Skip to main content
Log in

Economics of Radiation Protection: Equity Considerations

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to implement cost-benefit analysis of protective actions to reduce radiological exposures, one needs to attribute a monetary value to the avoided exposure. Recently, the International Commission on Radiological Protection has stressed the need to take into consideration not only the collective exposure to ionising radiation but also its dispersion in the population. In this paper, by using some well known and some recent results in the economics of uncertainty, we discuss how to integrate these recommendations in the valuation of the benefit of protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Berthet, A., Boussard, P., Lochard, J., Brissaud, A., Rollin, P., and Lefaure, C.: 1992, ‘Valeurs de référence de l’unité de dose collective professionnelle pour la mise en oeuvre de la politique ALARA dans les centrales nucléaires d’Electricité de France’, Radioprotection, 27(4), 411-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt, L., Gollier, C., and Schneider, T.: 1995, ‘Risk aversion, prudence and temperance. A (more) unified approach’, Economics Letters, 48, 331-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Radiological Protection: 1973, ‘Implications of Commission Recommendations that Doses be kept as Low as Readily Achievable’, ICRP Publication 22, Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Radiological Protection: 1983, ‘Cost-benefit analysis in the Optimisation of Radiation Protection’, ICRP Publication37, Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Radiological Protection: 1985, ‘Quantitative Bases for developing a Unified Index of Harm’, ICRP Publication 45, Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Radiological Protection: 1991, ‘1990 Recommendations of the ICRP’, ICRP Publication 60, Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefaure, C., Lochard, J., Schneider, T., and Schieber, C.: 1993, ‘Proposition pour un système de valeurs monétaires de référence de l’homme-sievert’, Rapport CEPN R-193.

  • Rothschild, M., and Stiglitz, J.: 1970, ‘Increasing Risk: I. A Definition’, Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 225-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., and Stiglitz, J.: 1971, ‘Increasing Risk: II. Its Economic Consequences’, Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 66-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokell, P., Croft, J., Lochard, J., and Lombard, J.: 1991, ‘ALARA from theory towards practice’, CEC Report No. EUR 13796-EN.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, T., Schieber, C., Eeckhoudt, L. et al. Economics of Radiation Protection: Equity Considerations. Theory and Decision 43, 241–251 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004958909249

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004958909249

Navigation