Skip to main content
Log in

Wild relatives of pigeonpea as a source of resistance to the pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch) and pod wasp (Tanaostigmodes cajaninae La Salle)

  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] is an important legume crop in South Asia, East and southern Africa, and the Caribbean. Pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch) and pod wasp (Tanaostigmodes cajaninae La Salle) are important constraints to increase the production and productivity of pigeonpea under subsistence farming conditions. Host plant-resistance can be used as an important component for the management of these pests, and therefore, we evaluated 28 accessions of wild relatives of pigeonpea for resistance to these pests. There were significant inter- and intra-species differences in the relative susceptibility to pod fly and pod wasp damage. Accessions belonging to Cajanus scarabaeoides (L.) Thouars, C. sericeus (Benth. ex Bak.) van der Maesen, Rhynchosia bracteata Benth. ex Bak., C. acutifolius (F.v. Muell.) van der Maesen, C. lineatus (W. & A.) van der Maesen, and C. albicans (W. & A.) van der Maesen showed resistance to pod fly damage, while those from C. platycarpus (Benth.) van der Maesen, C. cajanifolius (Haines) van der Maesen and R. aurea DC. were susceptible. For the pod wasp, some of the accessions from C. scarabaeoides, C. albicans, Flemingia stricta Roxb., and R. bracteata (Roxb.) Wight showed a resistant reaction, while ICPW 83 belonging to C. scarabaeoides showed a susceptible reaction. ICPW 141, ICPW 278, and ICPW 280 (C. scarabaeoides), ICPW 214 (R. bracteata), ICPW 14 (C. albicans), and ICPW 202 (F. stricta) showed resistance to both pod fly and pod wasp damage. There was considerable variation in accessions belonging to different species for their susceptibility to pod fly and pod wasp, which can be exploited to breed for resistance to these pests. There was a negative association between pod wasp and pod borer damage, and therefore, it is important to keep track of the relative susceptibility of pigeonpea genotypes to pod wasp, while breeding for resistance to pod borers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhosale D.J. and Nawale R.N. 1985. Field screening of pigeonpea germplasm against podfly Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch). Indian J. Ent. 47: 92-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borad P.K., Patel J.R. and Patel M.G. 1991. Evaluation of vegetable pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) genotypes resistant to gram-pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera), plume moth (Marasmarcha liophanes) and podfly (Melanagromyza obtusa). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 61: 682-684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durairaj C. and Ganapathy N. 1997.Evaluation of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) entries of late-maturity group for tolerance to pod borers (Helicoverpa armigera, Maruca testulalis) and pod-fly (Melanagromyza obtusa). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 67: 317-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S.C., Lateef S.S. and Ariyanayagam R.P. 1991. Are determinates inferior to indeterminates in short-duration pigeonpea? Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 13: 11-13. 1992. The medium term plan, Volume 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRISAT Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India, ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics), 80 pp.

  • Lal S.S., Yadava C.P. and Chandra S. 1986. Suppression of podfly damage through varietal selection. Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 5: 42-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal S.S., Yadava C.P. and Sachan J.N. 1988. Studies on some aspects of oviposition and damage of podfly in relation to the host phenology. Indian J. Pulses Res. 1: 83-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lateef S.S. and Pimbert M.P. 1990. The search for host plant resistance to Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea and pigeonpea at ICRISAT Summary proceedings of the First Consultative Group Meeting on Host Selection Behaviour of Heliothis armigera. ICRISAT, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India, pp. 25-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lateef S.S., Reed W. and La Salle J. 1985. Tanaostigmodes cajaninae La Salle sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Tanaostigmatidae), a potential pest of pigeonpea in India. Bull. Ent. Res. 75: 305-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nene Y.L. and Sheila V.K. 1990. Pigeonpea. Geography and importance. In: Nene Y.L., Hall S.D. and Sheila V.K. (eds), The Pigeonpea. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed W. and Lateef S.S. 1990. Pigeonpea. Pest management. In: Nene Y.L., Hal S.D. and Shiela V.K. (eds), The Pigeonpea. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 349-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanower T.G., Romeis J. and Minja E.M. 1999. Insect pests of pigeonpea and their management. Annu. Rev. Ent. 44: 77-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanower T.G., Lal S.S. and Bhagwat V.R. 1998. Biology and management of Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Crop Prot. 17: 249-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh H.K. and Singh H.N. 1990. Screening of certain pigeonpea cultivars sown at Kharif and Rabi crops against tur pod bug, Clavigralla gibbosa and podfly, Melanagromyza obtuse. Indian J. Ent. 52: 320-327.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, H., Pampapathy, G. & Reddy, L. Wild relatives of pigeonpea as a source of resistance to the pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch) and pod wasp (Tanaostigmodes cajaninae La Salle). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50, 817–824 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025967528757

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025967528757

Navigation