Skip to main content
Log in

Agroforestry for soil and water conservation in the western Himalayan Valley Region of India 2. Crop and tree production

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A ten-year-study (1983 to 1992) conducted on nine 15 × 90 m runoff plots at 4% slope compared production efficiency of Leucaena leucocephala and Eucalyptus hybrid based agroforestry as well as monocropping landuse systems in the warm, subhumid climate of the western Himalayan region of India. Treatments for the first sequence were: monocropping systems of leucaena, eucalyptus, Chrysopogon fulvus grass and maize – wheat rotation, and alley cropping systems of grass and crops at 4.5 and 10.5 m alley widths with paired contour tree rows of leucaena and eucalyptus. In the second sequence, alley width increased to 22.5 m in 1989, grass was replaced by turmeric Curcuma longa and paired contour rows of leucaena hedges were introduced in monocropping systems of grain crops and turmeric. Integration of leucaena and eucalyptus trees with crops caused severe reduction of crop yields ranging from 21 to 92% for wheat grain, 59 to 69% for maize grain, 60 to 67% for dry grass and about 50% for turmeric rhizome depending upon the age of trees and alley width. The grain yield of crops stabilized at about 50% reduction with 22.5 m alley width. Total crop biomass (grain + straw) also revealed a similar trend; however, its magnitude of reduction was less severe than for grain. Production of biomass was much lower near the tree rows than in mid alleys. Managing leucaena as contour hedgerows eliminated crop yield reduction in alleys. Performance of grass and turmeric in alleys was not found to be satisfactory. Biomass produced from trees adequately compensated the crop yield reduction. Land equivalent ratios of agroforestry landuses were comparable or even better than monocropping systems indicating suitability of these systems for the western Himalayan valley region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • David S (1995) What do farmers think? Farmer evaluations of hedgerow intercropping under semi-arid conditions. Agroforestry Systems 32: 15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal SS, Juneja ML, Singh K and Singh S (1994) A comparison of two agroforestry systems for water and nutrient conservation on degraded land. Soil Technology 7: 145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RK, Shukla D, Nambiar KTN and Ghosh SP (1982) Evaluation of turmeric varieties for Doon valley. Indian J Soil Cons 10: 101–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Jama BA, Nair PKR and Rao MR (1995) Productivity of hedgerow shrubs and maize under alley cropping and block planting systems in semiarid Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 31: 257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khybri ML, Gupta RK, Sewa Ram and Tomar HPS (1992) Crop yields of rice and wheat grown in rotation as intercrops with tree species in the outer hills of Western Himalayas. Agroforestry Systems 17: 193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal SP and Singh P (1989) Intercropping field crops between rows of Leucaena leucocephala under rainfed conditions in northern India. Agroforestry Systems 8: 165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong CK, Rao MR and Mathur M (1992) Trees and crops — competition for resources above and below the ground. Agroforestry Today, April–June 1992

  • Rao MR, Ong CK, Pathak P and Sharma MM (1991) Productivity of annual cropping and agroforestry systems on a shallow Alfisol in semiarid India. Agroforestry Systems 10: 51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Ong CK and Saharan N (1989) Above and below ground interactions in alley cropping in semiarid India. Agroforestry Systems 9: 259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RW (1979) Intercropping — its importance and research needs. Part I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Narain, P., Singh, R.K., Sindhwal, N.S. et al. Agroforestry for soil and water conservation in the western Himalayan Valley Region of India 2. Crop and tree production. Agroforestry Systems 39, 191–203 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005900229886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005900229886

Navigation