Abstract
Innovative models that focus on learning outcomes engage faculty in new ways of facilitating and assessing learning, while their institutions seek to support and reward their participation. Innovators from four different institutions provide an overview of their approaches to implementing principles of outcomes-based education, compare their models, and explore the changes that are precipitated in the roles, rewards, resources, structures, and models. While the four institutions and models differ on several significant variables, the innovators identify common key elements and issues that the academy must address in order to transform the educational experience and culture to a more learning-centered enterprise.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astin, A. (1992). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27 (6), 13-25.
Davis, J. R. (1995). Reengineering teaching for the 21st century. Educational Record, 76 (4), 16-22.
Dolence, M. G., & Norris, D. M. (1995). Transforming higher education: A vision for learning in the 21st century. Ann Arbor: Society for College and University Planning.
Fiddler, McGury, Marienau, Rogers, & Schneideman (1996). Broadening the scope of scholarship: A suggested framework. Innovative Higher Education, 21, 127-140.
Guskin, A. E. (1994). Reducing student costs and enhancing student learning. Change, 26 (5), 16-25.
McDaniel, E. A., & Colarulli, G. C. (1996). Placing learning at the center of the institution: Challenges and implications. Perspectives, 26 (1), 81-87.
Plater, W. M. (1995). Future work: Faculty time in the 21st century. Change, 27 (3), 22-33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDaniel, E.A., Felder, B.D., Gordon, L. et al. New Faculty Roles in Learning Outcomes Education: The Experiences of Four Models and Institutions. Innovative Higher Education 25, 143–157 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007529007265
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007529007265