Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Utilizing a social ethic toward the environment in assessing genetically engineered insect-resistance in trees

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social policies are used to regulate how members of a society interact and share resources. If we expand our sense of community to include the ecosystem of which we are a part, we begin to develop an ethical obligation to this broader community. This ethic recognizes that the environment has intrinsic value, and each of us, as members of society, are ethically bound to preserve its sustainability. In assessing the environmental risks of new agricultural methods and technologies, society should not freely trade economic gains for ecological damage, but rather seek practices that are compatible with ecosystem health. This approach is used to evaluate the environmental risks associated with genetically engineered insect-resistant trees. The use of insect-resistant trees is a biologically based pest control strategy that has several advantages over pesticide use. However, the use of genetically engineered trees presents particular ecological concerns because the trees are long lived and often are not highly domesticated. The main environmental concerns reviewed include: (1) adaptation of pests to the trees, leading to a non-sustainable agricultural practice, (2) transgenic trees producing environmental toxins, (3) insect resistance enhancing the invasiveness of the tree, causing it to become weedy or invade wild habitats, and (4) transfer of the transgene to wild or feral relatives of the tree, possibly increasing the invasiveness of weeds or wild plants. Some methods are available to offset these risks; however, the environmental risks associated with this technology have been poorly researched and need to be more clearly identified so that when we evaluate the risks, it is based on the best information obtainable. To fulfil an ethical obligation to the environment, public policies and government regulations are needed to preserve the sustainability of both the environment and the future of our production systems. A better understanding of both the ecological issues and of genetic engineering in general are needed on the part of citizens and policy makers alike to ensure that sound environmental decisions are made. Otherwise, the environmental benefits of this technology, mainly decreasing the use of more toxic pesticides in tree crops and forests, will either be lost or traded for other environmental hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addison, J. A. (1993), “Persistence and nontarget effects of Bacillus thuringiensis in soil: A review,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 2329–2342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, D. W., J. H. Benedict, and E. S. Sachs (1996), “Transgenic plants for the development of durable insect resistance,” in G. B. Collins and R. J. Sheppard (eds.), Engineering plants for commercial products and applications [Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 792] (pp. 106–114). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balciunas, J. K., D. W. Burrows, and M. F. Purcells (1994), “Field and laboratory host ranges of the Australian wee-vil, Oxyops vitiosa (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a potential biological control agent for the paperbark tree, Melaleuca quinquenervia,” Biological Control 4: 351–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, I. G. (1980), Technology, environment, and human values. New York: Praeger Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. C. H. (1983), “Crop mimicry in weeds,” Economic Botany 37: 255–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. S. (1995), “Resistance: A threat to the insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis,” Florida Entomologist 87: 414–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, D. R., J. T. Greenplate, E. Y. Wong, and J. P. Pur-cell (1994), “Cloning of an insecticidal cholesterol oxidase gene and its expression in bacteria and in plant protoplasts,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60: 4239–4244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M. J. (1989), “Insect herbivores and plant population dynamics,” Annual Review of Entomology 34: 531–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crickmore, N., D. R. Zeigler, J. Feitelson, E. Schnepf, D. Lereclus, J. Baum, J. Van Rie, and D. H. Dean (1997), Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin nomenclature. WWWsite http://www.susx.ac.uk/Home/Neil Crickmore/Bt/ index.html.

  • Croft, B. A. (1992), “IPMsystems that conserve pesticides, pest resistant plants and biological controls, including geneti-cally altered forms,” Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 55: 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denholm, I., and M. W. Rowland (1992), “Tactics for Managing pesticide resistance in arthropods: theory and practice,” Annual Review of Entomology 37: 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, S. R., and G. L. Bush (1984), “An evolutionary and applied perspective of insect biotypes,” Annual Review of Entomology 29: 471–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donegan, K. K., C. J. Palm, V. J. Fieland, L. A. Porteous, L. M. Ganio, D. L. Schaller, L. Q. Bucao, and R. J. Seidler (1995), “Changes in levels, species, and DNA fingerprints of soil microorganisms associated with cotton expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki endotoxin,” Applied Soil Ecology 2: 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover, M. J., and B. A. Croft (1986), “Pesticide resistance and public policy,” BioScience 36: 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D. D., D. E. McCabe, S. McInnis, R. Ramachandran, D. R. Russell, K. M. Wallace, B. J. Martinell, D. R. Roberts, K. F. Raffa, and B. H. McCown (1993), “Stable transformation of Picea glauca by particle acceleration,” Bio/Technology 11: 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S. (1989), Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flexner, J. L, P. H. Westigard, R. Hilton, and B. A. Croft (1995), “Experimental evaluation of resistance management for twospotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on southern Oregon pear,” Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 1517–1524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K. J., J. A. Browning, and M. D. Simons (1977), “Management systems for host genes to control disease loss,” Annals of the New York Academy of Science 287: 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatehouse, A. M. R., V. A. Hilder, K. S. Powell, M. Wang, G. M. Davison, L. N. Gatehouse, R. E. Down, H. S. Edmonds, D. Boulter, C. A. Newell, A. Merryweather, W. D. O. Hamilton, and J. A. Gatehouse (1994), “Insect-resistant transgenic plants: choosing the gene to do the ‘job’,” Biochemical Society Transactions 22: 944–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, G. (1986), “Factors influencing the evolution of resistances,” in National Research Council (ed.), Pesticide resistance: Strategies and tactics for management (pp. 157–169). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granahan, G. H., C. A. Leslie, A. M. Dandekar, S. L. Uratsu, and I. E. Yates (1993), “Transformation of pecan and regeneration of transgenic plants,” Plant Cell Reports 12: 634–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haissig, B. E. (1995), Benefits and detriments of deploying genetically engineered woody biomass crops. Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI TR-104896, Project 3407.

