Summary
To determine the levels of heterosis in F1 hybrids, four current pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars from southern Australia were used as female parents and crossed with 18 introduced genotypes. The 22 parents, 72 F1 hybrids and, depending on the environment, either 54 or all 72 F2 families were grown in replicated plots in four environments. Grain yield, total dry matter, harvest index, branches per plant, pods per plant, seeds per pod, hundred seed weight, plant height, onset of flowering and flowering periods were evaluated. For both the F1 and F2 generation, heterosis was determined as the superiority over the mid-parent and also over the better parent. In addition, the superiority over the best commercial cultivar was calculated. Most hybrids were higher yielding than their mid-parent but were less stable in yield across environments. Four F1 hybrids were significantly higher yielding than the best parent, by up to 26%. There were significant correlations between F1 hybrid and mid-parent value for plant height, pods per plant and hundred seed weight but not for yield. Overall, grain yield heterosis was mainly due to more pods per plant in the hybrids. The level of heterosis for yield in a poor yielding environment was higher than that in a high yielding one. Both additive and non-additive gene effects were important in the expression of all studied traits. The average level of heterosis for grain yield and total dry matter in the F2 population was half of that in F1 hybrids. The low level of inbreeding depression from the F1 to the F2 generation suggested that epistatic gene action also contributed to the expression of grain yield. Some F2 populations maintained the high yield levels of the corresponding F1 hybrids.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan, R.E., 1973. Yields of wheat hybrids of the Triticum timopheevi nucleo-cytoplasmic system. p. 311–317. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Beil, G.M. & R.E., Atkins, 1967. Estimates of general and specific combining ability in F1 hybrids for grain yield and its components in grain sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers.). Crop Sci. 7: 225–228.
Borghi, B., M., Perenzin & R.J., Nash, 1988. Agronomic and qualitative characteristics of ten bread wheat hybrids produced using a chemical hybridizing agent. Euphytica 39: 185–194.
Cervato, A., A., Falavigna, C., Lorenzoni & M., Motto, 1977. Combining ability in seven cultivars of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Genet. Agrar. 32: 99–111.
Cregan, P.B. & R.H., Busch, 1978. Heterosis, inbreeding, and line performance in crosses of adapted spring wheats. Crop Sci. 18: 247–251.
Dubey, R.S. & S., Lai, 1983. Combining ability in peas. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed 43: 314–317.
Foolad, M.R. & A., Bassiri, 1983. Estimates of combining ability, reciprocal effects and heterosis for yield and yield components in a common bean diallel cross. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 100: 103–108.
Griffing, B. & E., Zsiros, 1971. Heterosis associated with genotype-environment interactions. Genetics 68: 443–455.
Gritton, E.T., 1975. Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel cross of peas. Crop Sci. 15: 453–457.
Guenzi, A.C., R.G., Sears & T.S., Cox, 1985. Stability analysis of winter wheat hybrids and cultivars. Annual Wheat Newsletter 31: 128.
Isleib, T.G. & J.C., Wynne, 1983. Heterosis in testcrosses of exotic peanut cultivars. Crop Sci. 23: 832–841.
Johnson, G.F. & W.J., Whittington, 1977. Genotype-environment interaction effects in F1 barley hybrids. Euphytica 26: 67–73.
Jošt, M. & C.F., Hayward, 1980. F1 hybrid versus 32 selected F7 lines performance of common winter wheat (Triticum aestivum ssp. vulgare). Theor. Appl. Genet. 57: 177–180.
Kaw, R.N. & P.M., Menon, 1979. Heterosis in a ten-parent diallel cross in soybean. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 49: 322–324.
Mak, C. & T.C., Yap, 1977. Heterosis and combining ability of seed protein, yield and yield components in long bean. Crop Sci. 17: 339–341.
Narsinghani, V.G. & S.P., Singh, 1979. Heterosis in mutant pea types. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 49: 39–42.
Narula, P.N., 1984. Heterosis and combining ability in wheat under three experimental conditions. SABRAO J. 16: 9–19.
Samad, M.A., A.G., Fautrier, D.L., McNeil & J.R., Sedcole, 1989. General and specific combining ability of reproductive characters, yield, and yield components for yield improvement in pea. N.Z.J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 17: 307–313.
Sarawat, P., F.L., Stoddard & D.R., Marshall, 1994. Derivation of superior F5 lines from heterotic hybrids in pea. Euphytica 72: 265–272.
Severson, D.A. & D.C., Rasmusson, 1968. Performance of barley hybrids at four seeding rates. Crop Sci. 8: 339–341.
Singh, K.B. & J.K., Singh, 1971. Potentialities of heterosis breeding in wheat. Euphytica 20: 586–590.
Singh, S.P., H.N., Singh, N.D., Singh & J.P., Srivastava, 1978. Heterosis in peas. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 48: 705–710.
Uddin, M.N., 1991. Heterosis in wheat. PhD. Thesis, Univ. of Sydney.
Uddin, M.N., F.W., Ellison, L., O'Brien & B.D.H., Latter, 1992. Heterosis in F1 hybrids derived from crosses of adapted Australian wheats. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 43: 907–919.
Venkateswarlu, S. & R.B., Singh, 1981. Heterosis and combining ability in peas. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 41: 255–258.
Venkateswarlu, S. & R.B., Singh, 1983. Combining ability overenvironments in peas. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 43: 185–187.
Wells, D.G. & C.L., Lay, 1970. Hybrid vigor in hard red spring wheat crosses. Crop Sci. 10: 220–223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarawat, P., Stoddard, F.L., Marshall, D.R. et al. Heterosis for yield and related characters in pea. Euphytica 80, 39–48 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039296
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039296