Skip to main content
Log in

Television Viewing and High School Mathematics Achievement: A Neural Network Analysis

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between mathematics achievement and television viewing. The data consist of 13,542 high school seniors from the High School and Beyond project conducted by U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. A feed-forward neural network is employed as a nonlinear model. A curvilinear relationship is found, independent of viewer characteristics, parental background, parental involvement, and leisure activities, with a peak at about one hour of viewing, and persistent upon the inclusion of statistical errors. It is further shown that for low-ability students the curvilinearity is replaced with an entirely positive correlation across all hours of television viewing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D. R. & Lorch, E. P. (1983). Looking at television: Action or reaction. In: J. Bryant & D. R. Anderson (eds), Children's Understanding of Television: Research on Attention and Comprehension. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. R. & Smith, R. (1984). Young children's TV viewing: The problems with cognitive continuity. In: F. J. Morrison, C. Lord & D. F. Keating (eds), Advances in Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beentjes, J. W. M. & van der Voort, T. J.A. (1988). Television's impact on children's reading skills: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly 23: 389–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. M. (1996). Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B. & D. M. Titterington (1994). Neural networks: A review from a statistical perspective. Statistical Science 9: 2–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W. A. (1982). Cognitive processing in television viewing. In: D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet & J. Lazar (eds), Television and Behavior: Ten Years of Scientific Progress and Implications for the Eighties: Vol. 2. Technical Reviews. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, G. & Paik, H. (1991). Television and the American Child. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D., Bathurst, D. & Bathurst, R. (1990). The Telling Image: The Changing Balance Between Pictures and Words in a Technological Age. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N. R. & Smith, H. (1981). Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetler, M. (1984). Television viewing and school achievement. Journal of Communication 34: 104–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosarelli, P. (1986). In my opinion... Advocacy for children's appropriate viewing of television: What can we do? Children's Health Care 15: 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, D. G. (1991). A comparison of neural network and expert systems algorithms with common multivariate procedures for analysis of social science data. Social Science Computer Review 9: 399–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddy, G. D. (1986). Television's impact on high school achievement. Public Opinion Quarterly 50: 340–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, J. (1954). Effects of television upon elementary school grades. Journal of Educational Research 48: 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutfreund, H. & Toulouse, G. (eds) (1994). Biology and Computation. Advanced Series in Neuroscience: Vol. 3. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haertel, E. H. & Wiley, D. E. (1978). Social and Economic Differences in Elementary School Achievement. Chicago: ML-Group for Policy Studies in Education, CEMREL, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M. & White, H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks 2: 359–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. & Wright, J. C. (1989). The forms of television and the child viewer. In: G. Comstock (ed.), Public Communication and Behavior, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, pp. 103–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, T. Z., Reimers, T. M., Fehrmann, P. G., Pottebaum, S. M. & Aubey, L. W. (1986). Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 373–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe, A. E., Mead, N. A. & Askew, J. M. (1992). Learning Mathematics. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe, A. E., Mead, N. A. & Phillips, G. W. (1989). A World of Differences: International Assessment of Educational Progress. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzban, C. & Stumpf, G. J. (1996). A neural network for tornado prediction based on Doppler radar-derived attributes. Journal of Applied Meteorology 35: 617–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, T. (1993). Practical Neural Network Recipes in C++. Academic Press, Inc.

  • Meraviglia, C. (1996). Models of representation of social mobility and inequality systems. A neural network approach. Quality & Quantity 30: 231–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. & Gross, L. (1982). Television and educational achievement and aspiration. In: D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet & J. Lazar (eds), Television and Behavior: Ten Years of Scientific Progress and Implications for the Eighties: Vol. 2. Technical Reviews. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, pp. 78–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, B. & Reinhardt, J. (1990). Neural Networks; An Introduction. Physics of Neural Networks Series. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Mental Health (1982). Television and Behavior: Ten Years of Scientific Progress and Implications for the Eighties (DHHS Publication No. ADM 82-1195).Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Nelson, C. & Neff, K. J. (1990). Comparing and contrasting neural net solutions to classical statistical solutions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 326-577.)

  • Neuman, S. B. (1988). The displacement effect: Assessing the relation between television viewing and reading performance. Reading Research Quarterly 23: 414–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paik, H. & Marzban, C. (1995). Predicting television extreme viewers and nonviewers: A neural network analysis. Human Communication Research 22: 284–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, W. J. (1987). Does television viewing hinder academic achievement among adolescents? Human Communication Research 14: 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley-Johnson, R., Cooper, H. & Chance, J. (1983). The relation of children's television viewing to school achievement and I.Q. Journal of Educational Research 76: 294–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. D. (1996). Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1994). Interaction of Media, Cognition and Learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarle, W. S. (1994a). Neural networks and statistical models in SAS Institute Inc. Proc. Nineteenth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. (ftp://ftp.sas.com/pub/neural/neural1.ps.), pp. 1538–1550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarle, W. S. (1994b). Neural network implementation in SAS Software in SAS Institute Inc. Proc. Nineteenth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., pp. 1551–1573.

  • Sharman, K. (1979). Children's Television Behaviour: Its Antecedents and Relationships to School Performance. ACER Occasional Paper 14.

  • Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 36: 111–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (1992). National Education Longitudinal Study, 1988: First Follow-up (1990). [Student Data] [Computer file]. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement [producer], 1992. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium Political and Social Research [distributor], 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, G. & Wold, S. (1975). A completely automatic French curve: fitting spline functions by cross-validation. Communications in Statistics, Series A 4: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. A., Haertel, E. H., Haertel, G. D. & Walberg, J. (1982). The impact of leisure-time television on school learning: A research synthesis. American Educational Research Journal 19: 19–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woelfel, J. (1993). Artificial neural networks in policy research: A current assessment. Journal of Communication 43: 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. (1982). Television viewing and arousal. In: D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet & J. Lazar (eds), Television and Behavior: Ten Years of Scientific Inquiry and Implications for the Eighties: Vol. 2. Technical Reviews. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., Williams, B. R., Bryant, J., Boynton, K. R. & Wolf, M. A. (1980). Acquisition of information from educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 170–180.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paik, H. Television Viewing and High School Mathematics Achievement: A Neural Network Analysis. Quality & Quantity 34, 1–15 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004795407624

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004795407624

Navigation