Skip to main content
Log in

Self-compatibility and heterosis in white clover (Trifolium repens L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inbred lines of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) have been produced utilising the rare self-fertility (Sf) allele. Twenty-two lines of four distinct groups have been maintained through five generations of selfing by single seed descent. Fourteen lines were used in crosses to produce F1s. Both parents and hybrids were analysed for a range of morphological characters. Positive heterosis for dry matter production was observed in half the hybrids. No other trait showed significant heterosis. The degree of heterosis appears to be related to the extent of variation in morphological characters between the parental lines, some combinations of lines yielding heterotic hybrids in all cases, others in none. The majority of the F1 hybrids are superior in terms of dry matter production to eight control varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arunachalam, V., A. Bandyopadhyay, S.N. Nigam & R.W. Gibbons, 1984. Heterosis in relation to genetic divergence and specific combining ability in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 33: 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, S.S., 1940. Genetics of cross-incompatibility among self-incompatible plants of Trifolium repens. J Am Soc Agron 32: 955–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, S.S., 1941. Controlled self-and cross-pollination of Trifolium repens. J Am Soc Agron 33: 538–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, S.S., 1942a. Oppositional alleles causing cross-incompatibility in Trifolium repens. Genetics 27: 333–338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, S.S., 1942b. Genetics of self-compatibility in Trifolium repens. J Am Soc Agron 34: 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, S.S., 1942c. Genetics of pseudo-self-compatibility and its relation to cross-incompatibility in Trifolium repens. J Agric Res 64: 699–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, I. & P. Caligari, 1995. Selection methods in plant breeding. Plant Breeding Series. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, I. & L.D. Sparnaaij, 1993. Component analysis of complex characters in plant breeding. II. The pursuit of heterosis. Euphytica 70: 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charcoset, A., M. Lefort-Buson & A. Gallais, 1991. Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: a theoretical computation. Theor Appl Genet 81: 571–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vicente, M.C. & S.D. Tanksley, 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134: 585–596.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diers, B.W., P.B.E. McVetty & T.C. Osborn, 1996. Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance based on restriction fragment length polymorphism markers in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Crop Sci 36: 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, P.B. & C.C. Chen, 1973. Success in hybridising and selfing Trifolium repens at different temperatures. Crop Sci 13: 728–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gritton, E.T., 1975. Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel cross of peas. Crop Sci 15: 453–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isleib, T.G. & J.C. Wynne, 1983. Heterosis and testcrosses of 27 exotic peanut cultivars. Crop Sci 23: 832–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J., 1983. Biometrical genetics of heterosis. In: Frankel (Ed.), Heterosis. Reappraisal of Theory and Practice. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics 6, pp. 1–46. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G.F. & W.J. Whittington, 1978. Inheritance of yield components and yield in relation to evidence for heterosis in F1 barley hybrids. Euphytica 27: 587–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, K.K., E.T. Bingham, D.R. Woodfield & T.C. Osborn, 1994. Relationships among genetic distance, forage yield and heterozygosity in isogenic diploid and tetraploid alfalfa populations. Theor Appl Genet 89: 323–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefort-Buson, M., B. Guillot-Lemoine & Y. Dattee, 1987. Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) crosses between European and Asiatic selfed lines. Genome 29: 413–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, J., 1976. Genetic and evolutionary principles of heterosis. In: A. Jánossy & F.G.H. Lupton (Eds.), Heterosis in Plant Breeding. Proc 7th Congress Eucarpia: 17–33, pp. 365. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak, C. & T.C. Yap, 1977. Heterosis and combining ability of seed protein, yield and yield components in long bean. Crop Sci 17: 339–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotili, P., 1991. The role of selfing in the synthetic and hybrid varieties' constitution in the forage crops. In: Fodder Crops Breeding: Achievements, Novel Strategies and Biotechnology. Proceedings of the 16th Meeting of the Fodder Crops Section of Eucarpia, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 18–22 November 1990.

  • Sarawat, P., F.L. Stoddart, D.R.S. Marshall & S.M. Ali, 1994. Heterosis for yield and related characters in pea. Euphytica 80: 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparnaaij, I.D. & I. Bos, 1993. Component analysis of complex characters in plant breeding. I. Proposed method for quantifying the relative contribution of individual components to variation of the complex character. Euphytica 70: 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuber, C.W., S.E. Lincoln, D.W. Wolff, T. Helentjaris & E.S. Lander, 1992. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823–839.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, C.P., B.M. Smith, R.M. Godwin & M.J. Kearsey, 1991. The feasibility of producing inbred rather than F1 hybrid cultivars in Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleraceae var. gemmifera): an assessment of recombinant inbred lines. Ann Appl Biol 119: 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W., 1954. An emasculation technique for certain species of Trifolium. Agron J 46: 182–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W.M., 1987. Genetics and Breeding in White Clover. In: M.J. Baker & W.M. Williams (Eds), pp. 343–419. CAB International.

  • Woodfield, D.R. & E.T. Bingham, 1995. Improvement in two-allele autotetraploid populations of alfalfa explained by accumulation of favourable alleles. Crop Sci 35: 988–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, J., J. Li, L. Yuan & S.D. Tanksley, 1995. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140: 745–754.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, T., H. Fukuoka & T. Wakamatsu, 1989a. Recurrent selection programs for white clover (Trifolium repens L.) using self-compatible plants. I. Selection of self-compatible plants and inheritance of a self-compatibility factor. Euphytica 44: 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, T., S. Higuchi & A. Fukuoka, 1989b. Recurrent selection of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) using self-compatible factor, pp. 299–300. Proceedings of the XVI International Grassland Congress, Nice, France.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michaelson-Yeates, T., Marshall, A., Abberton, M. et al. Self-compatibility and heterosis in white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Euphytica 94, 341–348 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002989410326

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002989410326

Navigation