  • Hokkanen, H. M. T., and C. H. Wearing (1994), “A safe and rational deployment of Bacillus thuringiensis genes in crop plants: Conclusions and recommendations of OECD work-shop on ecological implications of transgenic crops containing Bt-toxin genes,” Biocontrol Science and Technology 4: 399–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, R. D. (1990), “Moral responsibility, values, and making decisions about biotechnology,” in S. M. Gendel, A. D. Kline, D. M. Warren and F. Yates (eds.), Agricultural bioethics: Implications of agricultural biotechnology (pp. 279–291). Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, L. G., D. L. Pluckett, J. V. Pancho, and J. P. Herberger (1977), The worlds worst weeds. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immaraju, J. A., J. G. Morse, and R. F. Hobza (1990), “Field evaluation of insecticide rotation and mixtures as strategies for citrus thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) resistance management in California,” Journal of Economic Entomology 83: 306–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R. R., S. P. DiFazio, A. M. Brunner, and S. H. Strauss (in review), “Environmental effects of genetically engineered woody biomass crops,” Biomass and Bioenergy.

  • Johnson, M. T., and F. Gould (1992), “Interaction of genetically engineered host plant resistance and natural enemies of Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in tobacco,” Environmental Entomology 21: 586–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongsma, M. A., P. L. Bakker, J. Peters, D. Bosch, and W. J. Stiekema (1995), “Adaptation of Spodoptera exigua larvae to plant proteinase inhibitors by induction of gut proteinase insensitive to inhibition,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Science 92: 8041–8045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansmoentalib, S. (1996), “Science and values in risk assessment: the case of deliberate release of genetically engineered organisms,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9: 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiding, J. (1986), “Prediction or resistance risk assessment,” in National Research Council (ed.), Pesticide resistance: Strategies and tactics for management (pp. 279–297). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. G., F. Gould, O. M. B. Deponti, and R. E. Stinner (1987), “Ecological, agricultural, genetic, and commercial considerations in the deployment of insect-resistant germplasm,” Environmental Entomology 16: 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyosawa, S. (1982), “Genetics and epidemiological modeling of breakdown of plant disease resistance,” Annual Review of Phytopathology 20: 93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzweiser, D. P., J. L. Gringorten, D. R. Thomas, and J. T. Butcher (1996), “Functional effects of the bacterial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki on aquatic microbial communities,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 33: 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, H. (1995), Rationality and ethics in agriculture. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, K. J., and R. J. Czochor (1980), “Theory of genetic interactions among populations of plants and their pathogens,”Annual Review of Phytopathology 18: 237–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1966), A Sand County almanac, with essays on conservation from Round River. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplè, J. C., M. Bonadè-Bottino, S. Augustin, G. Pilate, V. D. Lê Tân, A. Delplaque, D. Cornu, and L. Jouanin (1995), “Toxicity to Chrysomela tremulae (Coleoptera: Chryso-melidae) of transgenic poplars expressing a cysteine proteinase inhibitor,” Molecular Breeding 1: 319–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallet, J., and P. Porter (1992), “Preventing insect adaptation to insect-resistant crops: Are seed mixtures or refugia the best strategy?,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of LondonB250: 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manasse, R., and P. Kareiva (1991), “Quantifying the spread of recombinant genes and organisms,” in L. R. Ginzburg (ed.), Assessing ecological risks of biotechnology (pp. 215–231). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M., and A. P. Dobson (1986), “Population dynamics and the rate of evolution of pesticide resistance,” in National Research Council (ed.), Pesticide resistance: Strategies and tactics for management (pp. 170–193). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCown, B. H., D. E. McCabe, D. R. Russell, D. J. Robinson, K. A. Barton, and K. E. Raffa (1991), “Stable transformation of Populus and incorporation of pest-resistance by electric discharge particle acceleration,” Plant Cell Reports 9: 590–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaughey, W. H., and M. E. Whalon (1992), “Managing insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins,” Science 258: 1451–1455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, T., and J. D. Hare (1995), “Integration of host plant resistance and Bacillus thuringiensis insecticides in the management of lepidopterous pests of celery,” Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 1787–1794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm, C. J., K. Donegan, D. Harris, and R. J. Seidler (1994), “Quantification in soil of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki δ-endotoxin from transgenic plants,” Molecular Ecology 3: 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm, C. J., D. L. Schaller, K. K. Donegan, and R. J. Seidler (1996), “Persistence in soil of transgenic plant produced Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki δ-endotoxin,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology (in press).

