Skip to main content
Log in

A Participatory-Inquiry Approach And The Mediation Of Mathematical Knowledge In A Multilingual Classroom

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes and analyses a short teaching episode in a multilingual secondary mathematics classroom in South Africa where the teacher is using a participatory-inquiry approach. The episode is used to illuminate the general claim that such an approach, because of the particular communicative demands it places on teachers and learners, can create specific dilemmas of mediation. Teachers are often aware of dilemmas they face. However, what can be obscured is how a participatory-inquiry approach can inadvertently constrain mediation of mathematical activity and access to mathematical knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adler, J.: 1993, ‘Beyond ‘tell and drill’ maths’, The Weekly Mail and Guardian: Review/Education Supplement, Summer. p. 2.

  • Adler, J.: 1995, ‘Dilemmas and a paradox: secondary mathematics teachers' knowledge of their teaching in multilingual classrooms’, Teaching & Teacher Education 11(3), 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J.: 1996a, Secondary Teachers' Knowledge of the Dynamics of Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Multilingual Classrooms. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

  • Adler, J.: 1996b, ‘Lave and Wenger's social practice theory and the teaching and learning of mathematics’, in Puig, L. and Guiterrez, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME20), Vol 2. University of Valencia, Valencia. pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M.: 1982, (ed.) Cultural and Economic Reproduction in Education, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini-Bussi, M. G.: 1995, ‘Analysis of classroom interaction discourse from a Vygotskian perspective’, in Meira, L. & Carraher, D. (eds), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol I., Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, pp. 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlak, A. and Berlak, H.: 1981, Dilemmas of Schooling: Teaching and Social Change, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B.: 1993, Foreword, in Daniels, H. (ed.), Charting the Agenda: Educational Activity after Vygotsky, Routledge, London, pp. xiii–xxiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.: 1976, Schooling in Capitalist America, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, K.: 1995a, ‘Peer interaction and the development of mathematical knowledge’, in Meira, L. and Carraher, D. (eds) Proceedings of the 19th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol I. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, pp. 216–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, K.: 1995b, ‘Classroom talk, interaction and control’, Perspectives in Education 16(2), 227–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. R.: 1986, ‘Developing mathematical literacy in a bilingual classroom’, in Cook-Gumperz, J. (ed.) The Social Construction of Literacy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 156–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H.: 1993, ‘The individual and the organisation’, in Daniels, H (ed.) Charting the Agenda: Educational Activity after Vygotsky. Routledge, London, pp. 46–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES: 1982, Mathematics Counts (The Cockcroft Report). HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlow-Bates, K., Lerman, S. and Morgan, C.: 1993, ‘A survey of current concepts of proof held by first year mathematics students’, in Hirabayashi, I. et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (PME17) Vol. 1, University of Tsubuka, Tsubuka, pp. 252–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivic, I.: 1989, ‘Profiles of educators: Lev S. Vygotsky (1896–1934)’, Prospects XIX(3), 427–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M.: 1985, ‘How do teachers manage to teach?’, Harvard Education Review 55(2), 178–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E.: 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J.: 1993, ‘Learning English as an additional language in multilingual classrooms’, in Daniels, H. (ed.), Charting the Agenda: Educational Activity After Vygotsky, Routledge, London, pp. 190–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, E. and Mason, J.: 1992, Teaching Mathematics: Action and Awareness, Monograph T. EM236. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N.: 1995, The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Among Teachers and Learners. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D., Griffin, P. and Cole, M.: 1989, The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in Schools. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D.: 1987, Speaking Mathematically. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D.: 1992, ‘Why are we doing this?’, Reporting back on mathematical investigations, in Sawada, D. (ed.) Communication in Learning Mathematics. Math Monograph, 10. Alberta Teachers Association (ATA), Edmonton, pp. 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D.: 1994, ‘Mathematics and language’, in Husen, T. and Postlethwaite, T.N. (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed.). Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp. 3634–3639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1967, The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S.: 1978, Mind in Society. Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S.: 1986, Thought and Language, Newly revised and edited by Alex Kozulin, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V.: 1988, The Mastery of Reason: Cognitive Development and the Production of Rationality. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V.: 1984, ‘The Zone of Proximal Development: some conceptual issues’. In Rogoff, B. and Wertsch, J. V. (eds) Children's Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. No 23. New Directions for Child Development. Jossey-Bass, san Francisco, pp. 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V.: 1991, ‘Sociocultural setting and the zone of proximal development: the problem of text-based realities’, in Landsmann, L. T. (ed.) Culture, Schooling and Psychological Development. Alex Publishing, New Jersey, pp. 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adler, J. A Participatory-Inquiry Approach And The Mediation Of Mathematical Knowledge In A Multilingual Classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics 33, 235–258 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002976114883

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002976114883

Keywords

Navigation