Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reducing Abstraction Level When Learning Abstract Algebra Concepts

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How do undergraduate students cope with abstract algebra concepts? How should we go about researching this question? Based on interviews with undergraduate students and on written questionnaires, a theoretical framework evolved which could coherently account for most of the data. According to this theoretical framework, students' responses can be interpreted as a result of reducing the level of abstraction. In this paper, the theme of reducing abstraction is examined, based on three interpretations for levels of abstraction discussed in mathematics education research literature. From these three perspectives on abstraction, ways in which students reduce abstraction level are analyzed and exemplified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D. and Thomas, K.: 1996, ‘A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education’, Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education II, The American Mathematics Society, pp. 1–32.

  • Asiala, M., Brown, A., Kleiman, J. and Mathews, D.: 1998, ‘The development of students' understanding of permutations and symmetries’, International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 3(1), 13–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asiala, M., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D. M., Morics, S. and Oktaç, A.: 1997, ‘Development of students' understanding of cosets, normality, and quotient groups’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior 16(3), 241–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beth, E. W. and Piaget, J.: 1966, Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., DeVries, D. J., Dubinsky, E. and Thomas, K.: 1997, ‘Learning binary operations, groups and subgroups’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior 16(3), 187–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchthal, D. C.: 1977, ‘Operative and nonoperative group definitions’, Mathematics Teacher 70(3), 262–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confrey, J.: 1990, ‘Chapter 8: What constructivism implies for teaching’, in R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher and N. Noddings (eds.), Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph Number 4, Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., pp. 107–122.

  • Davis, R. B., Maher, C. A. and Noddings, N.: 1990, ‘Chapter 12: Suggestions for the improvement of mathematics education’, in R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher and N. Noddings (eds.), Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph Number 4, Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., pp. 187–191.

  • Dreyfus, T.: 1990, ‘Advanced mathematical thinking’, in P. Nesher and J. Kilpatrick (eds.), Mathematics and Cognition: A research Synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematical Education, Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–134.

  • Dreyfus, T.: 1995, ‘Guest editorial, special issue — Advanced mathematical thinking’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 29, 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., Elterman, F. and Gong, C.: 1988, ‘The student's construction of quantification’, For the Learning of Mathematics 8(2), 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E.: 1991, ‘Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking’, in D. Tall (ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 95–123.

  • Dubinsky, E.: 1997, ‘On learning quantification’, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 16(2/3), 335–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., Dautermann, J., Leron, U. and Zazkis, R.: 1994, ‘On learning fundamental concepts of group theory’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 27, 267–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E. and Leron, U.: 1994, Learning Abstract Algebra with Isetl, Springer-Verlag.

  • Freedman, H.: 1983, ‘A way of teaching abstract algebra’, American Mathematical Monthly 90(9), 641–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frorer, P., Hazzan, O. and Manes, M.: 1997, ‘Revealing the faces of abstraction’, The International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 2(3), 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallian, J. A.: 1990, Contemporary Abstract Algebra, second edition, D. C. Heath and Company.

  • Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. L.: 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago, Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnik, V.: 1986, ‘Infinitesimals from Leibniz to Robinson, Time to bring them to school’, The Mathematical Intelligencer 8(2), 41–47, 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, E.: 1994, ‘A conceptual analysis of the proof-writing performance of expert and novice students in elementary group theory’, in J. Kaput and E. Dubinsky (eds.), Research Issues in Mathematics Learning: Preliminary Analyses and Results, MAA notes, No. 33.

  • Hazzan, O.: 1994, ‘A students' belief about the solutions of the equation x=x−1 in a group’, Proceedings of the 18th international conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lisbon, Portugal, Vol. III, pp. 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazzan, O.: 1995, Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Abstract Algebra Concepts. Ph.D. thesis, Technion — Israel Institute of Technology. Unpublished (Hebrew).

  • Hazzan, O. and Leron, U.: 1996, ‘Students' use and misuse of Mathematical Theorems: The Case of Lagrange's Theorem’, For the Learning of Mathematics 16, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herstein, I. N.: 1986, Abstract Algebra, Macmillan Publishing Company.

