Skip to main content
Log in

Collective action in watershed management -- experiences from the Andean hillsides

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Watersheds constitute a special case of multiple-use common pool resources (CPRs). In a textual sense, watersheds tend to be mosaics of privately owned and managed patches of land. At the same time, however, watersheds are also ecosystems in which multiple resources and people interact through an infinity of bio-physical processes. Through such interaction, new watershed-level qualities emerge that, together with other factors, condition watershed users' continued resource use and access. In this perspective, watersheds become common-pool resources. Hence, watershed users do not only manage their individual plots, crops, forests, etc., knowingly or not, they manage landscape patterns and bio-physical processes that transcend their private property. In this context, drawing on experiences gained through participatory action research in a micro-watershed in the Andean hillsides of southern Colombia, this paper describes a process aimed at fostering collective watershed management. The paper illustrates the importance of platforms as a mechanism for negotiating and coordinating collective action by multiple users and discusses the issues of representation on such platforms as well as the importance of third party facilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri, M. (1987). Agroecology. The Scientific Basis of Alternative Agriculture. Westview Special Studies in Agriculture Science and Policy.

  • Barrett, G. W. (1992). “Landscape ecology: Designing sustainable agricultural landscapes,” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2: 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, V. (1996). An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernea, M. (1988). “Alternative social forestry development strategies,” in J. Ives and D. C. Pitt (eds.), Deforestation. Social Dynamics in Watershed and Mountain Ecosystems (pp. 159–190). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimble, R. and K. Wellard. (1997). “Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities,” Agricultural Systems 55: 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. and Y. Lincoln. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, María del Pilar (1997). “Guía para formular proyectos en ASOBESURCA,” in mimeo.

  • IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) (1995). Concepts and Issues in Watershed Management. WP-2/95. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, Evaluation Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. R. (1996). “Watershed development: Concept and issues,” in J. R. Jensen, S. L. Seth, T. Sawhney, and R. Kumar (eds.), Watershed Development — Emerging Issues and Framework for Action Plan for Strengthening a Learning Process at All Levels (pp. 43–63). Dehli, India: Proceedings of Danida's International Workshop on Watershed Development, Hubli and Bangalore, India, December 1995. WDCU Publication No. 1.

  • Ostrom, E. (1994). Neither Market nor State: Governance of Common-pool Resources in the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, Lecture Series 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom. E. (1995). “Constituting social capital and social action,” in R. O. Keohane and E. Ostrom (eds.), Local Commons and Global Interdependence, Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains (pp. 125–160). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravnborg, H. M. and J. A. Ashby (1996). Organising for Local-level Watershed Management: Lessons from Río Cabuyal Watershed, Colombia. ODI Agricultural Research and Extension Network. Overseas Development Institute, Network Paper No. 65.

  • Ravnborg, H. M. and M. del Pilar Guerrero (1996). “Poverty profiles for designing and evaluating rural research and development activities A methodology,” in CIAT Hillsides Program Annual Report 1994–1995 (pp. 165–202). Cali: Centro Internacional de Agricultural Tropical.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravnborg, H. M., J. A. Ashby, M. del Pilar Guerrero, and J. E. Rubiano (1996). “Burning in hillsides farming. Experiments with a stakeholder approach for conflict resolution,” ILEIA Newsletter 12: 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, D. (1997). “Shared spaces and sub-divided interests in the uncommons: Gendered forests, tree farms, and gardens in the agroforest of Zambrana-Chacuey,” The Common Property Resource Digest 40: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. (1994). “Communication support for sustainable natural resource management,” IDS Bulletin 25: 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, P. (1994). “Participatory watershed management in India: The experience of the Aga Khan Rural Support Programme,” in I. Scoones and J. Thompson (eds.), Beyond Farmer First. Rural People's Knowledge, Agricultural Research and Extension Practice (pp. 117–124). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steins, N. A. and V. M. Edwards (1999). “Platforms for collective action in multiple-use common-pool resources,” Agriculture and Human Values 16(3): 241–255 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff, N. (1992). Learning from Gal Oya. Possibilities for Participatory Development and Post-Newtonian Social Science. Cornell University Press.

  • Uphoff, N. (1994). “Local organizations for supporting people-based agricultural research and extension: Lessons from Gal Oya, Sri Lanka,” in I. Scoones and J. Thompson (eds.), Beyond Farmer First. Rural People's Knowledge, Agricultural Research and Extension Practice (pp. 213–220). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ravnborg, H.M., Guerrero, M.d.P. Collective action in watershed management -- experiences from the Andean hillsides. Agriculture and Human Values 16, 257–266 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007522912099

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007522912099

Navigation