Skip to main content
Log in

Cultivar Identification and Relationships in Pisum Sativum L. Based on RAPD and Isoenzymes

  • Published:
Biologia Plantarum

Abstract

Two approaches were used to detect variability within 23 pea cultivars. Eight random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers produced 163 bands (114 polymorphic), whereas five isoenzyme systems produced 25 bands (20 polymorphic). Both methods provided good results in finger-printing and identified all cultivars tested. Genetic similarity analysis (UPGMA) gave different results from RAPD and isoenzyme data. This could reflect different properties of both marker types. These data were also analysed using the bootstrap method, which supported the idea of one common progenitor of cultivated peas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angevin, F.: Description of Varieties of Pea, Field Bean and Lupin in the European Union.-UNIP, Paris 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri, A., Paull, J.G., Langridge, P., Rathjen, A.J.: Genetic distance detected with RAPD markers among selected Australian commercial varietics and boron tolerant exotic germplasm of pea (Pisum sativumL.).-Mol. Breed. 1: 193-197, 1995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze'ev, N., Zohary, D.: Species relationships in the genus Pisum.-Israel J. Bot. 22: 73-91, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, C.D., Ortega, V.M., Vallejos, C.E.: DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms correlate with isozyme diversity in Phaseolus vulgarisL.-Theor. appl. Genet. 81: 806-811, 1991.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cactano-Anollés, G., Callahan, L.M., Williams, P.E., Weaver, K.R., Gresshoff, P.M.: DNA amplification fingerprinting analysis of bermudagrass (Cynodon): genetic relationships between species and interspecific crosses.-Theor. appl. Genet. 91: 228-235, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chunwongse, J., Martin, G.B., Tanksley, S.D.: Pre-germination genotypic screening using PCR amplification of half-seed.-Theor. appl. Genet. 86: 694-698, 1993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, R.J.: The characteristics of Pisum sativumL. (partim) (field pea) cultivars by sodium dodecylsulphate-polyacrylamide gel eledrophoresis.-J. nat. Inst. agr. Bot. 16: 213-220, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, R.J.: The characterisation and identification of crop cultivars by electrophoresis.-Electrophoresis 5: 59-72, 1984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dellaporta, S.L., Wood, J., Hicks, J.B.: A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II.-Plant mol. Biol. Rep. 1: 19-21, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dirlewanger, E., Isaac, P., Cousin, R., de Vienne, D.: Molecular markers linked to the resistance genes to main pea diseases.-In: Proc. 1stEur. Conf. Grain Legumes. Pp. 129-130. Angers 1992.

  • Dirlewanger, E., Isaac, P.G., Ranade, S., Belajouza, M., Cousin, R., de Vienne, D.: Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of loci associated with disease resistance genes and developmental traits in Pisum sativumL.-Theor. appl. Genet. 88: 17-27, 1994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J.: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap.-Evolution 39: 783-791, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J.: Phylogenies from molecular sequences, influence and reliability.-Annu. Rev. Genet. 22, 521-565, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gantotti, B.V., Kartha, K.K.: Pea.-In: Evans, D.A., Sharp, W.R., Ammirato, P.V. (ed.): Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Vol. 4: Techniques and Applications. Pp. 370-418. Macmillan, New York 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gepts, P.: The use of molecular and biochemical markers in crop evolution studies.-Evol. Biol. 27: 51-94, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoey, B.K., Crowe, K.R., Jones, V.M., Polans, N.O.: A phylogenetic analysis of Pisumbased on morphological characters, and allozyme and RAPD markers.-Theor. appl. Genet. 92: 92-100, 1996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, M.J.: Genetically controlled electrophoretic variants of a storage protein in Pisum sativum.-Aust. J. biol. Sci. 21: 827-829, 1968.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, P.: Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale.-Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 44: 223-270, 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimyuk, V.L., Carrol, B.J., Thomas, C.M., Jones, J.D.G.: Alkali treatment for rapid preparation of plant material for reliable PCR analysis.-Plant J. 3: 493-494, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Przybylska, J.: Identification and classification of the Pisumgenetic resources with the use of electrophoretic protein analysis.-Seed Sci. Technol. 14: 529-543, 1986.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samec, P.: DNA polymorphism and RAPD technology.-Genet. Šlecht. (Praha) 29: 291-320, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samec, P., Našince, V.: Detection of DNA polymorphism among pea cultivars using RAPD technique.-Biol. Plant. 37: 321-327, 1995.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samec, P., Našinec, V.: The use of RAPD technique for the identification and classification of Pisum sativumL. genotypes.-Euphytica 89: 229-234, 1996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stejskal, J., Pošvec, Z., Griga, M.: Utilisation of isoenzyme and protein spectra for identification of pea (Pisum sativumL.) cultivars.-Biológia (Bratislava) 51: 99, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šuška, M.: Isoenzymes from pea (Pisum) leaves and their use in cultivar identification.-Genet. Šlecht. (Praha) 29: 27-33, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šuška, M., Stejskal, J.: The electrophoretic identification of pea (Pisum sativumL.) cultivars by seed protein analysis.-Rost. Výroba (Praha) 38: 203-208, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiecicki, W.K., Wolko, B.: Application of electrophoretic methods of isozymes separation to genetical characterisation of pea (Pisum sativumL. s. lat.) cultivars.-Genet. Pol. 28: 89-99, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley, S.D.: Molecular markers in plant breeding.-Plant mol. Biol. Rep. 1: 3-8, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley, S.D., Young, N.D., Paterson, A.H., Bonierbale, M.W.: RFLP mapping in plant breeding: new tools for an old science.-Bio/Technology 7: 257-264, 1989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.A., Schroeder, H.E., Dudman, W.F.: Cotyledonary storage proteins in Pisum sativum. I. Molecular heterogeneity.-Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5: 263-279, 1978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, G.M., Frew, TJ., Weeden, N.F., Miller, A.L., Goulden, D.S.: Linkage analysis of er-l, a recessive Pisum sativumgene for resistance to powdery mildew fungus (Erysiphe pisiD.C.).-Theor. appl. Genet. 88: 1050-1055, 1994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vallejos, C.E.: Enzyme activity staining.-In: Tanksley, S.D., Orton, T.J.: (ed.): Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding. Part A. Pp. 469-516. Elsevier, Amsterdam-Oxford-New York 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, N.F., Ambrose, M., Swiecicki, W.: Pisum sativum, pea.-In: O'Brien, S.J. (ed.): Genetic Maps. Locus Maps of Complex Genomes, Book 6. Pp. 6.24-6.34. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.G.K., Kubelik, A.R., Livak, K.J., Rafalski, J.A., Tingey, S.V.: DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.-Nucl. Acids Res. 18: 6531-6535, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.G.K., Hanafey, M.K., Rafalski, J.A., Tingey, S.V.: Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Recombinant DNA, part I.-In: Wu, R. (ed.): Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 218. Pp. 704-740. Academic Press, San Diego 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samec, P., Pošvec, Z., Stejskal, J. et al. Cultivar Identification and Relationships in Pisum Sativum L. Based on RAPD and Isoenzymes. Biologia Plantarum 41, 39–48 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001700213655

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001700213655

Navigation