Skip to main content
Log in

Fragmentarische Subversion Zu Christian Geisslers kamalatta

  • Published:
Neophilologus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Christian Geisslers novel kamalatta, published in 1988, deals with the politics of the fundamentalist left opposition from a sympathetic point of view. Geissler wrote the text during the breakdown process experienced by the socialist governments in the eastern hemisphere, which reached its symbolic peak with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. He reacts to the loss of the utopian perspective of revolutionary change. Kamalatta is characterized by a dual structure of political enthusiasm on one hand and the threat of failure on the other. The article verifies this thesis by examining three features of the book: firstly, the many-voiced constellation of the characters. Secondly, the genuine language that Geissler develops and in which he integrates esoteric and exoteric parts. Thirdly, the fragmented form of the novel. Geissler's highly artificial text has more to offer than left-wing agitation. In his chef d'oeuvre politics and aesthetics deconstruct each other and form a genuine textual movement that may be called the subversion of literature. This term includes two antithetical ideas: that literature should be overcome in order to act politically, and that literature itself offers a means to work subversively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturliste

  • Baudrillard, J. “Die Rückwendung der Geschichte,” in Sandbothe, M./ Zimmerli, W. Ch. (Hg.), Zeit – Medien – Wahrnehmung, Darmstadt, 1994. 1–13.

  • Benjamin, W. “Der Begriff der Kunstkritik in der deutschen Romantik,” in Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. I.1, Frankfurt/M., 1974. 7–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertaux, P. Friedrich Hölderlin, Frankfurt/M., 1978.

  • Freud, S. “Trauer und Melancholie,” in ders., Studienausgabe, Bd. III, Frankfurt/M., 1975. 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geissler, Chr. kamalatta. Berlin/West, 1988.

  • Gockel, H. “Friedrich Schlegels Theorie des Fragments,” in Ribbat, E. (Hg.), Romantik, Königstein/Ts., 1979. 58–79.

  • Hosfeld, R./ Peitsch, H. “Weil uns diese Aktionen innerlich verändern, sind sie politisch,” in Basis, Bd. 8, Frankfurt/M., 1978. 92–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jünschke, Kl. “begreifen, daß Krieg ist, und sich entscheiden,” in Der Spiegel, Nr. 12 vom 20.3.1989.

  • Krüger, H. Ñber den Aphorismus als philosophische Form, München, 1988.

  • Lukács, G. “Tendenz oder Parteilichkeit?,” in ders., Werke, Bd. 4, Neuwied und Berlin, 1971. 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennemeier, F. N. “Fragment und Ironie beim jungen Friedrich Schlegel,” Poetica, Jg. 2 (1968). 348–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möbius, H. Arbeiterliteratur in der BRD, Köln, 1970.

  • Munzinger-Archiv/Internationales Biographisches Archiv. Artikel “Christian Geissler”, Nlg. 42, 1990.

  • Neumann, G. Ideenparadiese, München, 1976.

  • Neumann, O. “Christian Geissler: Das Brot mit der Feile,” in Weimarer Beiträge, 12/1974, 1974. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostermann, E. Das Fragment, München, 1991.

  • Peters, U. H. Hölderlin. Wider die These vom edlen Simulanten, Reinbek b. H., 1982.

  • Reinhold, U. Literatur und Klassenkampf, Berlin/DDR, 1976.

  • Röhner, E. Arbeiter in der Gegenwartsliteratur, Berlin/DDR, 1976.

  • Rothschild, Th. “Motiv Gefangenschaft,” in Frankfurter Rundschau vom 3.10.1988.

  • Schneider, J. »Die Plage gegen den Stein«. Der Schriftsteller Christian Geissler zwischen Resignation und »zorniger Hoffnung«. Zur politisch-weltanschaulichen Standortfindung eines BRD-Autors in den Jahren 1960–1976, Diss. (masch.) Humboldt-Universität, Berlin/DDR, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, D. Fragmentpoetologie im 18. Jahrhundert und bei Friedrich von Hardenberg (Diss.) Kiel, 1976.

  • Schröder, H. J. Artikel “Christian Geissler,” in KLG, 34. Nlg, 1990.

  • Wackernagel, Chr. “Politik als Religion,” in Basler Zeitung vom 5.10.1988.

  • Waiblinger, W. “Friedrich Hölderlins Leben,” in ders., Werke und Briefe, Ausg. in fünf Bänden, hg. v. H. Königer, Bd. 3, Stuttgart, 1986. 379–407.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kramer, S. Fragmentarische Subversion Zu Christian Geisslers kamalatta. Neophilologus 81, 269–288 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004208413446

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004208413446

Keywords

Navigation