Skip to main content
Log in

Should arthropod parasitoids and predators be subject to host range testing when used as biological control agents?

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Testing of candidate biological control agents to estimate their likely field host ranges in the area of release has been part of weed biological control for several decades, with evolving techniques and goals. Similar efforts have been made less often for parasitoids and predators being introduced for arthropod biological control. Here, we review both techniques of host range testing and social objectives of such screening. We ask whether agents introduced for arthropod biological control should be subjected to host range testing before release, and if so, are methods used for estimating host ranges of herbivorous arthropods appropriate, or are different approaches needed. Current examples in which host range testing has been employed for arthropod biological control are reviewed. We conclude with recommendations concerning guiding principles about use of host range testing. We recommend modest expansion of host range testing for arthropod biological control for projects on continents. We recommend more extensive testing for projects of introduction onto islands. We note that introductions to islands could provide opportunities to gain experience in use of host range estimation for this class of organisms and to conduct post release evaluations of host ranges. We urge caution in efforts to mandate host range testing but simultaneously recommend consultation between biological control workers and insect conservationists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam, M. M., F. D. Bennett, and K. P. Carl (1971), Biological control of Diatraea sacharalis (F.) in Barbados by Apanteles flavipes Cam. and Lixophaga diatraeae T.T., ” Entomophaga 16: 151–158.

  • Andow, D. A., C. P. Lane, and D. M. Olson (1995), “The use of Trichogramma in maize-estimating environmental risks,” in H. M. T. Hokkanen and J. M. Lynch (eds.), Biological control: Benefits and risks (pp. 101–118). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andres, L. A., C. J. Davis, P. Harris, and A. J. Wapshere (1976), “Biological control of weeds,” in C. B. Huffaker and P. S. Messenger (eds.), Theory and practice of biological control (pp. 481–519). New York: Academic Press. Anon. (1987), “A fungus released to help control Port Jackson ‘willow’,” Plant Protections News, South Africa 8: 1. Anon. (1992), Expert consultation on guidelines for introduction of biological control agents. Rome, Italy: FAO, September 17- 19, 1991. Anon. (1993), Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States. Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology Assessment Report OTF-F-565. Anon. (1996), “Successful control of Orthezia insignis - gumwoods saved in St. Helena!,” in International Institute of Biological Control, Annual Report, 1995 (pp. 12- 14).Wallingford, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaud, P. H., Jr. (1978), A host-parasite catalog of North American Tachinidae (Diptera). Washington, DC: US Depart-ment of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration, Misc. Publication No. 1319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, P. T. (1989), “The millipede parasitoid Pelidnoptera nigripennis (F.) (Diptera: Sciomyzidae) for the biological control of the millipede Ommatoiulus moreleti (Lucas) (Diplopoda: Julida: Julidae) in Australia,” Bulletin of Ento-mological Research 79: 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balciunas, J. K., D. W. Burrows, and M. F. Purcell (1996), “Comparison of the physiological and realized host-ranges of a biological control agent fromAustralia for the control of the aquatic weed, Hydrilla verticillata,” Biological Control 7: 148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, B. I. P., A. A. Evans, C. M. Ferguson, G. Barker, M. R. McNeill, and C. B. Philips (1997a), “Laboratory non-target host range of the introduced parasitoids Microctonus aethiopoides and M.hyperodae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) compared with field parasitism in New Zealand,” Environmental Entomology 26: 694–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, B. I. P., C. M. Ferguson, and A. A. Evans (1997b), “Implications of the effects of introduced biological control agents on native and beneficial non-target species,” in M. Purcell (ed.), Balancing nature: Assessing the impact of importing exotic biological control agents: An international perspective. Lanham, MD: Thomas Say Publications, Entomological Society of America (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, F. D. (1993), “Do introduced parasitoids displace native ones?,” Florida Entomologist 76: 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodle, M. J., A. P. Ferriter, and D. D. Thayer (1994), “The biology, distribution, and ecological consequences of Melaleuca quinquenervia in the Everglades,” in S. M. Davis and J.C. Ogden(eds.),Everglades: The ecosystem and its restoration (pp. 341–355). Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breytenbach, G. J. (1986), “Impacts of alien organisms on terrestrial communities with emphasis on communities of the southwestern Cape,” in I. A. W. Macdonald, F. J. Kruger and A. A. Ferrar (eds.), The ecology and management of biological invasions in Southern Africa, proceedings of the national synthesis symposium on the ecology of biological invasions (pp. 229–238). Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briese, D. T., A. W. Sheppard, and J. W. Reifenberg (1995), “Open-field host-specificity testing for potential biological control agents of Onopordum thistles,” Biological Control 5: 158–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, G. R., E. A. Okrah, and M. Christian-Meier (1991), “Laboratory biology and host range of Hydrellia balciunasi (Diptera: Ephydridae),” Entomophaga 36: 575–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, M. (1984), “The potential host ranges in Australia of some imported aphid parasites (Hymen.: Ichneumonoidea: Aphidiidae),” Entomophaga 29: 351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, S. L., and M. Cristofaro (1995), “Open-field tests in host-specificity determination of insects for biological control of weeds,” Biocontrol Science and Technology 5: 395–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, S. L., and R. Sobhian (1991), “Host-use patterns of capitulum-feeding insects of yellow starthistle: Results from a garden plot in Greece,” Environmental Entomology 20: 724–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppel, H. C., and J. W. Mertins (1977), Biological insect pest suppression. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, Q. C. B., and J. L. Fuller (1995), Plant invaders: the threat to natural ecosystems. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, S. S. (1922), Apanteles melanoscelus, an imported parasite of the gypsy moth. US Department of Agriculture, Bulletin No. 1028.

