Skip to main content
Log in

Exogenous expression of Msx1 renders myoblasts refractory to differentiation into myotubes and elicits enhanced biosynthesis of four unique mRNAs

  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Murine myoblast cell lines stably transfected with expression vectors containing homeobox Msx1 cDNA in sense (F31-c) or antisense (F3R1) orientation have contrasting phenotypes. F3R1 cells readily differentiate in medium containing low serum whereas F31-c cells fail to differentiate under these conditions. The mechanism by which exogenous overexpression of Msx1 leads to the altered phenotype of F31-c cells and the downstream targets of Msx1 are unknown. Using the method of differential display, we have identified four cDNAs that represent transcripts up-regulated in F31-c. Two of these cDNAs are homologous to ribosomal proteins S23 and S24 while the third has homology to sequences in the murine Tcp-1 gene. A fourth cDNA does not have appreciable homology to cDNA sequences deposited in the NIH GenBank. Since withdrawal from the cell cycle and enhanced expression of MyoD commonly precede differentiation of myoblasts into myotubes, we also examined regulation of the major cell cycle proteins as well as MyoD by Western blot analysis. We show that the levels of Cdks 2, 4 and 6, cyclins A and D, and the Cdk inhibitor p27 in both proliferating and serum-starved F31-c cells were similar to those in F3R1. Finally, although MyoD protein levels increased in both cell types after 72 h incubation in serum depleted medium, the levels of MyoD in serum-starved F31-c cells were 2-4 fold lower. We postulate that the reduced amount of MyoD is sufficient to permit reversible withdrawal of F31-c cells from the cell cycle, but is inadequate to permit myogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holland PW: Cloning and evolutionary analysis of msh-like homeobox genes from mouse, zebrafish and ascidian. Gene 98: 253–257, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davidson D: The function and evolution of Msx genes: Pointers and paradoxes. Trends Genet 11: 405–411, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shimeld SM, McKay IJ, Sharpe PT: The murine homeobox gene Msx-3 shows highly restricted expression in the developing neural tube. Mech Dev 55: 201–210, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang W, Chen X, Xu H, Lufkin T: Msx3: A novel murine homologue of the Drosophila msh homeobox gene restricted to the dorsal embryonic central nervous system. Mech Dev 58: 203–215, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  5. Catron KM, Wang H, Hu G, Shen MM, Abate-Shen C: Comparison of MSX-1 and MSX-2 suggests a molecular basis for functional redundancy [published erratum appears in Mech Dev 56: 223, May 1996]. Mech Dev 55: 185–199, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  6. Houzelstein D, Cohen A, B uckingham ME, Robert B: Insertional mutation of the mouse Msx1 homeobox gene by an nlacZ reporter gene. Mech Dev 65: 123–133, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maas R, Chen YP, Bei M, Woo I, Satokata I: The role of Msx genes in mammalian development. Ann NY Acad Sci 785: 171–181, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  8. Satokata I, Maas R: Msx1 deficient mice exhibit cleft palate and abnormalities of craniofacial and tooth development. Nat Genet 6: 348–356, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  9. Woloshin P, Song K, Degnin C, Killary AM, Goldhamer DJ, Sassoon D, Thayer MJ: MSX1 inhibits myoD expression in fibroblast x 10T1/ 2 cell hybrids. Cell 82: 611–620, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  10. Catron KM, Zhang H, Marshall SC, Inostroza JA, Wilson JM, Abate C: Transcriptional repression by Msx-1 does not require homeodomain DNA-binding sites. Mol Cell Biol 15: 861–871, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang H, Catron KM, Abate-Shen C: A role for the Msx-1 homeodomain in transcriptional regulation: Residues in the N-terminal arm mediate TATA binding protein interaction and transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 1764–1769, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shetty S, Takahashi T, Matsui H, Ayengar R, Raghow R: Transcriptional autorepression of Msx1 gene is mediated by interactions of Msx1 protein with a multi-protein transcriptional complex containing TATAbinding protein, Sp1 and cAMP-response-element-binding proteinbinding protein (CBP/p300). Biochem J 339: 751–758, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sherr CJ: Cancer cell cycles. Science 274: 1672–1677, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  14. Song K, Wang Y, Sassoon D: Expression of Hox-7.1 in myoblasts inhibits terminal differentiation and induces cell transformation. Nature 360: 477–481, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kirtikara K, Laulederkind SJ, Raghow R, Kanekura T, Ballou LR: An accessory role for ceramide in interleukin-1beta induced prostaglandin synthesis. Mol Cell Biochem 181: 41–48, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burnette WN: 'Western blotting': Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate — polyacrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radiographic detection with antibody and radioiodinated protein A. Anal Biochem 112: 195–203, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kitaoka Y, Olvera J, Wool I: The primary structure of rat ribosomal protein S23. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 202: 314–320, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xu L, He GP, Li A, Ro HS: Molecular characterization of the mouse ribosomal protein S24 multigene family: A uniquely expressed introncontaining gene with cell-specific expression of three alternatively spliced mRNAs. Nucl Acids Res 22: 646–655, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kar S, Carr BI: Differential display and cloning of messenger RNAs from the late phase of rat liver regeneration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 212: 21–26, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kubota H, Yokota SI, Yanagi H, Yura T: Structures and co-regulated expression of the genes encoding mouse cytosolic chaperonin CCT subunits. Eur J Biochem 262: 492–500, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hong R: The DiGeorge anomaly (CATCH 22, DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome). Semin Hematol 35: 282–290, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weinberg RA: The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control. Cell 81: 323–330, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pines J: Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases: Take your partners. Trends Biochem Sci 18: 195–197, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hengst L, Reed SI: Translational control of p27Kip1 accumulation during the cell cycle. Science 271: 1861–1864, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  25. Piette J: The transition from proliferation to differentiation in nerve cells: What can we learn from muscle? Exp Cell Res 234: 193–204, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  26. Crescenzi M, Fleming TP, Lassar AB, Weintraub H, Aaronson SA: MyoD induces growth arrest independent of differentiation in normal and transformed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 8442–8446, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chu C, Cogswe ll J, Kohtz DS: MyoD functions as a transcriptional repressor in proliferating myoblasts. J Biol Chem 272: 3145–3148, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  28. Halevy O, Novitch BG, Spicer DB, Skapek SX, Rhee J, Hannon GJ, Beach D, Lassar AB: Correlation of terminal cell cycle arrest of skeletal muscle with induction of p21 by MyoD. Science 267: 1018–1021, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang JM, Wei Q, Zhao X, Paterson BM: Coupling of the cell cycle and myogenesis through the cyclin D1 — dependent interaction of MyoD with cdk4. Embo J 18: 926–933, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tiainen M, Spitkovsky D, Jansen-Durr P, Sacchi A, Crescenzi M: Expression of E1A in terminally differentiated muscle cells reactivates the cell cycle and suppresses tissue-specific genes by separable mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol 16: 5302–5312, 1996

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson-Jaeger, S., Raghow, R. Exogenous expression of Msx1 renders myoblasts refractory to differentiation into myotubes and elicits enhanced biosynthesis of four unique mRNAs. Mol Cell Biochem 208, 63–69 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007069317131

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007069317131

Navigation