Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Sociology is one of the most peculiar of the social sciences in the current intellectual marketplace, mixing together a unique set of features. Different from both Political Science and Anthropology is the centrality of theory and theorizing, especially when it comes to linking theory to fundamental or classical works, all-encompassing worldviews, perspectives, or foundational set of questions or problems (Abend 2008; Selg 2013). Most top journals’ contributions are judged by their conversation with theory or sets of theoretical concepts or principles. A significantly sized section of the American Sociological Association (ASA) and one of its most impactful journals (Sociological Theory) are devoted to sociological theory and theorizing. Nearly every department makes mandatory at least one theory course (Lamont 2004). Unlike Economics, and to a lesser extent, Psychology, theory in sociology is a big tent full of competing axiomatic, epistemological, and ontological perspectives. Unlike these behavioral sciences, sociology features wide methodological variety and competition between and within methodological traditions. This methodological diversity is deeply entwined with this theoretical heterodoxy (Bourdieu 1988).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While putatively housed in political science departments, political theory is by all accounts an independent discipline.

  2. 2.

    In addition to Sociological Theory, several other outlets regularly feature theoretical work in sociology. These include Theory & Society, Journal of Classical Sociology, European Journal of Social Theory and Theory, Culture, and Society.

  3. 3.

    Although what we have to say is mostly confined to the problems and prospects of sociological theory in a single national field (The U.S.), it is important to observe that similar dynamics (albeit with significant differences of emphasis) can be observed in other settings (Guzman and Silver 2018; Outhwaite 2009; Rangel 2018)

  4. 4.

    Not being shy to tell us what he really thought, Robert Merton (1968, pp. 2, n.2) once referred to the term as “the horrible hybrid that has ever since designated the science of society.”

  5. 5.

    A focus on people is qualitatively different from a focus on traditions fruitfully exploited by Levine (1995) and Collins (1994), or even more appositely a focus on core notions or ideas pioneered by Nisbet (1993), like the latter we also find more productive a focus on core sociological ideas.

References

  • Abbott, A. 2017. Department and discipline: Chicago sociology at one hundred. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abend, G. 2008. The meaning of “theory.”. Sociological Theory 26 (2): 173–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Thick concepts and sociological research. Sociological Theory 37 (3): 209–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrutyn, S. 2013. Teaching sociological theory for a new century: Contending with the time crunch. The American Sociologist 44 (2): 132–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J.C. 1987a. The centrality of the classics. Social Theory Today 1: 10–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987b. Twenty lectures: Sociological theory since world war II. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ammerman, N.T. 2020. Rethinking religion: Toward a practice approach. American Journal of Sociology 126 (1): 6–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/709779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, R. 1965. Main currents in sociological thought. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astor, A., and D. Mayrl. 2020. Culturalized religion: A synthetic review and agenda for research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 59 (2): 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, P. 2017. Founders, classics, canons: Modern disputes over the origins and appraisal of Sociology’s heritage. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. 1986. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1988. Vive la crise! Theory and Society 17 (5): 773–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chafetz, J.S. 1993. Sociological theory: A case of multiple personality disorder. The American Sociologist 24 (2): 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. 1996. Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. 1975. Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science. Academic Pr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R., and Others. 1994. Four sociological traditions. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. 2018. Decolonizing Sociology. Contemporary Sociology 47 (4): 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W. 1997. Why is classical theory classical? The American Journal of Sociology 102 (6): 1511–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L.A. 1971. Masters of sociological thought: Ideas in historical and social context. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1964. The division of labor in society. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. The elementary forms of religious life. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, Erich. 1965. Escape from freedom. New York: Discus/Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1976. Classical social theory and the origins of modern sociology. The American Journal of Sociology 81 (4): 703–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzman, C., and D. Silver. 2018. The institution of sociological theory in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology = Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 55 (1): 9–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G.C. 1950. The human group. Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. 2004. The theory section and theory satellites. Perspectives 27 (1): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, C. 2016. Social theory: The multicultural, global, and classic readings. Avalon Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D.N. 1988. The flight from ambiguity: Essays in social and cultural theory. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Visions of the sociological tradition. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizardo, O. 2009. Taking cognitive dualism seriously: Revisiting the Durkheim-Spencer debate on the rise of individualism. Sociological Perspectives: SP: Official Publication of the Pacific Sociological Association. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1525/sop.2009.52.4.533

  • ———. 2014. The end of theorists: The relevance, opportunities, and pitfalls of theorizing in sociology today. Pamphlet Based on the Lewis Coser Memorial Lecture. https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?cluster=2883302414661692197&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&sciodt=0,5

  • ———. 2019. Simmel’s dialectic of form and content in recent work in cultural sociology. In The Germanic review: Literature, culture, theory. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00168890.2019.1585664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.L., and A. Lembo. 2020. On the other side of values. American Journal of Sociology 126 (1): 52–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/709778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. 1934. Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1967. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. 1968. Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W., and Wright, of S. 1959. The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. 2017. The scholar denied: W. E. B. Du bois and the birth of modern sociology. Univ of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R.A. 1993. The sociological tradition. Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outhwaite, W. 2009. Canon formation in late 20th-century British sociology. Sociology 43 (6): 1029–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R.E., and E.W. Burgess. 1921. Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangel, S. M. 2018. La teorizaciĂłn social en disputa: Una propuesta analĂ­tica sobre los fundamentos prácticos de la producciĂłn teĂłrica en las instituciones de sociologĂ­a en MĂ©xico (M. A. E. Saavedra (ed.)) [Maestro en Ciencia Social, El Colegio de Mexico]. https://ces.colmex.mx/pdfs/tesis/tesism_mateos_rangel.pdf

  • Reed, I.A. 2011. Interpretation and social knowledge: On the use of theory in the human sciences. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. 1983. Liberalism and the origins of European social theory. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Contested knowledge: Social theory in the postmodern era. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selg, P. 2013. The politics of theory and the constitution of meaning. Sociological Theory 31 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A.L. 1982. Should sociologists forget their mothers and fathers. The American Sociologist 17 (1): 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavory, I. 2018. Between situations: Anticipation, rhythms, and the theory of interaction. Sociological Theory 36 (2): 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S.P. 2012. De-intellectualizing American sociology: A history, of sorts. Journal of Sociology 48 (4): 346–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1946. Religious rejections of the world and their direction. In From max Weber: Essays in sociology, ed. Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 323–358. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, I.M. 1968. Ideology and the development of sociological theory. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seth Abrutyn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abrutyn, S., Lizardo, O. (2021). Introduction. In: Abrutyn, S., Lizardo, O. (eds) Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78204-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78205-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics