Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of callus formation and regeneration on cultured immature maize embryos of the inbred lines A188 and A632

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Induction, maintenance, differentiation and embryogenic capacity of callus obtained from immature embryos by culture on induction medium, proliferation medium, maturation medium and regeneration medium, respectively, were compared for two inbred lines of maize, i.e. A188 and A632. The callus of inbred line A188 was embryogenic and maintained embryogenic capacity for at least 1 year. Immature embryos of inbred line A632 formed callus that was not embryogenic. It only produced roots. When sucrose was replaced by sorbitol to induce or improve embryogenesis, again only A188 formed embryogenic callus. Subculture of this callus, however, allowed 4 week intervals in stead of 2 week intervals without loss of embryogenic capacity.

When A188 was pollinated with A632 pollen, embryogenic callus was obtained from cultured immature "F1" embryos, showing that embryogenic capacity was inherited, maternally. The callus did not differ from the embryogenic callus generated on selfed A188 embryos. When A632 was pollinated with A188 pollen, embryogenic callus was obtained too, showing that embryogenic capacity was also inherited paternally, though the embryogenic capacity diminished quickly, and the stability of the callus was lower than in the reciprocal cross.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong CL & Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline. Planta 164: 207–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bronsema FBF, Redig P, Van Oostveen WJF, Van Onckelen HA, Van Lammeren AAM (1996) Uptake and biochemical analysis of 2,4-D in cultured zygotic embryos of Zea mays L. J. Plant Physiol. 149: 363–371

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chu CC, Wang CC, Sun CS, Hsu C, Yin KC, Chu CY&Bi FY(1975) Establishment of an efficient medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments of the nitrogen sources. Sci. Sin. 18: 659–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan DR, Williams ME, Zehr BE & Widholm JE (1985) The production of callus capable of plant regeneration from immature embryos of numerous Zeamays genotypes. Planta 165: 322–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emons AMC & Kieft H (1991) Histological comparison of single somatic embryos of maize suspension culture with somatic embryos attached to callus cells. Plant Cell Rep. 10: 485–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emons AMC, Samallo-Droppers A & Van der Toorn C (1993) The influence of sucrose, mannitol, L-proline, abscisic acid and gibberellic acid on the maturation of somatic embryos of Zea mays L. from suspension cultures. J. Plant Physiol. 142: 597–604

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emons AMC & Kieft H (1995) Somatic embryogenesis in maize (Zea mays L.). In: Bajaj YPS (ed.) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry: Somatic Embryogenesis and Synthetic Seed II,Vol 31 (pp 24–39). Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransz PF & Schel JHN (1987) An ultrastructural study on the early callus development from immature embryos of the maize strains A188 and A632. Acta Bot. Neerl. 36: 247–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransz PF & Schel JHN (1991a) Cytodifferentiation during the development of friable embryogenic callus ofmaize (Zea mays). Can. J. Bot. 69: 26–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransz PF & Schel JHN (1991b) An ultrastructural study on the early development of Zea mays somatic embryos. Can. J. Bot. 69: 858–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransz PF & Schel JHN (1994) Ultrastructural studies on callus development and somatic embryogenesis in Zea mays L. In: Bajaj YPS (ed.) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry: Maize, Vol. 25 (pp 50–65). Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Green CE & Phillips RL (1975) Plant regeneration from tissue culture of maize. Crop Sci. 15: 417–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green CE & Rhodes CA (1982) Plant regeneration in tissue culture of maize. In: Sheridan WF (ed.) Maize for Biological Research. (pp 367–372) Univ. Press, Univ. Dakota, Grand Forks

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges TK, Kamo KK, Becwar MR & Schroll S (1985) Regeneration of maize. In: Zaitlin M, Day P & Hollaender A (eds.) Biotechnology in Plant Science (pp 15–33). Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamo KK, Becwar MR & Hodges TK (1985) Regeneration of Zea mays L. from embryogenic callus. Bot. Gaz. 146: 327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamo KK, Chang KL, Lynn ME & Hodges TK (1987) Embryogenic callus formation from maize protoplasts. Planta 172: 245–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Vasil V & Vasil IK (1983) Improved efficiency of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in tissue cultures ofmaize (Zea mays L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 66: 285–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mórocz S, Dudits D & Nemeth J (1986) Two approaches to rendering Zea mays L. applicable to tissue culture manipulation. In: Somers DA, Gengenbach BG, Biesboer DD, Hackett WP, Green CE (eds.) IV Int Congr Plant Tissue Culture, Minneapolis (pp 190)

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prioli LM& S¨ondahl MR (1989) Plant regeneration and recovery of fertile plants from protoplasts of maize (Zea mays L.). BioTechnology 7: 589–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes CA, Lowe KS & Ruby KL (1988) Plant regeneration from protoplasts isolated from embryogenic maize cell cultures. BioTechnology 6: 56–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shillito RD, Carswell GK, Johnson CM, Dimaio JJ & Harms CT (1989) Regeneration of elite inbred maize. BioTechnology 7: 581–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedlund B & Locy RD (1993) Sorbitol as the primary carbon source for the growth of embryogenic callus of maize. Plant Physiol. 103: 1339–1346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomes DT (1985a) Cell culture, somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in maize, rice, sorghum and millets. In: Bright SWJ & Jones MGK (eds.) Cereal Tissue and Cell Culture, (pp 175–205). Martinus Nijhoff/Dr.W.Junk Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomes DT (1985b) Opportunities and limitations of the genotypic influences on the establishment and plant regeneration from callus and cell cultures of crop species. In: Zaitlin M, Day P & Hollaender A (eds.) Biotechnology in Plant Science (pp 3–14). Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lammeren AAM (1988) Observations on the structural development of immature maize embryos (Zea mays L.) during in vitro culture in the presence and absence of 2,4-D. Acta Bot. Neerl. 37: 49–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Lu C & Vasil IK (1985) Histology of somatic embryogenesis in cultured immature embryos of maize (Zea mays L.). Protoplasma 127: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bronsema, F., van Oostveen, W. & van Lammeren, A. Comparative analysis of callus formation and regeneration on cultured immature maize embryos of the inbred lines A188 and A632. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 50, 57–65 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005802828004

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005802828004

Navigation