  • Pang, S. Z., S. M. Oberhaus, J. L. Rasmussen, and D. C. Knipple (1992), “Expression of a gene encoding a scorpion insecto-toxin peptide in yeast, bacteria and plants,” Gene 116: 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D. (1995), “Amounts of pesticides reaching target pests: Environmental impacts and ethics,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8: 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., H. Acquay, M. Biltonen, P. Rice, M. Silva, J. Nelson, V. Lipner, S. Giordano, A. Horowitz, and M. D'Amore (1992), “Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use,” BioScience 42: 750–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffa, K. F. (1989), “Genetic engineering of trees to enhance resistance to insects,” BioScience 39: 524–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regal, P. J. (1994), “Scientific principles for ecologically based risk assessment of transgenic organisms,” Molecular Ecology 3: 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissler, J., and M. Mellon (1993), Perils amidst the promise, ecological risks of transgenic crops in a global market. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissler, J., and M. Mellon (1996), The ecological risks of engineered crops. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. J., B. H. McCown, and K. Raffa (1994), “Responses of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) and forest tent caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) to transgenic poplar, Populus spp., containing a Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin gene,” Environmental Entomology 23: 1030–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafroth, P. B., G. T. Auble, and M. L. Scott (1995), “Germination and establishment of the native plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides Marshall subspp. monilifera) and the exotic Russian-olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.),” Conservation Biology 9: 1169–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D. I., G. K. Podila, and D. F. Karnosky (1994), “Transgenic larch expressing genes for herbicide and insect resistance,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24: 2059–2067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S. H., W. H. Rottman, A. M. Brunner, and L. A. Sheppard (1995), “Genetic engineering of reproductive sterility in forest trees,” Molecular Breeding 1: 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B. E. (1994a), “Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis,” Annual Review of Entomology 39: 47–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B. E. (1994b), “Delaying insect adaptation to trans-genic plants: Seed mixtures and refugia reconsidered,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B255: 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, H., and G. Stotzky (1995), “Insecticidal activity of the toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki and tenebrionis adsorbed and bound on pure clay soils,” Applied Environmental Microbiology 61: 1786–1790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B. (1995), The spirit of the soil: Agriculture and environmental ethics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B., R. J. Johnson, and E. O. van Ravenswaay (1994), Ethics, policy, and Agriculture. New York: Mac-millan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoms, E. M., and T. F. Watson (1986), “Effect of Dipel (Bacillus thuringiensis on the survival of immature and adult Hyposoter exiguae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae),” Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 47: 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedje, J. M., R. K. Colwell, Y. L. Grossman, R. E. Hodson, R. E. Lenski, R. N. Mack, and P. J. Regal (1989), “The planned introduction of genetically engineered organisms: Ecological considerations and recommendations,” Ecology 70: 298–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA, APHIS, and BBEP (1996), Biotechnology permits. WWWsite http://www.aphis.usda.gov/bbep/bp/status.html.

  • Wallner, W. E., R. N. Dubois, and P. S. Grinberg (1983), “Alteration of parasitism by Rogas lymantriae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Bacillus thuringiensis-stressed gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) hosts,” Journal of Economic Entomology 76: 275–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M. (1996), “PGS-AgrEvo deal stirs up plant biotechnology,” Nature Biotechnology 14: 1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wearing, C. H., and H. M. T. Hokkanen (1995), “Pest resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis: Ecological crop assessment for Bt gene incorporation and strategies of management,” in H. M. T. Hokkanen and J. M. Lynch (eds.), Biological control: Costs and benefits (pp. 236–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wipfli, M. S., and R. W. Merritt (1994), “Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis on nontarget benthic insects through direct and indirect exposure,” Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13: 190–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, B. R. (1994), “Plant resistance to insects in integrated pest management,” Plant Disease 78: 927–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrubel, R. P., S. Krimsky, and R. E. Wetzler (1992), “Field testing transgenic plants,” BioScience 42: 280–289.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA

    R. R. James

Authors
  1. R. R. James
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

James, R.R. Utilizing a social ethic toward the environment in assessing genetically engineered insect-resistance in trees. Agriculture and Human Values 14, 237–249 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007408811726

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007408811726

Search

Navigation