Abstract
Since the 1930's, interdisciplinarity has been advocated in the social sciences for the purpose of achieving more comprehensive explanations of observable social phenomena. However, the realization of this promising perspective has been rather poor. This article argues that two main causes of the failure to create interdisciplinary social science can be distinguished, i.e., methodological and theoretical problems. Methodological problems stem either from taking a reductionist approach towards interdisciplinarity, or by mistaking measurement issues for theoretical topics. Theoretical problems result from the poor state and rate of theory formation within psychology. The implications of these problems are that the validity and reliability of explanations of macro social phenomena, which are provided by disciplines such as sociology and macro economics, are seriously at stake.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, Th. (1953). The operation called verstehen, in H. Feigl & M. Brodbeck (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Alessie, R. & Kapteyn, A. (1991). Habit formation, interdependent preferences and demographic effects in the almost ideal demand system, The Economic Journal 101: 404–419.
Alexander, J.C., Giesen, B., Münch, R., & Smelser, N.J. (eds.) (1987). The Micro-Macro Link, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bertalanffy, L. von (1973) (rev. ed.). General System Theory: Foundation, Development, Application, New York: George Braziller.
Boyd, R. (1980). Materialism without reductionism: what physicalism does not entail, in N. Block (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1. London: Methuen.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking. Systems Practice, New York: Wiley.
Churchman, Ch.W. (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization, New York: Basic Books.
Churchman, Ch.W. & Ackoff, R.L. (1968). Purposive behavior and cybernetics, in W. Buckley (ed.), Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, Chicago: Aldine.
Cook, Th.D. & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation, Chicago: Rand McNally.
Cortés, F., Przeworski, A., & Sprague, J. (1972). Systems Analysis for Social Scientists, New York: Wiley.
Einhorn, H.J. & Hogarth, R.M. (1988). Reply to commentaries, in D.E. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (eds.), Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Faber, J. & Koppelaar, H. (1994). Chaos theory and social science: a methodological analysis, Quality and Quantity 28: 421–433.
Fodor, J. (1974). Special sciences, or the disunity of science as a working hypothesis, Synthese 28: 77–115.
Harré, R. (1981). 'Philosophical aspects of the micro-macro problem, in K. Knorr-Cetina & A.V. Cicourel (eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Katz, D. & Kahn, R. (1968). Open-system theory, in W. Buckley (ed.), Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, Chicago: Aldine.
Miller, J.G. (1955). Towards a general theory for the behavioral sciences, American Psychologist 10: 513–531.
Naerssen, A.X. van (ed.) (1987). Interdisciplinary research on homosexuality in the Netherlands', Journal of Homosexuality 13,no. 2–3 (special issue).
Pareto, V. (1972) (eng. ed.). Manual of Political Economy, London: Macmillan.
Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System, New York: Free Press.
Popper, K. (1975) (3rd edn.). The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.
Ritzer, G. (ed.) (1990). Frontiers of Social Theory, New York: Columbia University Press.
Ropohl, G. (1979). Eine Systemtheorie der Technik: Zur Grundlegung der Allgemeine Technologie, München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Scheper, W.J. (1991). Group Decision Support Systems: An Inquiry into Theoretical and Philosophical Issues, Tilburg: Katholieke Universiteit Brabant (thesis).
Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1982). The expected utility model: its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations, Journal of Economic Literature 20: 529–563.
Simon, H.A. (1985). Human nature in politics: a dialogue of psychology with political science, American Political Science Review 79: 293–306.
Singer, E.A. (1946). Mechanism, vitalism, naturalism: a logico-historical study, Philosophy of Science 13: 81–99.
Stegmüller, W. (1983) (2nd ed.). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophie. Band I: Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung, Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Tinbergen, J. (1963). Shaping the World Economy — Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
Weber, M. (1985). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: Mohr.
Weintraub, E.R. (1979). Microfoundations: The Compatibility of Microeconomics and Macroeconomics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wippler, R. & Lindenberg, S. (1987). Collective phenomena and rational choice, in J.C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Münch, & N.J. Smelser (eds.), The Micro-Macro Link, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Faber, J., Scheper, W.J. Interdisciplinary social science: a methodological analysis. Quality & Quantity 31, 37–56 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004294723457
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004294723457