Skip to main content
Log in

Unity and Diversity of Promotion Criteria in US Schools, Colleges and Departments of Education

  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the mission for faculty members in schools, colleges and departments of education (SCDEs) becomes ever wider, and subgroups of faculty develop to handle different aspects of SCDE missions, how to equitably reward faculty members becomes a crucial issue. Analyses of data collected from 918 tenure-line faculty members in 25 SCDEs suggest that faculty members feel current promotion criteria to be inflexible and Procrustean, and desire to have a set of more diversified promotion criteria consistent with their levels and patterns of involvement in SCDE missions. A typology of promotion criteria, and some policy implications of this study, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, C. B. 1989. Early Professors of Education: Three Case Studies. In: R. Wisniewski and E. R. Ducharme, eds., The Professors of Teaching: An Inquiry (29–51). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. 1989. The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, A. (Ed.). 1975. The Professors of Education: An Assessment of Conditions. Minneapolis: Society of Professors of Education, College of Education, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. 1991. The Improvement of Teaching. Teachers College Record 93(2): 236–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrowman, M. L. 1975. About Professors of Education. In: A. Bagley, ed., The Professors of Education: An Assessment of Conditions (55–60). Minneapolis: Society of Professors of Education, College of Education, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. 1987. College: The Undergraduate Experience in America. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 1987. A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 1989. The Condition of the Professoriate: Attitudes and Trends, 1989. Princeton, NJ: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartter, A. 1977. The Cartter Report on the Leading Schools of Education, Law, and Business. Change 9: 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, G. J. and Guthrie, J. W. 1988. Ed School. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culbertson, J. A. 1988. A Century's Quest for a Knowledge Base. In: N. J. Boyan, ed., Handbook of Research on Educational Administration (3–26). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducharme, E. R. 1987. Professors of Education: Beasts of Burden, Facilitators, or Academicians. Journal of Human Behavior and Learning 4: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S. 1993a. Academic Values and Faculty Rewards. The Review of Higher Education 17(1): 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S. 1993b. Faculty Reward Structures: Toward Institutional and Professional Homogenization. Research in Higher Education 24(5): 603–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. I. 1990a. Teachers for Our Nation's Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. I. 1990b. Studying the Education of Educators: From Conceptions to Findings. Phi Delta Kappan 71(9): 698–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, J. 1989. Education Professors: The Centennial of an Identity Crisis. In: R. Wisniewski and E. Ducharme, eds., The Professors of Teaching: An Inquiry (110–128). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. W. 1975. Divided We Stand: Observations on the Internal Organization of the Education Professoriate. In: A. Bagley, ed., The Professors of Education: An Assessment of Conditions (61–70). Minneapolis: Society of Professors of Education, College of Education, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasten, K. L. 1984. Tenure and Merit Pay as Rewards for Research, Teaching, and Service at a Research University. Journal of Higher Education 55: 500–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. A. 1973. Faculty Salaries, Promotion, and Productivity at a Large University. American Economic Review 63: 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. B. 1966. From Theory to Survey in Graduate Schools of Education. Journal of Higher Education 36: 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, H. A. 1990. Constraints on the Professional Service of Education Faculty. Journal of Teacher Education 41(4): 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, A. 1993. Changes in Incentives, Rewards and Sanctions. Higher Education Management 5(2): 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. and Dillion, K. E. 1980. Academic Productivity and Faculty Supplemental Income. Journal of Higher Education 51: 546–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, I. 1987. Educational Development Units: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Higher Education 16(4): 449–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A. 1980. The Uncertain Profession: Harvard and the Search for Educational Authority. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A. G. and Sizer, T. R. 1969. Changing Conceptions of the Professor of Education. In: J. S. Counelis, ed., To Be a Phoenix: The Education Professoriate (61–76). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, J. E. 1976. Teaching, Publication, and Rewards at a Liberal Arts College. Improving College and University Teaching 24(4): 238–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwebel, M. 1989. The New Priorities and the Education Faculty. In: R. Wisniewski and E. Ducharme, eds., The Professors of Teaching: An Inquiry (52–66). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J. 1995. Faculty Fragmentation and Teacher Education in Schools, Colleges, and Departments of Education. Journal of Teacher Education 46: 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirotnik, K. A. 1989. Studying the Education of Educators, Technical Report No. 2. Seattle: Center for Educational Renewal, College of Education, University Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. 1990. Killing the Spirit: Higher Education in America. New York, NY: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soder, R. and Sirotnik, K. A. 1990. Beyond Reinventing the Past: The Politics of Teacher Education. In: J. I. Goodlad, R. Soder and K. A. Sirotnik, eds., Places Where Teachers are Taught. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderberg, L. O. 1985. Dominance of Research and Publication: An Unrelenting Tyranny. College Teaching 33(4): 168–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. 1992. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Hillsdale, N. J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, H. P. and Hagemann, R. P. 1976. An Analysis of the Reward Structure in Two Disciplines. Journal of Higher Education 47(4): 447–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, H. P., Gapinski, J. H. and Hageman, R. P. 1977. Faculty Skills and the Salary Structure in Academe: A Market Perspective. American Economic Review 67(4): 692–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C., Reynolds, M. C. and Walberg, H. J. 1987 (Eds.). Handbook of Special Education: Research and Practice, Vol. 1. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski, R. and Ducharme, E. 1989 (Eds.). The Professors of Teaching: An Inquiry. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski, R. 1989. The Ideal Professor of Education. In: R. Wisniewski and E. Ducharme, eds., The Professors of Teaching: An Inquiry (134–146). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, J. Unity and Diversity of Promotion Criteria in US Schools, Colleges and Departments of Education. International Review of Education 44, 21–45 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003174922829

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003174922829

Keywords

Navigation