Abstract
A ten-year-study (1983 to 1992) conducted on nine 15 × 90 m runoff plots at 4% slope compared production efficiency of Leucaena leucocephala and Eucalyptus hybrid based agroforestry as well as monocropping landuse systems in the warm, subhumid climate of the western Himalayan region of India. Treatments for the first sequence were: monocropping systems of leucaena, eucalyptus, Chrysopogon fulvus grass and maize – wheat rotation, and alley cropping systems of grass and crops at 4.5 and 10.5 m alley widths with paired contour tree rows of leucaena and eucalyptus. In the second sequence, alley width increased to 22.5 m in 1989, grass was replaced by turmeric Curcuma longa and paired contour rows of leucaena hedges were introduced in monocropping systems of grain crops and turmeric. Integration of leucaena and eucalyptus trees with crops caused severe reduction of crop yields ranging from 21 to 92% for wheat grain, 59 to 69% for maize grain, 60 to 67% for dry grass and about 50% for turmeric rhizome depending upon the age of trees and alley width. The grain yield of crops stabilized at about 50% reduction with 22.5 m alley width. Total crop biomass (grain + straw) also revealed a similar trend; however, its magnitude of reduction was less severe than for grain. Production of biomass was much lower near the tree rows than in mid alleys. Managing leucaena as contour hedgerows eliminated crop yield reduction in alleys. Performance of grass and turmeric in alleys was not found to be satisfactory. Biomass produced from trees adequately compensated the crop yield reduction. Land equivalent ratios of agroforestry landuses were comparable or even better than monocropping systems indicating suitability of these systems for the western Himalayan valley region.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
David S (1995) What do farmers think? Farmer evaluations of hedgerow intercropping under semi-arid conditions. Agroforestry Systems 32: 15–28
Grewal SS, Juneja ML, Singh K and Singh S (1994) A comparison of two agroforestry systems for water and nutrient conservation on degraded land. Soil Technology 7: 145–153
Gupta RK, Shukla D, Nambiar KTN and Ghosh SP (1982) Evaluation of turmeric varieties for Doon valley. Indian J Soil Cons 10: 101–103
Jama BA, Nair PKR and Rao MR (1995) Productivity of hedgerow shrubs and maize under alley cropping and block planting systems in semiarid Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 31: 257–274
Khybri ML, Gupta RK, Sewa Ram and Tomar HPS (1992) Crop yields of rice and wheat grown in rotation as intercrops with tree species in the outer hills of Western Himalayas. Agroforestry Systems 17: 193–204
Mittal SP and Singh P (1989) Intercropping field crops between rows of Leucaena leucocephala under rainfed conditions in northern India. Agroforestry Systems 8: 165–172
Ong CK, Rao MR and Mathur M (1992) Trees and crops — competition for resources above and below the ground. Agroforestry Today, April–June 1992
Rao MR, Ong CK, Pathak P and Sharma MM (1991) Productivity of annual cropping and agroforestry systems on a shallow Alfisol in semiarid India. Agroforestry Systems 10: 51–63
Singh RP, Ong CK and Saharan N (1989) Above and below ground interactions in alley cropping in semiarid India. Agroforestry Systems 9: 259–274
Wiley RW (1979) Intercropping — its importance and research needs. Part I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32: 1–10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Narain, P., Singh, R.K., Sindhwal, N.S. et al. Agroforestry for soil and water conservation in the western Himalayan Valley Region of India 2. Crop and tree production. Agroforestry Systems 39, 191–203 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005900229886
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005900229886