Skip to main content
Log in

The Latent Structure of Substance Use Among American Indian Adolescents: An Example Using Categorical Variables

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Researchers frequently have only categorical data to analyze and cannot, for theoretical or methodological reasons, assume that the observed variables are discrete representations of an underlying continuous variable. We present latent class analysis as an alternative method of measuring latent variables in these circumstances. Latent class analysis does not require the assumptions of factor analyses about the nature of manifest and latent variables, but does allow the use of more precise model selection than techniques such as cluster analysis. We modeled the lifetime substance use of American Indian youth. The latent class model of American Indian teenagers' substance use had four classes: Abstaining, Predominantly Alcohol, Predominantly Alcohol and Marijuana, and Plural Substance. We then demonstrated the usefulness of this latent variable by using it to differentiate levels of several variables in a manner consistent with Social Cognitive Theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. P., Weissberg, R. P., & Hawkins, J. (1989). The relationship between values and social competence in early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 25, 458–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. G., Wallace, J. M., O'Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Kurth, C., & Neighbors, H. W. (1991). Racial/ethnic differences in smoking, drinking, and illicit drug use among American high school seniors, 1976–1989. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 372–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvais, F. (1992). Comparison of drug use rates for reservation Indian, non-reservation Indian and Anglo youth. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 5, 12–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvais, F., Oetting, E. R., Wolf, W., & Edwards, R. W. (1989). American Indian youth and drugs, 1976–1987: A continuing problem. American Journal of Public Health, 79, 634–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiser, M. (1991). Flower of Two Soils: Final report. Submitted to the National Institute of Mental Health, 5-R01-MH36678.

  • Binion, A. J., Miller, C. D., Beauvais, F., & Oetting, E. R. (1988). Rationales for the use of alcohol, marijuana, and other drugs by eighth-grade Native American and Anglo youth. The International Journal of the Addictions, 23, 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkelund, G. E., Goodman, L. A., & Rose, D. (1996). The latent structure of job characteristics of men and women. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 80–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, C. J. (1986). Things are rarely black and white: Admitting gray into the Converse model of attitude stability. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 657–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. A., Goldman, M. S. Inn, A. & Anderson, L. R. (1980). Expectations of reinforcement from alcohol: Their domain and relation to drinking patterns. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 419–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, D. J., Sham, P. C., Wessely, S., & Murray, R. M. (1994). The subtyping of schizophrenia in men and women: A latent class analysis. Psychological Medicine, 24, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, B. A., Goldman, M. S., & Inn, A. (1982). Development of alcohol-related expectancies in adolescents: Separating pharmacological from social-learning influences. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 336–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., & Goodman, L. A. (1984). Latent structure analysis of a set of multidimensional contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 762–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., & Goodman, L. A. (1985). Simultaneous latent structure analysis in several groups. In N. B. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 132–193). San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., & Goodman, L. A. (1986). On scaling models applied to data from several groups. Psychometrika, 51, 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., & Sawyer, D. O. (1981). A comparison of alternative models for analyzing the scalability of response patterns. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 240–280). San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. E. (1970). Attitudes and non attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue. In E. R. Tufte (Ed.), The quantitative analysis of social problems (pp. 168–189). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, S. R. (1988). Categorical Data Analysis System (Version 3.00a). Iowa City, IA.

  • Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, J. L., & Lynskey, M. T. (1994). The comorbidities of adolescent problem behaviors: A latent class model. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 22, 339–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1973a). The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables when some variables are posterior to others: A modified path analysis approach. Biometrika, 60, 165–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1973b). Causal analysis of panel studies and other kinds of surveys. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1135–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1996). The empirical study of latent types, latent variables and latent structures: An introduction for the untutored and some surprising new results for the enlightened. Paper presented at the Social Science and Statistics Memorial Meeting, State College, PA.

  • Hagenaars, J. A. (1990). Categorical longitudinal data: Log-linear panel, trend, and cohort analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, L. M., Chassin, L., & Sher, K. J. (1987). Alcohol expectancies and the risk for alcoholism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 411–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncher, M. S., Holden, G. W., & Trimble, J. E. (1990). Substance abuse among Native-American youth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1990). Adolescent drug use: Findings of national and local surveys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 230–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 111–163). Washington, DC: American Sociology Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapkin, B. D., & Luke, D. A. (1993). Cluster analysis in community research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 247–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, F. L., Chassin, L., & Molina, B. S. G. (1994). Alcohol expectancies in early adolescents: Predicting drinking behavior from alcohol expectancies and parental alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 176–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigemasu, K., & Sugiyama, N. (1994). Latent class analysis of choice behavior. Behaviormetrika, 21, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS, Inc. (1993). SPSS (Version 6.0). Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. C. (1983). The black and white model of attitude stability:Alatent class examination of opinion and nonopinion in the American public. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 130–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Pol, F., Langeheine, R., & de Jong, W. Panmark. (Version 3.0), Voorburg, Netherlands.

  • Vermunt, J. K. (1993). LEM. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K. (1996). Log-linear event history analysis. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, A. (1995). Why people take drugs. In J. A. Inciardi & K. McElrath (Eds.), The American drug scene (pp. 3–11). Los Angeles: Roxbury.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell, C.M., Plunkett, M. The Latent Structure of Substance Use Among American Indian Adolescents: An Example Using Categorical Variables. Am J Community Psychol 28, 105–125 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005146530634

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005146530634

Navigation