Abstract
Distinct parental cytoplasms were combined in symmetric tetraploid hybrids of potato by somatic cell fusion. This allowed, in the presence of nearly isogenic nuclear genomes, to estimate the contribution of mitochondrial (mt) and chloroplast (cp) genomes to starch content. Analysis of mt-cp configurations in the complete gene pool of german potato cultivars [2n=4x], in a reciprocal dihaploid population [2n=2x],in di-haploid fusion parents [2n=2x] and in their respective hybrids [2n=4x] made visible the effects of different cytoplasmic backgrounds and mitochondrial subgenomic rearrangements. Genotypes identified by markers as cytoplasm Wγ were associated with cytoplasmic male sterility. Evaluation of cytoplasmic types leads to the conclusion, that in starch content the ‘wild type’ cytoplasms Wα and Wγ have a significant advantage to other cytoplasmic types(Tβ, Wδ, Sε).This results from the experiments with a reciprocal population, 180 di-haploids, and from cultivar comparisons. In hybrids an interaction between starch content and different mt-cp combinations could be found. In general the highest field performance, measured in starch content and yield was associated with such cytoplasmic configurations which appeared to a high frequency within a population, when the segregation process was completed. This fact is explained by a selection advantage of clones with optimized organellar segregation already during in vitro phase. PCR markers for cytoplasm differentiation are actualized on a website, http://www.flg.tum.de/pbpz/mm/mt/hybrid.html
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amoah, V., P. Grun & J.R. Hill, 1988. Cytoplasmic substitution in Solanum. II. Tuber characteristics of reciprocal backcross progeny. Potato Research 31: 121-127.
Cardi, T., T. Bastia, L. Monti & E.D. Earle, 1999. Organelle DNA and male fertility variation in Solanum spp. and interspecific somatic hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 87: 900-908.
Donaldson, P.A., E. Bevis, R.S. Pandaya & S.C. Gleddie, 1994. Random chloroplast segregation and frequent mt DNA rearrangements in fertile somatic hybrids between Nicotiana tabacum L. and N. glutinosa L. Theor Appl Genet 87: 900-908.
Frei, U., M. Stattmann, A. Lössl & G. Wenzel, 1998. Aspects of fusion combining ability of dihaploid S. tuberosum L.: influence of the cytoplasm. Potato Research 41: 155-162.
Glimelius, K., K. Chen & T. Bonett, 1981. Somatic hybridization in Nicotiana: Segregation of organellar traits among hybrid and cybrid plants. Planta 153: 504-510.
Hilali, A., F.I. Lauer & R.E. Veilleux, 1987. Reciprocal differences between hybrids of Solanum tuberosum groups tuberosum (haploid) and Phureja. Euphytica 36: 631-639.
Horn, R. & W. Friedt, 1999. CMS sources in sunflower different origin but same mechanism. Theor Appl Genet 98: 195-201.
Horvath, G., N. Thanh, A. Rusu, L. Raschova & P. Medgyesy, 1992. Nucleus-mitochondrion incompatibility drives the DNA recombination mediated adaptation of the mitochondrial genome. HFSP-Workshop, Interaction of three genomes, S. 115, Berlin, 1992.
Hosaka, K. & R.E. Hannemann, 1988. The origin of the cultivated tetraploid potato based on chloroplast DNA. Theor Appl Genet 76: 172-176.
Kawagoe, Y. & Y. Kikuta, 1991. Chloroplast DNA evolution in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Theor Appl Genet 81: 13-20.
Köhler, R., R. Horn, A. Lössl & K. Zetsche, 1991. Cytoplasmic male sterility in sunflower is correlated with the co-transcription of a new open reading frame with the atpA gene. Mol Gen Genet 227: 369-376
Leaver, C.J., P.G. Isaac, I.D. Small, J. Bailey-Serres, A.D. Liddell & M.J. Hawkesford, 1988. Mitochondrial genome diversity and cytoplasmic male sterility in higher plants. Philosophical and Trans R Soc London 319: 165-176.
Lössl, A., U. Frei & G. Wenzel, 1994. Interaction between cytoplasmic composition and yield parameters in somatic hybrids of S. tuberosum L. Theor Appl Genet 89: 873-878.
Lössl, A., 1996, Analyse der DNA Variabilität in Zellorganellen somatischer Fusionshybriden der Kartoffel und deren phänotypische Auswirkungen, PhD Thesis, Technische Universität München, ISBN 3-931713-01-6.
Lössl, A., N. Adler, R. Horn, U. Frei & G Wenzel, 1999. Chondriome Type Characterization of Potato: Mtβ β, γ, δ, ∈, and Novel Plastid-Mitochondrial Configurations. Theor Appl Genet 99: 1-10.
Maris, B., 1989. Analysis of an incomplete diallel cross among three ssp. tuberosum varieties and seven long-day adapted ssp. andigena clones of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Euphytica 41: 163-182.
McVetty, P.B. & R. Pinnisch, 1994. Comparison of the effect of nap and pol cytoplasms on the performance of three summer oilseed rape cultivar-derived isoline pairs. Can J Plant Sci 74: 729-731.
Newton, K.J., Knudsen, C., Gabay-Laughnan, S. & J.R. Laughnan, 1990. An abnormal growth mutant in maize has a defective mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene. Plant Cell 2: 107-113.
Rasmussen, J.O., Lössl, A. & O.S. Rasmussen, 2000. Analysis of the plastome and chondriome origin in plants regenerated after 230 asymmetric Solanum ssp. protoplast fusions. Theor Appl Genet (in press).
Sanford, J.C. & R.E. Hannemann, 1982. Large yield differences between reciprocal families of Solanum tuberosum. Euphytica 31: 1-12.
Sanger, F., S. Nicklen & A.R. Coulson, 1977. DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors; Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74: 54-63.
Schilde-Rentschler, L., K. Kugler-Busch, A. Schweis & H. Ninnemann, 1995. Somatic hybrids for the study of nuclear cytoplasmic interaction in S. tuberosum. Advances in Plant Breeding 18: 37-48.
Spangenberg, G., E. Freydl, M. Osusky, J. Nagel & I. Potrykus, 1991. Organelle transfer by microfusion of defined protoplastcytoplast pairs; Theor Appl Genet 81: S. 477-486.
Stanley, R.G. & H.F. Linskens, 1974. Pollen-Biology, Biochemistry, Management, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg 1974.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lössl, A., Götz, M., Braun, A. et al. Molecular markers for cytoplasm in potato: male sterility and contribution of different plastid-mitochondrial configurations to starch production. Euphytica 116, 221–230 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004039320227
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004039320227