Skip to main content
Log in

The Marketisation of Education in Singapore: Policies and Implications

  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article focuses on the marketisation of education in Singapore since the mid-1980s. It describes and analyses two major manifestations of this phenomenon: the encouragement of greater school autonomy and the fostering of competition among schools. The article argues that the Singapore case does not involve a free market, but rather a regulated market. The promotion of such a quasi-market threatens to exacerbate not only the disparities between schools in terms of educational outcomes but also social inequalities. At the same time, it is not entirely clear whether the desired policy goals will be successfully attained. The discussion adds to the existing literature on the marketisation of education and its accompanying policy implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, A. W. 1992. Education “Choice”: Its Appeal May Be Illusory. Sociology of Education 65: 255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. ed. 1994. Education Reform: A Critical and Post-structural Approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. 1993. Practical Marketing for Schools. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowe, R. and Ball, S. J. with Gold, A. 1992. Reforming Education and Changing Schools: Case Studies in Policy Sociology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. 1996. Privatisation of Secondary Education: Issues and Policy Implications. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. J. 1990. Decentralization and School-based Management. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, T. 1994. School Autonomy and School Improvement: UK and Singapore Perspectives. Keynote address at the eighth Annual Conference of the Educational Research Association, Singapore.

  • Chubb, J. E. and Moe, T. M. 1990. Politics, Markets, and America's Schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Brehony, K. and New, S. 1993. Education for All? Three Schools Go to Market. In: G. Wallace, ed., Local Management, Central Control: Schools in the Market Place (77–91). Bournemouth: Hyde Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz, J., Halpin, D. and Power, S. 1993. Grant Maintained Schools: Education in the Market Place. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz, J., Halpin, D. and Power, S. 1994. Grant Maintained Status: School Autonomy or State Control. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 374528).

  • Goh, C. T. 1992a. Quality Education. Speeches 16(4): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C. T. 1992b. National Day Rally 1992. Singapore: Ministry of Information and the Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan, S. 1995. Singapore. In: P. Morris and A. Sweeting, eds., Education and Development in East Asia (79–103). New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. W. 1991. The World's Evolving Political Economy and the Emerging Globalization of Education: A Set of Extrapolations, Interpolations, and Predictions Regarding the Likely Future Internationalization of Education Policy. Educational Research Journal 6: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J., Propper, C. and Robinson, R. 1992. The Economics of Social Problems (3rd ed.). Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L. 1994. The Government, the People and the Future. Speeches 18(4): 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, L. 1994. A Market System With Singapore Characteristics (MPP Working Paper Series No. 4). Singapore: Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macbeth, A., McCreath, D. and Aitchison, J. 1995. Competition, Collaboration and Possible Futures. In: A. Macbeth, D. McCreath and J. Aitchison, eds., Collaborate or Compete? Educational Partnership in a Market Economy (1–15). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathi, B. 1996, May 19. Top Schools Should Take in Bright Foreign Students, Says Yock Suan. The Sunday Times: 28.

  • Milne, R. S. and Mauzy, D. K. 1990. Singapore: The Legacy of Lee Kuan Yew. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. 1987. Towards Excellence For All. Singapore: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Trade and Industry, Singapore. 1993. Report of the Cost Review Committee. Singapore: SNP Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nirmala, M. and Mathi, B. 1995. May 24. Schools Making Literature Optional. The Straits Times: 3.

  • Parliamentary Debates Singapore: Official Report, 54, November 29, 1989; 59, January 6, 1992, January 16, 1992, March 13, 1992; 63, August 25, 1994; 64, March 1, 1995.

  • Physical Education: Walking in Thin Line Between Fit, Fat and Fun. 1996, April 11. The Straits Times: 40.

  • Plank, D. N. and Boyd, W. L. 1994. Politics and Governance of Education. In: T. Husén and T. N. Postlethwaite, eds., The International Encyclopedia Of Education Vol. 8(2nd ed.: 4587–4595). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. 1992. Opting Out: Choice and The Future of Schools. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretaries of State for Education and Employment and for Wales. 1996. Selfgovernment for Schools (Cm 3315 Presented to Parliament). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. 1993. Independent Schools in Singapore: Implications for Social and Educational Inequalities. International Journal of Educational Development 13: 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. 1996. Independent Schools and Autonomous Schools in Singapore: A Study of Two School Privatization Initiatives Aimed at Promoting School Innovation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.

  • Two Schools Willing to Consider Going Regional. 1996, May 10. The Straits Times Life! Supplement: 13.

  • Walford, G. 1990. Privatization and Privilege in Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, H. E. 1978. Social Engineering in Singapore: Educational Policies and Social Change 1819–1972. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, J. 1982, November. The Role of the Principal in a Decentralised System of Education Management. Paper Presented at Principals' Seminar on Principalship in a Decentralised System of Educational Management, Singapore.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, J. The Marketisation of Education in Singapore: Policies and Implications. International Review of Education 44, 47–63 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003127023737

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003127023737

Keywords

Navigation