Abstract
Sociology is one of the most peculiar of the social sciences in the current intellectual marketplace, mixing together a unique set of features. Different from both Political Science and Anthropology is the centrality of theory and theorizing, especially when it comes to linking theory to fundamental or classical works, all-encompassing worldviews, perspectives, or foundational set of questions or problems (Abend 2008; Selg 2013). Most top journals’ contributions are judged by their conversation with theory or sets of theoretical concepts or principles. A significantly sized section of the American Sociological Association (ASA) and one of its most impactful journals (Sociological Theory) are devoted to sociological theory and theorizing. Nearly every department makes mandatory at least one theory course (Lamont 2004). Unlike Economics, and to a lesser extent, Psychology, theory in sociology is a big tent full of competing axiomatic, epistemological, and ontological perspectives. Unlike these behavioral sciences, sociology features wide methodological variety and competition between and within methodological traditions. This methodological diversity is deeply entwined with this theoretical heterodoxy (Bourdieu 1988).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
While putatively housed in political science departments, political theory is by all accounts an independent discipline.
- 2.
In addition to Sociological Theory, several other outlets regularly feature theoretical work in sociology. These include Theory & Society, Journal of Classical Sociology, European Journal of Social Theory and Theory, Culture, and Society.
- 3.
Although what we have to say is mostly confined to the problems and prospects of sociological theory in a single national field (The U.S.), it is important to observe that similar dynamics (albeit with significant differences of emphasis) can be observed in other settings (Guzman and Silver 2018; Outhwaite 2009; Rangel 2018)
- 4.
Not being shy to tell us what he really thought, Robert Merton (1968, pp. 2, n.2) once referred to the term as “the horrible hybrid that has ever since designated the science of society.”
- 5.
References
Abbott, A. 2017. Department and discipline: Chicago sociology at one hundred. University of Chicago Press.
Abend, G. 2008. The meaning of “theory.”. Sociological Theory 26 (2): 173–199.
———. 2019. Thick concepts and sociological research. Sociological Theory 37 (3): 209–233.
Abrutyn, S. 2013. Teaching sociological theory for a new century: Contending with the time crunch. The American Sociologist 44 (2): 132–154.
Alexander, J.C. 1987a. The centrality of the classics. Social Theory Today 1: 10–27.
———. 1987b. Twenty lectures: Sociological theory since world war II. Columbia University Press.
Ammerman, N.T. 2020. Rethinking religion: Toward a practice approach. American Journal of Sociology 126 (1): 6–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/709779.
Aron, R. 1965. Main currents in sociological thought. Basic Books.
Astor, A., and D. Mayrl. 2020. Culturalized religion: A synthetic review and agenda for research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 59 (2): 209–226.
Baehr, P. 2017. Founders, classics, canons: Modern disputes over the origins and appraisal of Sociology’s heritage. Routledge.
Blumer, H. 1986. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1988. Vive la crise! Theory and Society 17 (5): 773–787.
Chafetz, J.S. 1993. Sociological theory: A case of multiple personality disorder. The American Sociologist 24 (2): 59–62.
Cole, M. 1996. Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
Collins, R. 1975. Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science. Academic Pr.
Collins, R., and Others. 1994. Four sociological traditions. USA: Oxford University Press.
Connell, R. 2018. Decolonizing Sociology. Contemporary Sociology 47 (4): 399–407.
Connell, R.W. 1997. Why is classical theory classical? The American Journal of Sociology 102 (6): 1511–1557.
Coser, L.A. 1971. Masters of sociological thought: Ideas in historical and social context. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt P.
Durkheim, E. 1964. The division of labor in society. The Free Press.
———. 1995. The elementary forms of religious life. The Free Press.
Fromm, Erich. 1965. Escape from freedom. New York: Discus/Avon.
Giddens, A. 1976. Classical social theory and the origins of modern sociology. The American Journal of Sociology 81 (4): 703–729.
Guzman, C., and D. Silver. 2018. The institution of sociological theory in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology = Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 55 (1): 9–39.
Homans, G.C. 1950. The human group. Transaction Publishers.
Lamont, M. 2004. The theory section and theory satellites. Perspectives 27 (1): 1.
Lemert, C. 2016. Social theory: The multicultural, global, and classic readings. Avalon Publishing.
Levine, D.N. 1988. The flight from ambiguity: Essays in social and cultural theory. University of Chicago Press.
———. 1995. Visions of the sociological tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Lizardo, O. 2009. Taking cognitive dualism seriously: Revisiting the Durkheim-Spencer debate on the rise of individualism. Sociological Perspectives: SP: Official Publication of the Pacific Sociological Association. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1525/sop.2009.52.4.533
———. 2014. The end of theorists: The relevance, opportunities, and pitfalls of theorizing in sociology today. Pamphlet Based on the Lewis Coser Memorial Lecture. https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?cluster=2883302414661692197&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&sciodt=0,5
———. 2019. Simmel’s dialectic of form and content in recent work in cultural sociology. In The Germanic review: Literature, culture, theory. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00168890.2019.1585664.
Martin, J.L., and A. Lembo. 2020. On the other side of values. American Journal of Sociology 126 (1): 52–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/709778.
Mead, G.H. 1934. Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.
Merton, Robert K. 1967. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
Merton, R.K. 1968. Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster.
Mills, C.W., and Wright, of S. 1959. The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.
Morris, A. 2017. The scholar denied: W. E. B. Du bois and the birth of modern sociology. Univ of California Press.
Nisbet, R.A. 1993. The sociological tradition. Transaction Publishers.
Outhwaite, W. 2009. Canon formation in late 20th-century British sociology. Sociology 43 (6): 1029–1045.
Park, R.E., and E.W. Burgess. 1921. Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
Rangel, S. M. 2018. La teorizaciĂłn social en disputa: Una propuesta analĂtica sobre los fundamentos prácticos de la producciĂłn teĂłrica en las instituciones de sociologĂa en MĂ©xico (M. A. E. Saavedra (ed.)) [Maestro en Ciencia Social, El Colegio de Mexico]. https://ces.colmex.mx/pdfs/tesis/tesism_mateos_rangel.pdf
Reed, I.A. 2011. Interpretation and social knowledge: On the use of theory in the human sciences. University of Chicago Press.
Seidman, S. 1983. Liberalism and the origins of European social theory. University of California Press.
———. 1998. Contested knowledge: Social theory in the postmodern era. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Selg, P. 2013. The politics of theory and the constitution of meaning. Sociological Theory 31 (1): 1–23.
Stinchcombe, A.L. 1982. Should sociologists forget their mothers and fathers. The American Sociologist 17 (1): 2–11.
Tavory, I. 2018. Between situations: Anticipation, rhythms, and the theory of interaction. Sociological Theory 36 (2): 117–133.
Turner, S.P. 2012. De-intellectualizing American sociology: A history, of sorts. Journal of Sociology 48 (4): 346–363.
Weber, M. 1946. Religious rejections of the world and their direction. In From max Weber: Essays in sociology, ed. Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 323–358. Oxford University Press.
Zeitlin, I.M. 1968. Ideology and the development of sociological theory. Prentice-Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abrutyn, S., Lizardo, O. (2021). Introduction. In: Abrutyn, S., Lizardo, O. (eds) Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78204-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78205-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)