Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contrast enhanced body magnetic resonance angiography

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of gadolinium contrast for body MRA is reviewed. Considerations for timing of the bolus of contrast are discussed. The utility of this technique is illustrated through clinical examples. Contrast enhanced MRA is rapidly replacing conventional angiography for many applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Owen RS. MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America 1998; 6: 385-95.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pelc NJ, Sommer FG, Li KC, Brosnan TJ, Herfkens RJ, Enzmann DR. Quantitative magnetic resonance flow imaging. Magnetic Resonance Quarterly 1994; 10: 125-47.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1993; 3: 877-81.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994; 191: 155-64.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hany TF, McKinnon GC, Leung DA, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Optimization of contrast timing for breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. Jounal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1997; 7: 551-6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo TK, Londy FJ, Ward JS, Maki JH. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta. Radiology 1997; 203: 109-14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foo TK, Saranathan M, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, Radiology 1997; 203: 275-80.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 1996; 201: 705-10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maki JH, Prince MR, Lodny FJ, Chenevert TL. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1996; 6: 642-51.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, Rosen RJ, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 205: 163-9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lentschig MG, Reimer P, Rausch-Lentschig UL, Allkemper T, Oelerich M, Laub G. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the major vessels at 1.0 T: dose-response findings and angiographic correlation. Radiology 1998; 208: 353-7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kopka L, Vosshenrich R, Rodenwaldt J, Grabbe E. Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 1998; 170: 345-8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davis CP, Hany TF, Wildermuth S, Schmidt M, Debatin JF. Postprocessing techniques for gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiographics 1997; 17: 1061-77.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hany TF, Schmidt M, Davis CP, Gohde SC, Debatin JF. Diagnostic impact of four postprocessing techniques in evaluating constrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR American Jounal of Roentgenology 1998; 170: 907-12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, Falise B, Villard J, Amiel M. Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhnaced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 1995; 165: 431-7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y, Johnston DL, Breen JF, Huston J, 3rd, Jack CR, Julsrud PR, et al. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1996; 36: 551-6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leung DA, Pelkonen P, Hany TF, Zimmermann G, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Value of image subtraction in 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1998; 8: 598-602.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lebowitz JA, Rofsky NM, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Gadolinium-enhanced body MR venography with subtraction technique. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 1997; 169: 755-8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meaney JF, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, Stafford-Johnson D, Hamilton BH, Prince MR. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonace angiography [see comments]. New England Journal of Medicine 1997; 336: 1422-7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaufman JA, Geller SC, Petersen MJ, Cambria RP, Prince MR, Waltman AC. MR imaging (including MR angiography) of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison with conventional angiography. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 1994; 163: 203-10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, Chenevert TL, Williams DM, Marx MV, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995; 197: 785-92.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laissy JP, Soyer P, Tebboune D, Tiah D, Hvass U, Menu Y. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment with gadolinium-enhanced time-of-flight coronal MR angiography (MRA). European Journal of Radiology 1995; 20: 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Holland GA, Dougherty L, Carpenter JP, Golden MA, Glifeather M, Slossman F, et al. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries [published erratum appears in AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996 Aug; 167(2): 541]. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 1996; 166: 971-81.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bendib K, Berthezene Y, Croisille P, Villard J, Douek PC. Assessment of complicated arterial bypass grafts: value of contrast-enhanced subtraction magnetic resonance angiography. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997; 26: 1036-42.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wintersperger BJ, Engelmann MG, von Smekal A, Knez A, Penzkofer HV, Hofling B, et al. Patency of coronary bypass grafts: assessment with breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography-value of a non-electrocardiographically triggered technique. Radiology 1998; 208: 345-51.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grenier N, Trillaud H, Combe C, Degreze P, Jeandot R, Gosse P, et al. Diagnosis of renovascular hypertension: feasibility of captopril-sensitized dynamic MR imaging and comparison with captopril scintigraphy. AJR American Jounal of Roentgenology 1996; 166: 835-43.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Prince MR, Schoenberg SO, Ward JS, Londy FJ, Wakefield TW, Stanley JC. Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology 1997; 205: 128-36.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li KC. Magnetic resonance angiography of the visceral arteries: techniques and current applications. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 496-503.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shirkhoda A, Konez O, Shetty AN, Bis KG, Ellwood RA, Kirsch MJ. Mesenteric circulation: three-dimensional MR angiography with a gadolinium-enhanced multiecho gradient-echo technique. Radiology 1997; 202: 257-61.

    Google Scholar 

  30. De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, Mellone R, Angeli E, Venturini M, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 205: 689-95.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Johnson DB, Lerner CA, Prince MR, Kazanjian SN, Narasimham DL, Leichtman AB, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of renal transplants. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1997; 15: 13-20.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rieumont MJ, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, Yucel EK, Cambria RP, Fang LS, et al. Evaluation of renal artery stenosis with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR American Jouranl of Roentgenology 1997; 169: 39-44.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, Hene RJ, de Kort GA, de Lange EE, et al. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 207: 497-504.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Miyazaki T, Namimoto T, Sumi S, Urata J, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography of the portal vein: value of the magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo seqeunce. Radiology 1996; 201: 283-8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stafford-Johnson DB, Hamilton BH, Dong Q, Cho KJ, Turcotte JG, Fontana RJ, et al. Vascular complications of liver transplantation: evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 207: 153-60.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rofsky NM. MR angiography of the aortoiliac and femoropopliteal vessels. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America 1998; 6: 371-84.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Li W, David V, Kaplan R, Edelman RR. Three-dimensional low dose gadolinium-enhanced peripheral MR venography. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1998; 8: 630-3.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vosshenrich R, Kopka L, Castillo E, Böttcher U, Graessner J, Grabbe E. Electrocardiograph-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight versus optimized contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the peripheral arteries. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1998; 16: 887-892.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Hann MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography [see comments]. Radiology 1998; 206: 683-92.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wang Y, Lee HM, Avakian R, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, Trost D. Timing algorithm for bolus chase MR digital subtraction angiography. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1998; 39: 691-6.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Grist TM, Korosec F R, Peters DC, Witte S, Walovitch RC, Dolan RP, et al. Steady-state and dynamic MR angiography with MS-325: initial experience in humans. Radiology 1998; 207: 539-44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Fairview-University Medical Center, Minneapolis, USA

    Arthur E. Stillman

Authors
  1. Arthur E. Stillman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stillman, A.E. Contrast enhanced body magnetic resonance angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 15, 131–137 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006118430910

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006118430910

Search

Navigation