counter-reforms,” Women in International Development Working Paper #264, Michigan State University.
del Castillo, L. (1994). “Lo Bueno, lo Malo y lo Feo de la legislacion de Aguas,” Debate Agrario(April) 18: 1–20.
Duran, A. (1991). “Informe final. Avances de la 'Politica sobre el papel de la mujer campesina en el desarollo agropecuario',” Bogota, Presidencia de la Republica, Consejeria Presidencial para la Juventud, la Mujer y la Familia, June, mimeo.
Esparza Salinas, R., B. Suarez, and P. Bonfil (1996). Las Mujeres Campesinas ante la Reforma al Articulo 27 de la ConstitucionMexico, D. F.: GIMTRAP, Series Cuadernos de Trabajo, June.
FAO (1992). Situacion Juridica de laMujer Rural en diecinueve paises de America Latina. Rome: FAO.
FAO (1996). Informe: Reunion Regional sobre la mujer rural y la legislacion agraria. Santiago: FAO, Oficina Regional.
Fundacion, A. (1992). El Acceso de la Mujer a la Tierra en El Salvador. San Jose: Fundacion Arias.
Garrett, P. (1982). “Women and agrarian reform: Chile 1964–1973,” Sociologia Ruralis22(1): 17–28.
Gomez-Restrepo, O. (1991). “Politicas para la mujer en el sector rural: Caso de Colombia,” en IICA, Mujer y Modernizacion Agropecuaria: Balance, Perspectivas y Estrategias, Ch. 5. San Jose, Costa Rica: IICA.
Guzman, L. (1991). “Politicas para la mujer rural: Caso de Costa Rica,” en IICA, Mujer y Modernizacion Agropecuaria: Balance, Perspectivas y Estrategias, Ch. 4. San Jose, Costa Rica: IICA.
INCORA (1994). Ley 160 y sus normas reglamentarias. Bogota: Sistema Nacional de Reforma Agraria y Desarollo Rural Campesino, n. d.; law is of August 3.
INIM, Instituto Nicaraguense de la Mujer (1996). “Intercambio de Experiencias sobre el proceso de sensibilizacion de genero con demandantes de titulos agrarias,” paper presented at the First Central American Conference of the same name, Managua, Nicaragua, December 9–10.
INRA/INIM (1996). “Informe de Nicaragua,” paper presented at the First Central American Conference on “Intercambio de Experiencias sobre el proceso de sensibilizacion de genero con demandantes de titulos agrarios,” Managua, December 9–10.
Kay, C. (1995). “Rural Latin America: Exclusionary and uneven agricultural development,” in S. Halebsky and R. Harris (eds.), Capital, Power and Inequality in Latin America(pp. 21–51). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Krawczyk, M. (1993). “Women in the region: Major changes,” CEPAL Review(April) 49: 7–19.
Krol, M. (n. d.). “Gender and water rights in Pungales, Ecuador,” paper prepared for the lecture series “Irrigation and Development.” Lago, M. (1987). “Rural women and the neo-liberal model in Chile,” in C. D. Deere and M. Leon (eds.), Rural Women and State Policy: Feminist Perspectives on Agricultural Development in Latin America, Ch. 1. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Leon, M. (1987). “Columbian agricultural policies and the debate on policies toward rural women,” in C. D. Deere and M. Leon (eds.), Rural Women and State Policy: Feminist Perspectives on Agricultural Development in Latin America, Ch. 5. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Leon, M., P. Prieto, and M. C. Salazar (1987). “Acceso de la Mujer a la Tierra en America Latina. Panorama General y Estudios de Caso de Honduras y Colombia”, en FAO, Mujeres Campesinas en America Latina: Desarrollo Rural, Migracion, Tierra y Legislacion(pp. 3–80). Santiago, Chile: FAO.
Luciak, I. (1996). “Gender and democratization in El Salvador,” paper presented at the 1996 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 29–September 1.
Lynch, B. D. (1991). “Women and irrigation in Highland Peru,” Society and Natural Resources4: 37–52.
Madden, L. (1992). El Acceso de la Mujer a la Tierra en Costa Rica. San Jose: Fundacion Arias.
Matear, A. (1997). “Gender and the State in rural Chile,” Bulletin of Latin American Research16(1): 97–105.
Medrano, D. (1996). “Recursos Productivos y la Participacion: aspectos juridicos en el caso de la mujer rural en Colombia,” paper presented at the Regional Meeting on Agrarian Legislation, FAO, Lima, April.
Ministerio de Agricultura y Desearrollo Rural-INCORA-DNPen Asocio con el Banco Mundial (1997). “El Mercado de Tierras, Ley 160 de 1994, Manual Operativo de Prueba,” Bogota, Proyecto de Apoyo al Programa de Reforma Agraria (Fase Experimental), May.
Navarro, W., A. Vallejo, and X. Villaverde (1996). Tierra para la Vida. Quito: Fondo Ecuatoriano Populorum Progressio.
Phillips, L. (1987). “Women, development and the State in Rural Ecuador,” in C. D. Deere and M. Leon (eds.), Rural Women and State Policy, Ch. 6. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Roeder, M. (1994). “Genero y Riego,” Agua y Riego(3): 23–24.
Roeder, M. (1996). “Genero y Riego: La Mujer y su Participacion en los Proyectos de Riego,” Agua y Riego(8): 19–22.
Roquas, E. (1995). “Gender, agrarian property and the politics of inheritance in Honduras,” paper presented at the Conference “Agrarian Questions: The Politics of Farming anno 2000,” University of Wageningen, The Netherlands, May 22–24.
Stephen, L. (1996). “Too little, too late? The impact of Article 27 on women in Oaxaca,” in L. Randall (ed.), Reforming Mexico's Agrarian Reform, Ch. 25. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Tala Japaz, A. (n. d.). Codigo de Aguas. Santiago: Ed. Juridica ConoSur.
Valcarcel Carnero, M. (1997). “Genero y Riego: una Mirada Optimista,” Agua y Riego(9): 27–30.
van der Pol, I. (n. d.). “Claro, Hay que Pelear el Agua: roles de genero en las actividades de riego,” SNV-Peru.
Vattune, M. E. (1996). “Genero, Riego y Desarollo rural,” paper presented to the Seminar on Gender Relations, Universidad Catolica del Peru, July.
Viquez Astorga, J. (1996). “Situacion de la Mujer y la tenencia de la tierra en Costa Rica,” Instituto de Desarollo Agrario, Programa Mujer y Familia, San Jose, Costa Rica, paper presented to the First Central American Conference on “Intercambio de Experiencias sobre Sensibilizacion de Genero con demandantes de titulacion agraria,” Managua, Nicaragua, December 9–10.
Zwarteveen, M. (1994). “Gender issues, water issues: A gender perspective to irrigation management,” International Irrigation Management Institute Working Paper No. 32.
Zwarteveen, M. (1997). “Water: From basic need to commodity, a discussion on gender and water rights in the C of irrigation,” World Development(August).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deere, C.D., Leon, M. Gender, land, and water: From reform to counter-reform in Latin America. Agriculture and Human Values 15, 375–386 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007589103233
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007589103233