  • Day, W. H. (1996), “Evaluation of biological control of the tarnished plant bug (Hemiptera: Miridae) in alfalfa by the introduced parasite Peristenus digoneutis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae),” Environmental Entomology 25: 512–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBach, R. (1974), Biological control by natural enemies. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfosse, E. S., R. G. Lewis, and S. Hasan (1995), “Release of Uromyces heliotropii in Australia: A key agent in the integrated pest management system for common heliotrope,” in E. S. Delfosse and R. R. Scott (eds.), Proceedings of the eighth international symposium on biological control of weeds, February 2- 7, 1992 (pp. 329–336). Lincoln Univer-sity, Canterbury, New Zealand. DSIR/CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.

  • de Polania, I. Z., and O. M. Wilches (1992), “Impacto eco-logico de la hormiga loca, Paratrechina fulva (Mayr), en el municipio de Cimitarra (Santander),” Revista Colombiana de Entomologia 18: 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, J. J., and R. H. Messing (1996), “Response of two opiine fruit fly parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to the lan-tana gall fly (Diptera: Tephritidae),” Environmental Entomology 25: 1428–1432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, N., and R. Kieckhefer (1996), Oecologia 105: 537–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, R. P., and S. M. Darby (1991), “Host specificity of the parasitoid, Sphecophaga vesparum (Curtis) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a potential biological control agent of the social wasps, Vespula germanica (Fabricius) and V.vulgaris (Linnaeus) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in Australia,” New Zealand Journal of Zoology 18: 193–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, R. P., and R. M. Kwong (1994), “Biological control of the elm leaf beetle,” Plant Protection Quarterly9(2): 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funasaki, G. Y., P. Y. Lai, L. M. Nkahara, J. W. Beardsley, and A. K. Ota (1988), “A review of biological control introductions in Hawaii: 1890 to 1985,” Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 28: 105–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, W. C., and F. G. Howarth (1985), “Conservation status of endemic Hawaiian Lepidoptera,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Congress on European Lepidopterology, Cambridge, 1982 (pp. 74–84). Karlsruhe, Germany: Societas Europeaea Lepidopterologica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K. J. (1991), “The magnitude of global insect species richness,” Conservation Biology 5: 283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, P. A., and T. M. O'Dell (1977), “Alternate hosts of Blepharipa pratensis (Meigen),” Forest Service Research Note, No. NE-245.

  • Goeden, R. D., and L. T. Kok (1986), “Comments on a proposed ‘new’ approach for selecting agents for the biological control of weeds,” Canadian Entomologist 118: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, T. (1996), Darwin's dreampond, drama in Lake Victoria. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, T., F. Witte, and J. Wanink (1993), “Cascading effects of the introduced Nile perch on the detritivorous/phytoplanktivorous species in the sublittoral areas of LakeVictoria, ” Conservation Biology 7: 686–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldson, S. L., and C. B. Phillips (1993), “Science and biolog-ical control,” in R. A. Prestidge (ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Australasian Grassl.Invert.Ecol.Conf. (pp. 63–74). Hamilton, New Zealand: AgResearch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldson, S. L., M. R. McNeill, C. B. Phillips, and J. R. Proffitt (1992), “Host specificity testing and suitability of the parasitoid Microctonus hyperodae (Hym.: Braconidae, Euphorinae) as a biological control agent of Listronotus bonariensis (Col.: Curculionidae) in New Zealand,” Ento-mophaga 37: 483–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greathead, D. J. (1995), “Benefits and risks of classical biological control,” in H. M. T. Hokkanen and J. M. Lynch (eds.), Biological control: Benefits and risks (pp. 53–63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grijpma, P., J. C. van Lenteren, and L. M. Sonderen (1991), “Host specificity and oviposition behaviour of Telenomus nitidulus, egg parasite of the satin moth, Leucoma salicis,” Proceedings of the Section on Experimental and Applied Entomology of the Netherlands Entomological Society 2: 169–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. (1990), “Update: Yellowjacket biological control in New Zealand,” IPM Practitioner 12(3): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, J. D., J. G. Millar, and R. F. Luck (1993), “A caffeic acid ester mediates host selection by a parasitic wasp,” Natur-wissenschaften 80: 92–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, K. L. S., and I. W. Forno (1992), Biological control of weeds, a handbook for practitioners and students. Melbourne, Australia: Inkata Press, 74 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (1990), “Environmental impact of introduced biological control agents,” in M. Mackauer, L. E. Ehler and J. Roland (eds.), Critical issues in biological control (pp. 289–300). Andover, Hants, UK: Intercept.

  • Hasan, S., E. S. Delfosse, E. Aracil, and R. C. Lewis (1992), “Host-specificity of Uromyces heliotropii, a fungal agent for the biological control of common heliotrope (Heliotropium europaeum) in Australia,” Annals of Applied Biology 121: 697–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin, S. E. (1984), “Scrub encroachment and its effects on soil fertility on New borough Warren, Anglesy, Wales,” Biological Conservation 29: 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, F. G. (1985), “Impacts of alien land arthropods and mollusks on native plants and animals in Hawaii,” in C. P. Stone and J. M. Scott (eds.), Hawaii's terrestrial ecosystems: Preservation and management (pp. 149–179). Proceedings of a Symposium, held June 5- 6, 1984, Hawaii Volcanoes National Park.

  • Howarth, F. G. (1991), “Environmental impacts of classical biological control,” Annual Review of Entomology 36: 485–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker, C. B., and P. S. Messenger, eds. (1976), Theory and practice of biological control. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, M. H., ed. (1992), Biological control of weeds: A world catalogue of agents and their target weeds, 3rd edn. Walling-ford, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International.

  • Kinzie, R. A. III (1992), “Predation by the introduced carnivorous snail Euglandia rosea (Ferussac) on endemic aquatic lymnaeid snails in Hawaii,” Biological Conservation 60:149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koritsas, V. M., J. A. Lewis, and G. R. Fenwick (1991), “Glucosinolate responses of oilseed rape, mustard and kale to mechanical wounding and infestation by cabbage stem flea beetle (Psylliodes chrysocephala),” Annals of Applied Biology 118: 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legner, E. F. (1986), “Importation of exotic natural enemies,” in J.M. Franz (ed.), Biological plant and health protection: Biological control of plant pests and of vectors of human and animal diseases. International Symposium of the Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz, November 15- 17, 1984 at Mainz and Darmstadt. Fortschritte der Zoologie, 32 (pp. 19–30). Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leius, K. (1961), “Influence of various foods on fecundity and longevity of adults of Scambus buolianae (Htg.) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae),” Canadian Entomologist 93: 1079–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, J. A. (1993), “Environmental issues involved in biological control of rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) with exotic agents,” Environmental Entomology 22: 503–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, C. T., and D. R. Davis (1989), “Southern New England host and distributional records of lithocolletine Gracillariidae (Lepidoptera) with comparisons of host specificity in temperature regions,” Miscellaneous Publications of the Entomological Society of America 70.