  • Kilpatrick, J.: 1987, ‘What constructivism might be in mathematics education’, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematical Education, Volume I, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, I.: 1991, ‘Rigor and proof in mathematics: A historical perspective’, Mathematics Magazine 64(5), 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leron, U.: 1987, ‘Abstraction barriers in mathematics and computer science’, Proceedings of the Third International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematical Education, Montreal.

  • Leron, U. and Dubinsky, E.: 1995, ‘An abstract algebra story’, The American Mathematical Monthly 102(3), 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leron, U., Hazzan, O. and Zazkis, R.: 1994, ‘Students constructions of group isomorphism’, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematical Education 3, 152–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leron, U., Hazzan, O. and Zazkis, R.: 1995, ‘Learning group isomorphism: A crossroads of many concepts’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 29, 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R. A.: 1976, ‘The influence of two types of advanced organizers on an instructional unit about finite groups’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 7(2), 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, D. R.: 1981, ‘A group whose elements are functions’, Mathematics Teacher 74(7), 521–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, I. D.: 1976, ‘Modern algebra in the nineteenth century’, Australian Mathematics Teacher 32(1), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesher, P. and Teubal, E.: 1975, ‘Verbal cues as an interfering factor in verbal problem solving’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 6, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesher, P.: 1980, ‘The stereotyped nature of school word problems’, For the Learning of Mathematics 1(1), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. and Hoyles, C.: 1996, Windows on Mathematical Meanings — Learning Cultures and Computers, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S.: 1980, Mindstorms — Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, Inc., Publishers / New York.

  • Pedersen, J. J.: 1972, ‘Sneaking up on a group’, Two Year College Mathematics Journal 3(1), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petricig, M.: 1988, ‘Combining individualized instruction with the traditional lecture method in a college algebra course’, Mathematics Teacher 81, 385–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1977, ‘Problems of Equilibration’, in M. H. Appel and L. S. Goldberg (eds.), Topics in Cognitive Development, Volume 1: Equilibration: Theory, Research and Application, Plenum Press, NY, pp. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G.: 1973, How to Solve it?, (Second edition), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadling, D.: 1978, ‘A contorted isomorphism’, Mathematics Teaching 85, 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E.: 1989, ‘Toward a microstructural account of human reasoning’, in S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, pp. 298–312.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H.: 1985, Mathematical Problem Solving, Academic press, Inc.

  • Selden, A. and Selden, J.: 1987, ‘Errors and misconceptions in college level theorem proving’, Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Vol. III, pp. 456–471.

  • Selden, A. and Selden, J.: 1993, ‘Collegiate mathematics education research: What would that be like?’ The College Mathematics Journal 24(5), 431–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A.: 1991, ‘On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin’, Educational Studies in mathematics 22, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A.: 1992, ‘Operational origins of mathematical objects and the quandary of reification — The case of function’, in E. Dubinsky and G. Harel (eds.), The Concept of Function — Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy, MAA Notes.

  • Simmonds, G.: 1982, ‘Computer discovery of a theorem of modern algebra’, Mathematics and Computer Education 16(1), 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, H.: 1987, ‘Constructivism and the psychology of mathematics’, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematical Education, Volume I, pp. 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., Roschelle, J.: 1993, ‘Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition’, The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3(2), 115–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, F. C. and Stern, E.: 1997, ‘Abstract reasoning with mathematical constructs’, International Journal of Educational Research 27(1), 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.: 1991 (ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. W.: 1985, ‘Experience, problem solving, and learning mathematics: Considerations in developing mathematics curricula’, in E. A. Silver (ed.), Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspective, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 189–236.

  • Thompson, P. W.: 1993, ‘Yes, Virginia, some children do grow up to be mathematicians’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 24(3), 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrash, K. R. and Walls, G. L.: 1991, ‘A classroom note on understanding the concept of group isomorphism’, Mathematics and Computer Education 25(1), 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U.: 1991, ‘Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematical education’, in I. Harel and S. Papert (eds.), Constructionism, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, pp. 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education in Technology and Science Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel

    Orit Hazzan

Authors
  1. Orit Hazzan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hazzan, O. Reducing Abstraction Level When Learning Abstract Algebra Concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics 40, 71–90 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003780613628

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003780613628

Keywords

Search

Navigation