Skip to main content
Log in

Incentives of land users in projects of soil and water conservation, the weight of intangibles

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies of soil and water conservation in third world situations show that among the farmers' incentives the commercial view on rural management is important and that at the same time intangible considerations are playing an important role. Traditional belief, local customs as well as inner conviction are also significant in the farmer's life. An example of incentives of land husbandry in the first world is given by a case of the Swiss Alp-farming. Their great attachment to this type of farming as well as the national support for mountain farmers' income play a role. In activities aimed at improvement of rural development in a third world country, the viewpoint of the expert may easily dominate any kind of plan making because of his position in the projects. However, his cultural background may limit his understanding of the rural situation in countries foreign to him. This has frequently lead to misjudging the importance of other than commercial incentives. A critical self-appraisal of motives and attitude to life by the adviser would often be needed in order to take immaterial incentives into account in development projects and in the achievement of agricultural policy. From the experience obtained in the third world and from the case study of the european alp-farming, the weight of intangibles in the land users' incentives appears as one of the crucial factors in rural management. This weight will grow with the present increasing need for sustainable agricultural productivity as well as with the need to create a sustained use of the environment in many parts of the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Pitsanu Attaviroj, 1996: Land development villages and soil doctors; strategies towards better land husbandry in Thailand. In: Samran Sombatpanit, Zöbisch M.A., Sanders D. and Cook M. (eds), Soil Conservation Extension - from Concepts to Adoption. The Soil and Water Conservation Society of Thailand, Bangkok, pp. 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergsma E., 1996: The bridge between land user and adviser. Land Husbandry, the International Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1: 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergsma E., 1996a: Land husbandry, can it be a partnership between farmers, land developers and extension workers? In: Samran Sombatpanit, Zöbisch M. A., Sanders D. and Cook M. (eds), Soil Conservation Extension - from Concepts to Adoption. The Soil and Water Conservation Society of Thailand, Bangkok, pp. 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwers J.H.A.M., 1993: Rural people's response to fertility decline; the Adja case (Benin). Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Veenman, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bweya L.A.C. and Mulenga N.J., 1993: Sustainable soil and water management in Malawi. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry. Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, pp. 26–29.

  • Cheatle R.J., 1993: Introduction to the section of Participatory appraisal, planning, and development. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry. Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, pp. 85–87.

  • Chambers R., 1993: Sustainable small farm development - Frontiers in participation. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry. Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, pp. 96–101.

  • Chambers R., 1993a: Participatory rural appraisal. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry, Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, pp. 87–95.

  • Douglas M.G., 1993: Making Conservation Farmer-Friendly. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry, Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water, pp. 4–14.

  • Dudal R., 1981: An evaluation of conservation needs. In: Morgan R.P.C. (ed.), 1981, Soil Conservation; Problems and Prospects, Proceedings ‘Conservation 80’, International Conference on Erosion and Conservation, Silsoe, 1980. John Wiley, New York, pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gappa H., 1993: Conservation in Bariadi. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry, Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, pp. 159–162.

  • Gunatilake H.M. and Abeygunawardena P., 1993: An economic analysis of soil conservation in tobacco lands in the Hangkuranketha area of Sri Lanka. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 48(1): 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann T., 1976: Paritätslohn und Einkommen in der schweizerischen Landwirtschaft, Agrarische-Rundschau 7: 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson N.W., 1993: Preface. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry, Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, pp. 3–4.

  • Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), 1993: Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry, Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water Conservation.

  • Hurni H., Cook M.G. and Samran Sombatpanit, 1996: Soil Conservation extension - a world perspective. In: Samran Sombatpanit, Zöbisch M.A., Sanders D. and Cook M. (eds), Soil Conservation Extension - from Concepts to Adoption. The Soil andWater Conservation Society of Thailand, Bangkok, pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung C., 1996: Wirtschaftliche Lage für die Milchbauern verschlechtert; Die Milchpreise in der Schweiz. Deutsche-Milchwirtschaft 47(11): 509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungerius P.D., 1986: Perception and use of the physical environment in peasant societies, the 16th Wilkinson Memorial Lecture 1985, Reading Geographical Papers, no. 93, Department of Geography, University of Reading, England, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiwanuka R., 1993: Joint energy and environment projects (JEEP): wood energy conservation by participatory activities. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry. Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, pp. 172–174.

  • Kosterman R. 1999: Peptalk?, Elsevier 23/9/1999, p. 78.

  • Lovejoy S.B., Lee T.G. and Basley D.B., 1986: Integration of physical and social analysis: the potential for micro targeting. In: Lovejoy S.B. and Napier T.T. (eds), Conserving Soil: Insight from Socio-Economic Research. Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, Iowa, USA, pp. 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz E., Pagiola S. and Reiche C., 1994: The cost and benefits of soil conservation: the farmer's viewpoint. The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 9(2), The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, pp. 273–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed Y.A., 1993: Water harvesting in Darfur, Sudan. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry. Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, pp. 169–172.

  • Netting R.Mc., 1981: Balancing on an Alp; Ecological change and continuity in a Swiss mountain community. University of Arizona, Cambridge University Press, 278 pp.

  • Neuenschwander E., 1976: Massnahmen zugunsten der Bergbauern in der Schweiz. Agrarische-Rundschau 7: 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederberger J., 1995: Die Nidwaldner Alpwirtschaft-bedeutendes Element bauerlicher Wirtschaft und Kultur. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen 146(7), 547–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwackhofer, Blank K. and Schwendinger E., 1982: Internationale Almwirtschaftstagung in Schoppernau (Bregenzerwald). Monatsberichte über die Österreichische Landwirtschaft, 29(11), 636–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaxson T.F., 1997: Soil erosion and land husbandry. Land Husbandry, the International Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaxson T.F., Tiffen M., Wood A. and Turton C., 1997: Better land husbandry: Re-thinking approaches to land improvement and the conservation of water and soil. Natural Resources Perspectives, 19, June 1997.

  • Stocking M., 1988: Socioeconomics of soil conservation in developing countries. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, pp. 381–385.

  • Sutherland A.J., 1993: Integrating a socio-economic perspective into soil and water management in Zambia. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry. Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, pp. 64–68.

  • Tobisson E., 1993: Changing roles for rural sociologists. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry, Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, pp. 59–63.

  • Tukahirwa E.M. and Veit P., 1993: Community soil conservation in Kabale, Uganda. In: Hudson N. and Cheatle R.J. (eds), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry, Intermediate Technology Publications, in association with the World Association of Soil and Water, Conservation, pp. 162–165.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergsma, E. Incentives of land users in projects of soil and water conservation, the weight of intangibles. GeoJournal 50, 47–54 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007146008246

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007146008246

Navigation