  • McEvoy, P. B. (1996), “Host specificity and biological pest control,” BioScience 46: 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, B. N., ed. (1993), Biological pollution: The control and impact of invasive exotic species. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, I. (1988), “Invasive alien plants and nature conservation in South Africa,” African Wildlife 42: 333–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen, R. E., and G. J. Harvey (1990), “Distribution and control of rubber vine, Cryptostegia grandiflora,a major weed in northern Queensland,” Plant Protection Quarterly 5(4): 152–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J. A., E. R. Oatman, R. H. Phillips, and G. W. Wood (1978), “Establishment of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in southern California,” Entomophaga 23: 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. J. (1983), “Possibilities for the biological control of Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens) using natural enemies from Europe,” Biocontrol News and Information 4(2): 103–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. J. (1993), “Observations on the parasitoid complexes of budmoths (Lepidoptera: Tortricoidea) on larch in Europe,” Bulletin of Entomological Research 83: 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, E. J., and T. Trinder-Smith (1992), “Invasion and control of alien woody plants on the Cape Peninsula Mountains, South Africa- 30 years on,”Biological Conservation 60:135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., E. Murray, M. S. Johnson, and B. Clarke (1988), “The extinction of Partula on Moorea,” Pacific Science 42: 150–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafus, D. M. (1993), “Movement of introduced biological control agents onto nontarget butterflies, Hypolimnas spp. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae),” Environmental Entomology 22: 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalepa, T. F., and S. W. Schlosesser, eds. (1993), Zebra Mussels: Biology, impacts, and control. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, C., D. Smith, G. A. C. Beattie, and M. Miles (1995), “Importation, host specificity testing, rearing and release of three parasitoids of Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepi-doptera: Gracillariidae) in eastern Australia,” Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 34: 343–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nechols, J. R., W. C. Kauffman, and P. W. Schaefer (1992), “Significance of host specificity in classical biological control,” in W. C. Kauffman and J. E. Nechols (eds.), Selection criteria and ecological consequences of importing natural enemies (pp. 41–52). Lanham, MD: Proceedings of the Thomas Say Publications in Entomology, Entomological Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • New, T. R., R. M. Pyle, J. A. Thomas, C. D. Thomas, and P. C. Hammond (1995), “Butterfly conservation management,” Annual Review of Entomology 40: 57–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. G., ed. (1986), The preservation of species: The value of biological diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onstad, D. W., and M. L. McManus (1996), “Risks of host range expansion by parasites of insects,” BioScience 46: 430–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsak, L. (1993), “Killing butterflies to save butterflies: a tool for tropical forest conservation in Papua New Guinea,” News of the Lepidopterists' Society 3: 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholt, W. A., A. J. Ngi-Song, S. K. Kimani, J. Mbapila, P. Lammers, and E. Kioko (1994), “Ecological considerations of the introduction of Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for biological control of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in Africa,” Biocontrol News and Information 15: 19N–24N.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., C. Glenister, S. Fast, and D. Gallahan (1984), “Environmental risks of biological pest controls,” Oikos 42: 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. D., H. G. Fowler, S. Campiolo, and M. A. Pesquero (1995), “Host specificity of several Pseudacteon (Diptera: Phoridae) parasites of fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in South America,” Florida Entomologist 78: 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. S. (1975), Macrolepidoptera of Fiji and Rotuma: A taxonomic and biogeographic study. Faringdon, Oxon, UK: E. W. Classey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways, M. J. (1994), Insect conservation biology. London: Chapman and Hall, 358 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, D. P. A. (1993), “Artifacts of confinement in para-sitoid/ host interactions: Interpretation and assessment for biological control of arthropod pests,” in S. A. Corey, D. J. Dall and W. M. Milne (eds.), Pest control and sustainable agriculture (pp. 196–199). Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, D. P. A. (1997), “The ‘safety’ of biological control agents: assessing their impact on beneficial and other non-target hosts,” Memoirs National Museum of Victoria 56(2): 611–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, D. P. A., and D. Papacek (1993), “Specificity requirements of exotic agents for biological control of arthropod pests,”in S.A. Corey, D.J. Dall and W.M. Milne(eds.), Pest control and sustainable agriculture. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Press, 495 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, D. P. A., P. Bakker, and F. M. Dori (1993), “Cotesia erionotae (Wilkinson) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), for biological control of banana skipper, Ermine thrax (L.) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in Papua New Guinea,” Micronesia 4 (suppl.): 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, J. V., Jr. (1934), “Introduced parasites of the brown-tail and gypsy moths reared from native hosts,” Annals of the Entomological Society of America 27: 585–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, D., and P. Kareiva (1996), “Perils and pitfalls in the host specificity paradigm,” BioScience 46: 448–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherley, G. H., and L. M. Hayes (1993), “The conservation of a giant weta (Deinacrida n.sp. Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae) at Mahoenui, King Country: habitat use, and other aspects of its ecology,” New Zealand Entomologist 16: 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D., and P. Stiling (1996a), “How risky is biological control?,” Ecology 77: 1965–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D., and P. Stiling (1996b), “Risks of species introduced for biological control,” Biological Conservation 78: 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E. (1990), “The onslaught of alien species, and other challenges in the coming decades,” Conservation Biology 4: 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, M. R., and J. J. Obrycki (1996), “Host specificity of insect parasitoids and predators,” BioScience 46: 422–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufkens, M. W., J. A. Farrell, and A. J. Popay (1994), “Quarantine host range tests on two exotic parasitoids imported for aphid control,” Proceedings of the 47th New Zealand plant protection conference. Waitangi Hotel, Rotorua, New Zealand.

  • Thomas, J. A. (1989), “Ecological lessons from the re-introduction of Lepidoptera,” The Entomologist 122: 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. A., and P. M. Room (1986), “Taxonomy and control of Salvinia molesta,” Nature 320: 581–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R. (1913), “Specialization of habit in parasites of insects,” Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Sèances et Mèmoires de la Sociètè de Biologie 75: 559–560 (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tothill, J. D., T. H. C. Taylor, and R. W. Paine (1930), The coconut moth in Fiji.A history of its control by means of parasites. London: Imperial Bureaux of Entomology (now Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, International Institute of Entomology).

  • Van Driesche, R. G. (1994), “Biological control for the control of environmental pests,” Florida Entomologist 77: 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driesche, R. G., and T. S. Bellows, Jr. (1996), Biological control. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rensburg, P. J. J., J. D. Skinner, and R. J. van Aarde (1987), “Effects of feline panleucopaenia on the population characteristics of feral cats on Marion Island,” Journal of Applied Ecology 24: 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., C. M. D'Antonio, L. L. Loope, and R. West-brooks (1996), “Biological invasions as global environmental change,” American Scientist 84: 468–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, F.-H., and P. Harris (1996), “Host finding and recognition by Altica carduorum, a defoliator of Cirsium arvense,” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 80: 491–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapshere, A. J. (1974), “A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological control of weeds,” Annals of Applied Biology 77: 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellings, P. W., P. J. Hart, V. Kami, and D. C. Morneau (1994), “The introduction and establishment of Aphidius colemani Viereck (Hym.: Aphidiinae) in Tonga,” Journal of Applied Entomology 118: 419–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, J. B., and D. L. Wagner (1988), “Patterns in host ranges within the Neartic species of the parasitoid genus Pholetesor Mason (Hymenoptera: Braconidae),” Environmental Entomology 17: 608–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. F., ed. (1994), Exotic ants: Biology, impact and control of introduced species. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, M. (1996), Biological invasions. London: Chap-man and Hall, 244 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Driesche, R.G., Hoddle, M. Should arthropod parasitoids and predators be subject to host range testing when used as biological control agents?. Agriculture and Human Values 14, 211–226 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007404710817

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007404710817

Navigation