Skip to main content
Log in

Tissue culture method affects ex vitro growth and development of loblolly pine

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) propagules initiated adventitiously from cotyledons and via axillary-fascicular micropropagation from epicotyls were compared to seedlings grown from the same open-pollinated seedlot. Greenhouse and early field results indicate that unlike tissue culture propagules of cotyledon-origin, propagules originating via axillary-fascicular micropropagation from epicotyls do not display early reduced growth relative to seedlings. Further, axillary-fascicular micropropagules derived from cotyledon-origin adventitious shoots displayed early reduced growth. Early reduced growth and other differences between tissue culture propagules and seedlings previously observed in field plantings appear to be inherent to the cotyledon system of propagation and do not necessarily occur when other tissue culture procedures are used for propagation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amerson, H. V., Frampton, L. J., Jr., McKeand, S. E., Mott, R. L. and Weir, R. J. 1985.Loblolly pine tissue culture: Laboratory, greenhouse and field studies. pp. 271-287. In: Henke, R. R. Hughes, K.W., Constantine, M. J. and Hollander, A. (Eds) Tissue Culture in Forestry and Agriculture. Plenum Press, New York, 340 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amerson, H. V., Frampton, L. J., Jr., Mott, R. L. and Spaine, P. C. 1988. Tissue culture of conifers using loblolly pine as a model. pp. 117-137. In: Hanover, J. W. and Keathley, D. E. (Eds) Genetic Manipulation of Woody Plants. Plenum Press, New York. 519 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. B., Frampton, L. J., Jr., McKeand, S. E. and Hodges, J. F. 1992. Tissue culture shoot and root system effects on field performance of loblolly pine. Can. J. For. Res. 22: 56-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becwar, M. R. and Pullman, G. S. 1995. Somatic embryogenesis in loblolly pine (Pinus taedaL.). pp. 287-301. In: Jain, S., Gupta, P. and Newton, R. (Eds) Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants, Vol. 3. Kluwer, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, L. J., Jr. and Isik, K. 1987. Comparison of field growth among loblolly pine seedlings and three plant types produced in vitro. TAPPI J. 70: 119-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, L. J., Jr. and Jett, J. B. 1989. Juvenile wood specific gravity of loblolly pine tissue culture plantlets and seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 1347-1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. S. 1984. Phase change in loblolly pine: shoot development as a function of age. Physiol. Plant. 61: 518-522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley, L. W., Becwar, B. R., Chesick, E. E., Coke, J. E., Godbey, A. P. and Rutter, M. R. 1995. Research and development of commercial tissue culture systems in loblolly pine.Tappi J. 78(5): 169-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jett, J. B., McKeand, S. E. and Weir, R. J. 1991. Stability of juvenile wood specific gravity of loblolly pine in diverse geographic areas. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 1080-1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B. and McKeand, S. E. 1989. Stability of loblolly pine families in the Southeastern U.S. Silvae Genetica 38: 96-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, D. W. 1963. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J.Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 11: 431-441.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeand, S. E. 1985. Expression of mature characteristics by tissue culture plantlets derived from embryos of loblolly pine. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110: 619-623.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeand, S. E. and Allen, H. L. 1984. Nutritional and root development factors affecting growth of tissue culture plantlets of loblolly pine. Physiol. Plant. 61: 523-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeand, S. E., Crook, R. P. and Allen, H. L. 1997. Genotypic stability effects on predicted family responses to silvicultural treatments in loblolly pine. So. J. Applied For. (in press).

  • McKeand, S. E. and Wisniewski, L. A. 1982. Root morphology of loblolly pine tissue culture plantlets. pp. 214-219. In: Thielges, B. A. (Eds) Proc. 7th North Am. Biol. Workshop, 467 p.

  • Mott, R. L. and Amerson, H. V. 1981. A tissue culture process for the clonal production of loblolly pine plantlets. North Carolina Ag. Res. Ser. Tech. Bull. #271. 14 p.

  • Richards, F. J. 1959. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J. Experimental Botany 10(29): 290-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. 1985. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Ver. 5 Ed. Cary, NC. 956 p.

  • Waller, R. A. and Duncan, D. B. 1969. A Bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparison problem. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 64: 1484-1499 and Corrigenda 67: 253-255.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frampton, L.J., Amerson, H.V. & Leach, G.N. Tissue culture method affects ex vitro growth and development of loblolly pine. New Forests 16, 125–138 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006552130901

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006552130901

Navigation