Skip to main content
Log in

Dependence of Skin Permeability on Contact Area

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. We report that experimentally measured skin permeability to hydrophilic solutes increases with decreasing contact area between the formulation and the skin. Our results suggest that an array of smaller reservoirs should thus be more effective in increasing transdermal drug delivery compared to a large single reservoir of the same total area.

Methods. Experimental assessment of the dependence of skin permeability on reservoir size was performed using two model systems, an array of liquid reservoirs with diameters in the range of 2 mm to 6 mm and an array of gel disk reservoirs with diameters in the range of 3 mm to 16 mm. Full thickness pig skin was used as an experimental model. Two molecules, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and oleic acid, were used as model penetration enhancers.

Results. Mannitol transport per unit area into and across the skin increased with a decrease in the contact area between the skin and the formulation. Mannitol permeability increased approximately 6-fold with a decrease in the reservoir size from 16 mm to 3 mm in presence of 0.5% SLS in PBS (phosphate buffered saline) as a permeability enhancer. Similar results were obtained when oleic acid was used as an enhancer.

Conclusions. To explain the observed dependence of transdermal transport on contact area a simple mathematical model based on skin geometry in the reservoir was developed. The model predicts a lateral strain in the skin due to preferential swelling of skin upon penetration of water. We propose that this lateral strain is responsible for the increased skin permeability at lower reservoir sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. Bouwstra. The skin, a well organized membrane. Coll. Surf. A. 123-124:403-413 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Mitragotri. Synergistic effect of enhancers for transdermal drug delivery. Pharm. Res. 17:1354-1359 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Mitragotri, D. Blankschtein, and R. Langer. Ultrasound-Mediated Transdermal Protein Delivery. Science 269:850-853 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. V. Badkar and A. K. Banga. Electrically enhanced transdermal delivery of a macromolecule. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 54:907-912 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. B. Finnin and M. T. Morgan. Transdermal penetration enhancers: Applications, limitations and potential. J. Pharm. Sci. 88:955-958 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. S. Papir, K. Hsu, and R. H. Wildnauer. The mechanical properties of stratum corneum. I. The effect of water and ambient temperature on the tensile properties of newborn rat stratum corneum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 399:170-180 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Norlen, A. Emilson, and B. Forslind. Stratum corneum swelling. Biophysical and computer assisted quantitative assessments. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 289:506-513 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Van Duzee. The influence of water content, chemical treatment and ambient temperature on rheological properties of skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 71:140-144 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. B. James, B. Jemec, B. I. Jemec, and J. Serup. The effect of superficial hydration on mechanical properties of skin in vivo: implications for plastic surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 85:100-103 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Alonso, N. Meirelles, V. Yushmanov, and M. Tabak. Water increases the fluidity of intercellular membranes of stratum corneum: Correlation with water permeability, elastic and electrical resistance properties. J. Invest. Dermatol. 106:1058-1063 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Yamamura and T. Tezuka. The water holding capacity of the stratum corneum measured by 1H-NMR. J. Invest. Dermatol. 93:160-164 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Pedersen and G. Jemec. Plasticising effect of water and glycerin on human skin in vivo. J. Dermatol. Sci. 19:48-52 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. H. Blank. Further observations on factors which influence the water content of the stratum corneum. J. Invest. Dermatol. 21:259-271 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Sparr and H. Wennerstrom. Responding phospholipid membranes-interplay between hydration and permeability. Biophys. J. 81:1014-1028 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. A. Van Hal, E. Jeremiasse, H. E. Junginger, F. Spies, and A. Bouwstra. Structure of Fully Hydrated Human Stratum Corneum—a freeze fracture electron microscopy study. J. Invest. Dermatol. 106:89-95 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Buchanan, J. Arrault, and M. Cates. Swelling and dissolution Lamellar phases: role of bilayer organization. Langmuir 14:7371-7377 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Diridollou, F. Patat, F. Gens, L. Vaillant, D. Black, J. Lagarde, Y. Gall, and M. Berson. In vivo model of the mechanical properties of the human skin under suction. Skin Res. Technol. 6:214-221 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Walser. Role of edge damage in sodium permeability of toad bladder and a means of avoiding it. Am. J. Phys. 219:252-255 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Helman and D. A. Miller. Edge damage effect on electrical measurements of frog skin. Am. J. Phys. 225:972-977 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Helman and D. A. Miller. Edge damage effect on measurement of urea and sodium flux in frog skin. Am. J. Phys. 226:1198-1203 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samir Mitragotri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karande, P., Mitragotri, S. Dependence of Skin Permeability on Contact Area. Pharm Res 20, 257–263 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022231406277

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022231406277

Navigation