Abstract
Occupational aspirations of school children are undergoing changes as more men and women enter nontraditional spheres of work. Nevertheless, Papageorgiou (1982) reported that the overwhelming majority of a sample of upper elementary through high school students in Colorado regarded traditional gender roles as their only choice, and gender role stereotyping as placing serious limitations on career choices, particularly for females. In this article, we describe a replication of Papageorgiou's study in a western Canadian school district, with similar results. Gender-role stereotyping still appears to dominate the occupational aspirations of the majority of school children. Implications are drawn for counsellors interested in promoting career aspirations based on abilities and interests rather than gender-role stereotypes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association of University Women (1991). Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging America. Washington: AAUW.
American Association of University Women (1995). Growing Smart: What's Working for Girls in School. Washington: AAUW Educational Foundation.
Arnold, K. (1993). Academically talented women in the 1980s: The Illinois Valedictorian Project. In K. Hulbert & D. Schuster (eds.), Women's Lives Through Time: Educated American Women of the Twentieth Century (pp. 393-414). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bornholt, L., Goodnow, J. & Cooney, G. (1994). Influences of gender stereotypes on adolescents' perceptions of their own achievement. American Educational Research Journal 31(3): 675-692.
Callahan, C. M. (1991). An update on gifted females. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 14(3): 284-311.
Cullingford, C. (1993). Children's views on gender issues in School. British Educational Research Journal 19(5): 555-563.
Eccles, J. S. & Harold, R. D. (1992). Gender differences in educational and occupational patterns among the gifted. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline & D. Ambroson (eds.), Talent Development (pp. 2-30). New York: Trillium.
Fennama, E. (1990). Teachers' beliefs and gender differences in mathematics. In E. Fennama & G. Leder (eds.), Mathematics and Gender (pp. 169-187). New York: Teachers' College Press.
Grossman, H. & Grossman S. (1994). Gender Issues in Education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hollinger, C. L. (1991). Career choices for gifted adolescents: Overcoming stereotypes. In M. Bireley & J. Genshaft (eds.), Understanding the Gifted Adolescent (pp. 201-214). New York: Teachers' College Press.
Hopwood, T. & Carrington, B. (1994). Physical education and femininity. Educational Research 36(3): 237-246.
Kelly, K. & Hall, A. (1994). Effects of academic achievement and gender on occupational aspirations and career interests. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline & D. Ambroson (eds.), Talent Development (pp. 447-453). Dayton OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
Kerr, B. (1994). Smart Girls Two. Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
Kerr, B. (1997). Developing talents in girls and young women. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (2nd ed., pp. 483-497). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kleinfeld, J. S. & Yerian, S. (eds.) (1995). Gender Tales: Tensions in the Schools. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Lokan, J. & Fleming M. (1994, April). Perceptions of barriers to career choice: Do they lead to compromise? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. (ERIC Document ED 374 251).)
Lupaschuk, D. & Yewchuk, C. (1996). Gender and student occupational aspirations. Education Exceptionality Canada 6(2): 33-49.
McCormick, M. E. & Wolf, J. S. (1993). Intervention programs for gifted girls. Roeper Review 16(2): 85-88.
Milgram, R. M. (1991). Career education for gifted and talented learners. In R. M. Milgram (ed.), Counselling Gifted and Talented Children (pp. 121-138). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Morgison, B. (1995). Occupational Sex-role Stereotyping in Sixth Grade Students. Master's Thesis, Fort Hays State University (ERIC Document ED 396 163).
Nilsen, A. (1987). Three decades of sexism in school science materials. School Library Journal September, 117-122.
Papageorgiou, A. B. (1982). “My Daddy might have loved me”: Student perceptions of differences between being male and being female. Denver: University of Colorado.
Rennie, L. J. & Parker, L. H. (1993). Curriculum reform and choice of science: Consequences for balanced and equitable participation and achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(9): 1017-1028.
Sadker, M. & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at Fairness: How Our Schools Cheat Girls. New York: Touchstone.
Stage, E., Kreinberg, N., Eccles, J. & Becker, J. (1985). Increasing the participation and achievement of girls and women in mathematics, science, and engineering. In S. S. Klein (ed.), Handbook for Achieving Sex equity Through Education (pp. 237-268). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Silverman, L. K. (1993). Career counselling. In L. Silverman (ed.), Counselling the Gifted and Talented (pp. 215-238). Denver, CO: Love.
Taber, K. S. (1992). Science-relatedness and gender-appropriateness of careers: Some pupil perceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education 10(1): 105-115.
Timms, J. (1988, April). Cultural bias in children's storybooks: Implications for education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Valle, R. S. & King, M. (Eds.) (1978). Existential-phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
White, H. (1986). Damsels in distress: Dependency themes in fiction for children and adolescents. Adolescence 21: 251-255.
Wisconsin University (1993). “My Worst Nightmare...”: Wisconsin Students' Perceptions of Being the Other Gender (ERIC Document ED 356 426).
Wright, J. (1996). The construction of complementarity in physical education. Gender and Education 8(1): 61-79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lupaschuk, D., Yewchuk, C. Student perceptions of gender roles: Implications for counsellors. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 20, 301–318 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005327123336
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005327123336