Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Precipitation Sensors Used on the Wet-Only Collectors

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The variability in performance of three precipitation sensor types, mounted on three identical wet-only collectors, has been compared for eight months at a single site. The catch efficiencies, determined from the sample volumes, are relatively high for these three apparatuses, since they exceed 89% on average. The recorded data of openings and closings of collector lids reveal that the highest losses of collection efficiency, observed for rainfalls of low intensity and low amount, are largely imputable to design and running characteristics of each sensor. Ionic compositions between the samples of these three collectors are relatively close, although significant differences are especially found for H+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and K+, suggesting that these apparatuses are differently exposed to the dry deposition of soil particles. The RS 85 sensor seems to be the most suitable one of the three, since it ensures a high catch efficiency for all rain types and tends to limit the exposures of funnel to the dry deposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coddeville, P and Guillermo, R.: 1996, Les Retombées Atmosphériques en France-Réseau MERA 1994 (in French), Mines School of Douai, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derexel, M. P.: 1991, Etude des caracteristiques physico-chimiques des hydrométéores dans le massifvosgien (in French), Thesis, University of Strasbourg, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. C., Robertson, J. K., Schroder, L. and Lafemina, J.: 1988, Water, Air and Soil Pollut. 37, 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. C. and Obal, J.: 1989, Atmos. Environ. 23, 1117–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, M. and Wolfe, D. A.: 1973, Nonparametric Statistical Methods, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, R. P. and Peters, N. E.: 1989, Environ. Sci. Technol. 23, 1263–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilles, M. A., Gordon, J. D. and Schroder, L. J.: 1994, Atmos. Environ. 28, 1121–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaisance, H., Coddeville, P., Guillermo, R. and Roussel, I.: 1996, Sci. Total Environ. 180, 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, J. R., Heyes, C. J. and Irwin, J. G.: 1990, Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 52, 377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, P. and Jobst, S.: 1988, Environmental Meteorology, Meteorological Observatory of Hamburg, Germany, pp 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, P., Jobst, and Harder, C.: 1988, Report Intercomparison of precipitation sensors and wet-only collectors, Meteorological Observatory of Hamburg, Germany, pp 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plaisance, H., Sauvage, S., Coddeville, P. et al. A Comparison of Precipitation Sensors Used on the Wet-Only Collectors. Environ Monit Assess 51, 657–671 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005886409749

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005886409749

Navigation