Abstract
In oficio de tinieblas 5, the Nobel Prize winner takes complete liberty of expression, creating a "ritual of darkness" or "black mass" which represents essentially the total rejection of all generally accepted beliefs, facts, and traditions.
The study shows how the author not only demolishes and ridicules academic and literary practices, but also distorts and recreates the knowledge found in history books, encyclopedias, ancient and modern literature, and the Bible. Like a nihilist, Cela seeks to do away with the status quo and thereby remodel, restore, and improve. But the author, unlike most nihilists, is not attempting to change politics or society, but rather literature, which he felt had become stagnant and irrelevant. Cela's unconventional narrative techniques are brought to the fore and particular attention is paid to the ubiquitous use of perverted sexuality and obscenities. the study also explains how the reader is taken through a maze of difficulties, contradictions, illogic and confusion. Comments are offered as to why the reader is left with a rather original reading experience which is strange, humorous and entertaining as well as frustrating, depressing, shocking and offensive. The value of the work as literature is also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Works Cited
Cain, Joan. BA 49: 1 (Winter, 1975), 92. Review of oficio de tinieblas 5.
Castro, Américo. Hacia Crevantes. 3rd ed. Madrid: Taurus, 1967, 486–490.
Cela, Camilo José. oficio de tinieblas 5. Barcelona: Plaza & Janes, 1989.
Cela, Camilo José. PSA (December, 1973): 204–205.
Cornwell, Diane Wilder. “Language as Expression of Consciousness in Cela's San Camilo, 1936.” Camilo José Cela: Homage to a Nobel Prize. Coral Gables, FL.: University of Miami, 1991, 63–69.
Foster, David William. “Camilo José Cela: 1989 Nobel Prize in Literature.” WLT 64:1 (1990): 5–8.
Ilie, Paul. “The Problematics of Obscenity in San Camilo, 1936.” Anales de la novela de posguerra 1 (1976): 25–63.
Knonik, John W. “El tremendo trasero de Doña Rosa: Cela y el realismo grotesco.” Camilo José Cela: Homage to Nobel Prize. Coral Gables, FL.: University of Miami, 1991, 117–122.
Oguiza, Tomás. “Antiliteratura en oficio de tinieblas 5.” Actas del sexto congreso internacional de Hispanistas celebrado en Toronto del 22 al 26 de agosto de 1977. Toronto: University of Toronto, 535–537.
Pérez, Janet. “Mazurca para dos muertos: Demythologization of the Civil War, History and Narrative Reliability.” ALEC 13 (1988): 88–104.
Polansky, Susan G. “Narrators and Fragmentation in Cela's Mrs. Caldwell habla con su hijo.” REH 21: 3(1987): 21–31.
Roberts, Gemma. “Culminación del tremendismo: oficio de tinieblas 5.” Anales de la novela de posguerra 1 (1976): 65–83.
Sobejano, Gonzalo. “Cela y la renovación de la novela.” Insula 45: 58–59, 66–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eller, K.G. Cela's Oficio de tinieblas 5: Nihilism, Demolition and Reconstruction of the Novel. Neophilologus 81, 223–229 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004230931102
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004230931102