Abstract
We analyze the evolution of aggressive behavior in intersexual conflicts, with a special reference to mate guarding behavior in crustaceans. An analysis of a discrete-strategy game shows that an ESS with only one of the sexes being aggressive prevail if fighting costs or fitness values of winning are asymmetric. Non-aggressiveness of both sexes is stable if fighting behavior is very costly for females and if the cost is at least partly paid independent of the strategy of the opponent. Most interestingly, the solutions of both sexes being aggressive prevails only if both sexes have some probability of winning, and if fighting costs are small. Second, we solve for the expected levels of aggressiveness in a game with continuous strategies. The form of the fighting cost function largely determines the stability of the solution. When fighting cost increases linearly with aggressiveness, mutual aggressiveness fluctuates cyclically instead of stabilizing at an ESS. However, if there is an asymmetry in fitness payoffs, a solution with only the sex having most to lose being aggressive alone is possible. With quadratically increasing fighting costs an ES combination of mutual aggressiveness may exist. It is predicted that fights between the sexes should be hardest when payoffs are symmetric, and that an overt behavioral conflict will always take place as long as there is a fitness loss to each of the sexes if losing the conflict and both sexes have a chance to win. We discuss the models in the context of fights preceding precopulatory guarding, but the models offer a general frame for analyzing any intersexual conflict.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, P.A., Matsuda, H. and Harada, Y. (1993) Evolutionary unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traits. Evol. Ecol. 7, 465–487.
Alexander, R.D., Marshall, D.C. and Cooley, J.R. (1997) Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In: J.C. Choe and B.J. Crespi (eds) The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 4–31.
Arnold, S.J. and Duvall, D. (1994) Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143, 317–348.
Arnqvist, G. (1997) The evolution of water strider mating systems: causes and consequences of sexual conflicts. In: J.C. Choe and B.J. Crespi (eds) The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 146–163.
Brown, J.S. and Vincent, T.L. (1987) Coevolution as an evolutionary game. Evolution 41, 66–79.
Clutton-Brock, T.H. and Parker, G.A. (1992) Potential Reproductive Rates and the Operation of Sexual Selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 67, 437–456.
Clutton-Brock, T.H. and Parker, G.A. (1995) Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim. Behav. 49, 1345–1365.
Dieckman, U. and Law, R. (1996) The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34, 579–612.
Enquist, M. and Leimar, O. (1983) Evolution of fighting behavior: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. J. Theor. Biol. 102, 387–410.
Eggert, A.K. and Sakaluk, S.K. (1995) Female-coerced monogamy in burying beetles. Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 37, 147–153.
Grafen, A. and Sibly, R. (1978) A model of mate desertion. Anim. Behav. 26, 645–652.
Hack, M.A. (1997) The energetic costs of fighting in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus L. Behav. Ecol. 8, 28–36.
Haig, J. and Rose, M.R. (1980) Evolutionary game auctions. J. Theor. Biol. 85, 381–397.
Hammerstein, P. and Parker, G.A. (1987) Sexual selection: Games between the sexes. In: J.W. Bradbury and M.B. Andersson (eds) Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 119–142.
Hofbauer, J. and Sigmund, K. (1998) Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Härdling, R. (1999) Arms races, conflict costs and evolutionary dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 196, 163–167.
Johnstone, R.A. and Norris, K. (1993) Badges of status and the cost of aggression. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32, 127–134.
Jormalainen, V. (1998) Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans — from male competitive strategy to intersexual conflict. The Quarterly Review of Biology 73, 275–304.
Jormalainen, V. and Merilaita, S. (1993) Female resistance and precopulatory guarding in the isopod Idothea baltica (Pallas). Behaviour 125, 219–231.
Jormalainen, V., Tuomi, J. and Yamamura, N. (1994) Intersexual conflict over precopula duration in mate guarding Crustacea. Behav. Proc. 32, 265–283.
Lifjeld, J.T. and Slagsvold, T. (1991) Sexual conflict among polygynous pied flycatchers feeding young. Behav. Ecol. 2, 106–115.
Maynard Smith, J. (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Motro, U. (1994) Evolutionary and continuous stability in asymmetric games with continuous strategy sets: the parental investment conflict as an example. Am. Nat. 144, 229–241.
Otronen, M. (1994) Repeated copulation as a strategy to maximize fertilization in the fly, Dryomyza anilis (Dryomyzidae). Behav. Ecol. 5, 51–56.
Parker, G.A. (1974) Courtship persistence and female quarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48, 157–184.
Parker, G.A. (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: M.S. Blum and N.A. Blum (eds) Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects. Academic press, New York, pp. 123–166.
Parker, G.A. and Thompson, E.A. (1980) Dung fly struggles: a test of the war of attrition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7, 37–44.
Rice, W.R. and Holland, B. (1997) The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 41, 1–10.
Rowe, L. (1994) The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Anim. Behav. 48, 1049–1056.
Rowe, L., Arnqvist, G., Sih, A. and Krupa, J.J. (1994) Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 289–293.
Sandell, M. and Smith, H. (1996) Already mated females constrain male mating success in the European Starling. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 38, 743–747.
Selten, R. (1980) A note on evolutionarily stable strategies in asymmetrical animal conflicts. J. Theor. Biol. 84, 93–101.
Strong, D.R. (1973) Amphipod amplexus, the significance of ecotypic variation. Ecology 54, 1383–1388.
Styron, C.E. and Burbanck, W.D. (1967) Ecology of an aquatic isopod, Lirceus fontinalis Raf., emphasizing radiation effects. Am. Midl. Nat. 78, 389–415.
Trivers, R.L. (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: B. Campbell (ed.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Aldine Press, Chicago, pp. 136–179.
Watson, P.J., Arnqvist, G. and Stallmann, R.R. (1998) Sexual conflict and the energetic costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Am. Nat. 151, 46–58.
Westneat, D.F. and Sargent, R.C. (1996) Sex and parenting: The effects of sexual conflict and parentage on parental strategies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, A87-A91.
Yamamura, N. and Higashi, M. (1992) An evolutionary theory of conflict resolution between relatives: altruism, manipulation, compromise. Evolution 46, 1236–1239.
Yamamura, N. and Jormalainen, V. (1996) Compromised strategy resolves intersexual conflict over precopulatory guarding duration. Evol. Ecol. 10, 661–680.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Härdling, R., Jormalainen, V. & Tuomi, J. Fighting costs stabilize aggressive behavior in intersexual conflicts. Evolutionary Ecology 13, 245–265 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006667103497
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006667103497