Skip to main content
Log in

Phytoplankton communities in water bodies at Dungeness, U.K.: analysis of seasonal changes in response to environmental factors

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The major water bodies occurring on the Dungeness shinglecomprise the two Open Pits, which are natural in origin, and anumber of artificial gravel pits, varying from 20 to 90 yearsin age. These water bodies were found to exhibit significantvariations in salinity, from fresh water toα-oligohaline, probably for reasons of local geography.Investigation of the phytoplankton communities of these waterbodies, over a 12 month period from December 1990 to November1991, demonstrated clear seasonal fluctuations in thepopulations of many species. It also placed the water bodies inthree discrete groups which reflected mainly variations insalinity but which also suggested that the naturalness of theOpen Pits was an important factor in determining these groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bales, M., B. Moss, G. Phillips, K. Irvine & J. Stansfield, 1993. The changing ecosystem of a shallow, brackish lake, Hickling Broad, Norfolk. U.K. II. Long-term trends in water chemistry and ecology and their implications for restoration of the lake. Freshwat. Biol. 29: 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, H. & E. Swale, 1978. A beginners guide to fresh water algae. Institute of terrestrial ecology (NERC), HMSO, 47 pp.

  • Bellinger, E. G., 1980. A key to common British algae (fresh water). The Institutes of water engineers and scientists, London, 94 pp.

  • Castanier, S., M.-C. Bernet-Rollande, A. Maurin & J.-P. Perthuisot, 1993. Effects of microbial activity on the hydrochemistry and sedimentology of Lake Logipi, Kenya. Hydrobiologia 267: 99–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, C. E. & J. P. Smol, 1993. Diatom assemblages as indicators of lake trophic status in southeastern Ontario lakes. J. Phycol. 29: 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, J. W. Jr., C. A. S. Hall, W. M. Kemp & A. Y. Arancibia, 1989. Estuarine Ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York. 558 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, S. S., J. P. Smol, J. C. Kingston & D. F. Charles, 1992. Diatoms–powerful indicators of environmental change. Envir. Sci. Technol. 26: 22–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donaszy, E., 1959. Das Leben des Szelider Sees. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 425 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. H., 1972. A modified sedimentation system for counting algae with an inverted microscope. Hydrobiologia 40: 247–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fangstom, I. & E. Willen, 1987. Clustering and canonical correspondence analysis of phytoplankton and environmental variables in Swedish lakes. Vegetation 71: 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, B. W. & A. Henderson, 1984. The vegetation of natural fresh water pits at Dungeness. I. Higher plants. Trans. of the Kent Field Club 9: 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, B. W. & S. J. P. Waters, 1985. Six shingle beach areas at Dungeness. Internal report for the Nature Conservancy Council, Ashford, Kent, 75 pp.

  • Ferry, B.W. & S. J. P. Waters, 1986. Open Pit Survey. Internal report for the Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, 22 pp.

  • Ferry B. W. & S. J. P. Waters, 1988. Natural Wetlands on Shingle at Dungeness, Kent, England. Biol. Cons. 43: 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, F. E., 1965. Structure and Reproduction of the Algae. Volumes I & II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, F. E., 1964, 1972, 1978. Fritsch Collection of Algal Illustrations, Parts I–III. Freshwater Biological Association. Pertti Elorante Leiden, Inter Documentation Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, F. E. & P. Elorante, 1987. Fritsch Collection ofAlgal Illustrations, Part IV. Freshwater Biological Association. Pertti Elorante Leiden, Inter Documentation Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, G. M. & S. H. Hurlbert, 1993. Microcosm analysis of salinity effects on coastal lagoon plankton assemblages. Hydrobiologia 267: 307–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grindley, J. R., 1981. Estuarine plankton. In J. H. Day (ed.), Estuarine Ecology. A. A. Balkems: 117–146.

  • Hammer, U. T., 1986. The plankton communities of saline lakes. In U. T. Hammer (ed.), Saline Lake Ecosystems of the World. Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht: 171–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O., 1979. DECORANA–a FORTRAN programme for Detrended Correspondence Analysis & Reciprocal Averaging. Section of ecology and systematics. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, J. C. E., 1970. The shingle vegetation of southern England: a survey of Dungeness, Kent and Sussex. J. Ecol. 58: 713–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, K., B. Moss, M. Bales & D. Snook, 1993. The changing ecosystem of a shallow, brackish lake, Hickling Broad, Norfolk, U.K. I. Trophic relationships with special reference to the role of Neomysis integer. Freshwat. Biol. 29: 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinross, J. H., N. Christofi, P. A. Read & R. Harriman, 1993. Filamentous algal communities related to pH in streams in The Trossachs, Scotland. Freshwat. Biol. 30: 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund. J. W. G., C. Kipling & E. D. Le Cren, 1958. The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimation by counting. Hydrobiologia 11: 143–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, V. J., 1985. Geomorphological aspects of Dungeness. In B. Ferry & S. Waters, Focus on Nature Conservation No. 12. Dungeness Ecology and Conservation. Nature Conservancy Council: 2–12.

  • Reuter, J. E., L. Rhodes, M. E. Lebo, M. Kotzman & C. R. Goldman, 1993. The importance of nitrogen in Pyramid Lake (Nevada, USA), a saline, desert lake. Hydrobiologia 267: 179–189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D. B. H., 1986. Dungeness Foreland–its shingle ridges and what lies under them. Geogr. J. 152: 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Round, F. E., R. M. Crawford & D. G. Mann, 1990. The Diatoms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 747 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society for the Protection of Birds–internal reports, Dungeness, Kent.

  • Smayda, T. J., 1983. The Phytoplankton of Estuaries. In B. H. Ketchum (ed.), Ecosystems of the World 26. Estuaries and Enclosed Seas. Elsevier: 65–102.

  • The Symposium on the Classification of Brackish Waters, Venice 8–14th April, 1958. Arch. Oceanogr. Limnol. XI (Suppl).

  • Ter Braak C. J. F., 1988 CANOCO–a FORTRAN programme for canonical community ordination by partial detrended canonical correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (Version 2.1). Agricultural mathematics group, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, S. J. P. & B. W. Ferry, 1989. Shingle-based wetlands at Dungeness. Bot. J. linn Soc. 101: 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, B.R., Ferry, B.W. & Ford, T.W. Phytoplankton communities in water bodies at Dungeness, U.K.: analysis of seasonal changes in response to environmental factors. Hydrobiologia 362, 161–170 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003190702786

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003190702786

Navigation