Abstract
Medical futility has been used increasingly by physicians to refer to the inappropriate application of medical intervention that is unlikely to produce any significant benefit for the patient. However, the concept of medical futility is controversial not only in its definition but also in its application. Decisions regarding end-of-life care in general and medical futility in particular are shaped by the inevitability of human death, limitations of medical sciences, scarcity of health resources, and various sociocultural issues.
In everyday clinical practice, physicians are under pressure to make decision about futile treatment and in some cases, there are disagreements between healthcare providers and patients’ family about the course of treatment deemed futile. The issue has divided experts in the relevant fields into two groups. The proponents of medical futility defend the physician’s exclusive right to determine the futility of treatment and decide whether treatment should be withheld or withdrawn. On the other hand, opponents believe that a discourse of power lies at the heart of the futility debate.
By elaborating the concept and controversy over medical futility, this entry presents a global review of the current approaches to the futility debate. It also examines different futility policy options and explains how futility policy can help healthcare professionals as well as family members to decide how aggressively to treat patients and when it is morally permissible to withhold or withdraw futile treatments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
American Thoracic Society. (1991). Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Annals of Internal Medicine, 115(6), 478–485.
Bagheri, A. (Ed.). (2013). Medical futility: A cross-national study. London: Imperial College Press.
Bagheri, A. (2014). Medical futility: Is a policy needed? Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics, 5, e102. doi:10.4172/2155-9627.1000e102 (Editorial).
Bagheri, A., Asai, A., & Ida, R. (2006). Experts’ attitudes towards medical futility: An empirical survey from Japan. BMC Medical Ethics, 7, 8. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-7-8.
Bernheim JL, Vansweevelt T, Annemans L. (2013). Medical Futility and End of Life Issue in Belgium. In AlirezaBagheri.ed. Medical Futility: A Cross-National Study. Imperial College Press. London, pp. 59–84.
Brody, H. (1994). The physician’s role in determining futility. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 42, 875–878, also see Brody, H. (1992). The healer’s power (pp. 175–176). Yale University Press.
Callahan, D. (1991). Medical futility, medical necessity: The-problem-without-a name. Hastings Center Report, 21, 30–35.
Callahan D. (2013). Is the Futility Debate Futile. In Alireza Bagheri.ed. Medical Futility: A Cross-National Study. Imperial College Press. London.
Martin D. (2013). Medical Futility in Australia. In Alireza Bagheri. (ed). Medical Futility: A Cross-National Study. Imperial College Press. London pp.119–144
Pellegrino, E. (2005). Futility in medicine decisions: The word and the concept. HEC Forum, 17(4), 308–318.
Rubin, S. B. (1998). When doctors say no, the battleground of medical futility (pp. 88–91). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Schneiderman, L. J., & Jecker, N. S. (2011). Wrong medicine: Doctors, patients, and futile treatment (2nd ed.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Scneiderman, L. J., Jecker, N. S., & Jonsen, A. R. (1990). Medical futility: Its meaning and ethical implications. Annals of Internal Medicine, 112, 949–954.
Taylor, C. (1995). Medical futility and nursing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 27(4), 301–306.
Truog, R. D., & Mitchell, C. (2006). Futility: From hospital policies to state laws. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(5), 19–21. doi:10.1080/15265160600858989.
Van Delden, J. (1993). Deciding not to resuscitate in Dutch hospital. Journal of Medical Ethics, 19, 200–205.
Veatch, R. M. (2013). So-called futile care: The experience of the United States. In A. Bagheri (Ed.), Medical futility: A cross-national study. London: Imperial College Press.
Wojtasiewicz, M. E. (2006). Damage compounded: Disparities, distrust, and disparate impact in endof-life conflict resolution policies. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(5), 8–12. doi:10.1080/15265160600856801.
Further Readings
Bagheri, A. (Ed.). (2013). Medical futility: A cross-national study. London: Imperial College Press.
Rubin, S. B. (1999). When doctors say no: The battleground of medical futility. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Schneiderman, L. J., & Jecker, N. S. (2011). Wrong medicine: Doctors, patients, and futile treatment (2nd ed.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Zucker, M. B., & Zucker, H. D. (Eds.). (1997). Medical futility: And the evaluation of life-sustaining interventions. Ney York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bagheri, A. (2015). Futility. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_204-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_204-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities