Abstract
Pellegrino has argued that end-of-life decisions should be based upon the physician's assessment of the effectiveness of the treatment and the patient's assessment of its benefits and burdens. This would seem to imply that conditions for medical futility could be met either if there were a judgment of ineffectiveness, or if the patient were in a state in which he or she were incapable of a subjective judgment of the benefits and burdens of the treatment. I argue that a theory of futility according to Pellegrino would deny that latter but would permit some cases of the former. I call this the “circumspect” view. I show that Pellegrino would adopt the circumspect view because he would see the medical futility debate in the context of a system of medical ethics based firmly upon a philosophy of medicine. The circumspect view is challenged by those who would deny that one can distinguish objective from subjective medical judgments. I defend the circumspect view on the basis of a previously neglected aspect of the philosophy of medicine -- an examination of varieties of medical judgment. I then offer some practical applications of this theory in clinical practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Veatch RM, Spicer CM. Medically futile care: the role of the physician in setting limits. American Journal of Law and Medicine 1992; 18: 15–36.
Truog, RD, Brett AS, Frader J. The problem with futility. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1560–1564.
Tomlinson T, Brody H. Futility and the ethics of resuscitation. JAMA 1990; 264: 1276–1280.
Brody BA, Halevy A. Is futility a futile concept? J Med Philos 1995; 20: 123–144.
Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NS, Jonsen AR. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med 1990; 112: 949–954.
Waisel DB, Truog RD. The cardiopulmonary resuscitation-not-indicated order: futility revisited. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 304–308.
Pellegrino ED. Withholding and withdrawing treatments: ethics at the bedside. Clin Neurosurg 1989; 35: 164–184.
Pellegrino ED. Ethics. JAMA 1993; 270: 202–203.
Pellegrino ED. Doctors must not kill. In: Misbin RI, ed. The Good of the Patient, The Good of Society. Frederick, Maryland: University Publishing Group, 1992: 27–41.
Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC. For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Benefi cence in Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988: 79–80.
Pellegrino and Thomasma, For the Patient's Good: 46–50.
Mill JS. On Liberty. Spitz D, ed. New York: WW Norton, 1975.
Pellegrino ED. The relationship of autonomy and integrity in medical ethics. In: Allebeck P, Jansson B, eds. Ethics in Medicine. New York: Raven Press, 1990: 3–22.
Personal communication: Pellegrino considers this so rare that he claims never to have personally been involved in a case in which it could be justifiably invoked.
Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC. The anatomy of clinical judgments. In: Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC. A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981: 119–152.
Hume D. A Treatise of Human Nature, Bk. III. Baltimore: Penguin, 1969: 520–521.
Ibid.
Lonergan BJF. Insight: A Study of Human Understanding. San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1958: 33–69.
The fact that there is such a thing as Einsteinian relativity does not detract from the classical nature of such statements or equations. According to the theory of relativity, these statements and equations are invariant over inertial transformation. And since physicians do not treat patients at the speed of light (much to the chagrin of the managers of HMOs), physicians need not bother calculating the Lorentz transformations.
Lonergan: 67–68; 299–304.
Knauss WA, Wagner DP, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991; 100: 1619–1636.
This list is an expansion upon themes raised by Longeran: 173–206.
See the discussion by Murphy EA. The Logic of Medicine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976: 117–134.
Pellegrino and Thomasma, A Philosophical Basis: 192–220.
Pellegrino and Thomasma, For the Patient's Good: 73–91.
Hippocrates. The art. In: Jones WHS, trans. Hippocrates II, Loeb Classical Library 148. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1972: 193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sulmasy, D.P. FUTILITY AND THE VARIETIES OF MEDICAL JUDGMENT. Theor Med Bioeth 18, 63–78 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005749217702
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005749217702