Abstract
This study investigated parent-reported receptivity towards the classroom environment and classroom outcomes. Classroom environment was based on a five-aspect model: (1) provision of information from the child; (2) beliefs about the school; (3) provision of information from teachers; (4) teachers' commitment to working with parents; and (5) confidence in communicating with teachers. Classroom outcomes were based on two aspects: (1) educational values (importance of schooling, involved with learning; seeing a future through learning, desire to learn, and importance of learning); and (2) learning outcomes (achieving, and views of child's engagement in school work). For each aspect, items were written in an ordered-by-difficulty pattern so that, for example, Item 2 involved Item 1 and ‘more’, making it conceptually ‘harder’ to agree with Item 2 than with Item 1. There were four Likert response categories (SDA, DA, A, and SA). Using the extended logistic model of Rasch, an interval-level, unidimensional scale was created with item difficulties for classroom environment aspects and classroom outcomes calibrated on the same scale as the receptivity measures. The sample consisted of 518 parents of students from three secondary schools in Western Australia. The item sample was 30. The proportion of observed variance considered true was 0.94. The items for each aspect were found to be ordered from ‘easy’ to ‘hard’ in line with the hypothesised model of receptivity and the data fitted the measurement model well.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Andrich, D. (1982). Using latent trait measurement to analyse attitudinal data: A synthesis of viewpoints. In D. Spearitt (Ed.), The improvement of measurement in education and psychology (pp. 89-126). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Andrich, D. (1985). A latent trait model for items with response dependencies: Implications for test construction and analysis. In S. E. Embretson (Ed.), Test design: Developments in psychology and psychometrics (pp. 245-275). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Andrich, D. (1988a). A general form of Rasch's Extended Logistic Model for Partial Credit Scoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 1(4), 363-378.
Andrich, D. (1988b). Rasch models for measurement (Sage University paper on quantitative applications in the social sciences, Series number 07/068). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Andrich, D. (1989). Distinctions between assumptions and requirements in measurement in the social sciences. In J. A. Keats, R. Taft, R. A. Heath, & S. Lovibond (Eds.), Mathematical and theoretical systems (pp. 7-16). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., Lyne, A., & Luo, G. (2000). RUMM: A windows-based item analysis program employing Rasch unidimensional measurement models. Perth, Australia: Murdoch University.
Andrich, D., & van Schoubroeck, L. (1989). The General Health Questionnaire: A psychometric analysis using latent trait theory. Psychological Medicine, 19, 469-485.
Cavanagh, R. F., & Dellar, G. B. (1997, March). Towards a model of school culture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Cavanagh, R. F., Dellar, G. B., Ellett, C. D., & Rugutt, J. K. (2000, April). Development of an instrument for investigating classroom culture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Cavarretta, J. (1998). Parents are a school's best friend. Educational Leadership, 55(8), 12-15.
Coleman, P. (1998a). Parent, student and teacher collaboration: The power of three. San Francisco: Corwin Press Inc.
Coleman, P. (1998b, April). Triad influence: Shaping student commitment to school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Curriculum Council of Western Australia. (1998). Curriculum framework. Perth, Australia: Author.
Education Department of Western Australia. (1997). Plan for government education 1998-2000. Perth, Australia: Author.
Epstein, J. (1992). School and family partnerships. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of educational research (Vol. 4, pp. 1139-1151). New York: Macmillan.
Gettinger, M., & Guetschow, K. W. (1998). Parental involvement in schools: Parent and teacher perceptions of roles, efficacy and opportunities. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32(1), 38-51.
Hobson, P. J. (1979). The Partnership with title I parents. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Partners: Parents and schools (pp. 41-45). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Kellaghan, T., Sloane, K., Alvarez, B., & Bloom, B. (1993). The home environment and schooling learning: Promoting parental involvement in education of children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Krumm, V. (1996). Parent involvement in Austria and Taiwan: Results of a comparative study. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(1), 9-24.
Patrikakou, E. N. (1997). A model of parental attitudes and the academic achievement of adolescents. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 31(1), 7-26.
Rasch, G. (1960/1980). Probabilistic models for intelligence and attainment tests (expanded edition). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (original work published in 1960).
Snodgrass, D. M. (1991). The parent connection. Adolescence, 74, 3-17.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Styles, I., & Andrich, D. (1993). Linking the standard and advanced forms of the Raven's Progressive Matrices in both the pencil-and-paper and computer-adaptive testing formats. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(4), 905-925.
Trusty, J. (1996). Relationship of parental involvement in teens' career development to teens' attitudes, perceptions, and behavior. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 63-69.
Trusty, J. (1999). Effect of eighth-grade parental involvement on late adolescents' educational expectations. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32(4), 224-233.
Waugh, R. F. (1999). Approaches to Studying Inventory for students in higher education: A Rasch measurement model analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 63-79.
Waugh, R. F. (2000). Self-concept: Multidimensional or multifaceted, unidimensional? Education Research & Perspectives, 27(2), 75-94.
Waugh, R. F. (2001). Measuring ideal and real self-concept on the same scale based on a multifaceted, hierarchical model of self-concept. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(1), 85-101.
Waugh, R. F. (2002). Creating a scale to measure motivation to achieve academically: Linking attitudes and behaviours using Rasch measurement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1), 65-86.
Wright, B. D. (1999). Fundamental measurement for psychology. In S. E. Embretson & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), The new rules of measurement (pp. 65-104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waugh, R.F., Cavanagh, R.F. Measuring Parent Receptivity Towards the Classroom Environment Using a Rasch Measurement Model. Learning Environments Research 5, 329–352 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021928423858
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021928423858