Abstract
This article focuses on the marketisation of education in Singapore since the mid-1980s. It describes and analyses two major manifestations of this phenomenon: the encouragement of greater school autonomy and the fostering of competition among schools. The article argues that the Singapore case does not involve a free market, but rather a regulated market. The promotion of such a quasi-market threatens to exacerbate not only the disparities between schools in terms of educational outcomes but also social inequalities. At the same time, it is not entirely clear whether the desired policy goals will be successfully attained. The discussion adds to the existing literature on the marketisation of education and its accompanying policy implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astin, A. W. 1992. Education “Choice”: Its Appeal May Be Illusory. Sociology of Education 65: 255–260.
Ball, S. J. ed. 1994. Education Reform: A Critical and Post-structural Approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Barnes, C. 1993. Practical Marketing for Schools. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Bowe, R. and Ball, S. J. with Gold, A. 1992. Reforming Education and Changing Schools: Case Studies in Policy Sociology. London: Routledge.
Bray, M. 1996. Privatisation of Secondary Education: Issues and Policy Implications. Paris: UNESCO.
Brown, D. J. 1990. Decentralization and School-based Management. London: The Falmer Press.
Bush, T. 1994. School Autonomy and School Improvement: UK and Singapore Perspectives. Keynote address at the eighth Annual Conference of the Educational Research Association, Singapore.
Chubb, J. E. and Moe, T. M. 1990. Politics, Markets, and America's Schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Deem, R., Brehony, K. and New, S. 1993. Education for All? Three Schools Go to Market. In: G. Wallace, ed., Local Management, Central Control: Schools in the Market Place (77–91). Bournemouth: Hyde Publications.
Fitz, J., Halpin, D. and Power, S. 1993. Grant Maintained Schools: Education in the Market Place. London: Kogan Page.
Fitz, J., Halpin, D. and Power, S. 1994. Grant Maintained Status: School Autonomy or State Control. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 374528).
Goh, C. T. 1992a. Quality Education. Speeches 16(4): 1–4.
Goh, C. T. 1992b. National Day Rally 1992. Singapore: Ministry of Information and the Arts.
Gopinathan, S. 1995. Singapore. In: P. Morris and A. Sweeting, eds., Education and Development in East Asia (79–103). New York: Garland Publishing.
Guthrie, J. W. 1991. The World's Evolving Political Economy and the Emerging Globalization of Education: A Set of Extrapolations, Interpolations, and Predictions Regarding the Likely Future Internationalization of Education Policy. Educational Research Journal 6: 1–15.
Le Grand, J., Propper, C. and Robinson, R. 1992. The Economics of Social Problems (3rd ed.). Houndmills: Macmillan.
Lee, H. L. 1994. The Government, the People and the Future. Speeches 18(4): 15–19.
Low, L. 1994. A Market System With Singapore Characteristics (MPP Working Paper Series No. 4). Singapore: Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore.
Macbeth, A., McCreath, D. and Aitchison, J. 1995. Competition, Collaboration and Possible Futures. In: A. Macbeth, D. McCreath and J. Aitchison, eds., Collaborate or Compete? Educational Partnership in a Market Economy (1–15). London: The Falmer Press.
Mathi, B. 1996, May 19. Top Schools Should Take in Bright Foreign Students, Says Yock Suan. The Sunday Times: 28.
Milne, R. S. and Mauzy, D. K. 1990. Singapore: The Legacy of Lee Kuan Yew. Boulder: Westview Press.
Ministry of Education, Singapore. 1987. Towards Excellence For All. Singapore: Author.
Ministry of Trade and Industry, Singapore. 1993. Report of the Cost Review Committee. Singapore: SNP Publishers.
Nirmala, M. and Mathi, B. 1995. May 24. Schools Making Literature Optional. The Straits Times: 3.
Parliamentary Debates Singapore: Official Report, 54, November 29, 1989; 59, January 6, 1992, January 16, 1992, March 13, 1992; 63, August 25, 1994; 64, March 1, 1995.
Physical Education: Walking in Thin Line Between Fit, Fat and Fun. 1996, April 11. The Straits Times: 40.
Plank, D. N. and Boyd, W. L. 1994. Politics and Governance of Education. In: T. Husén and T. N. Postlethwaite, eds., The International Encyclopedia Of Education Vol. 8(2nd ed.: 4587–4595). Oxford: Pergamon.
Rogers, M. 1992. Opting Out: Choice and The Future of Schools. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Secretaries of State for Education and Employment and for Wales. 1996. Selfgovernment for Schools (Cm 3315 Presented to Parliament). London: HMSO.
Tan, J. 1993. Independent Schools in Singapore: Implications for Social and Educational Inequalities. International Journal of Educational Development 13: 239–251.
Tan, J. 1996. Independent Schools and Autonomous Schools in Singapore: A Study of Two School Privatization Initiatives Aimed at Promoting School Innovation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Two Schools Willing to Consider Going Regional. 1996, May 10. The Straits Times Life! Supplement: 13.
Walford, G. 1990. Privatization and Privilege in Education. London: Routledge.
Wilson, H. E. 1978. Social Engineering in Singapore: Educational Policies and Social Change 1819–1972. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Yip, J. 1982, November. The Role of the Principal in a Decentralised System of Education Management. Paper Presented at Principals' Seminar on Principalship in a Decentralised System of Educational Management, Singapore.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, J. The Marketisation of Education in Singapore: Policies and Implications. International Review of Education 44, 47–63 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003127023737
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003127023737